ai-six-sigma-property-os
Design an AI Six Sigma Black Belt operating model for property service, maintenance dispatch, environmental testing, quote generation, CRM follow-up, and workflow quality dashboards. Use when the user needs a Property Agent OS, AI + Ontology + DMAIC management system, CTQ metrics, agent-team roles, work-order states, or MVP roadmap for operations quality.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Mark393295827/third-brain-v5-skills /tmp/ai-six-sigma-property-os && cp -r /tmp/ai-six-sigma-property-os/skills/ai-six-sigma-property-os ~/.claude/skills/ai-six-sigma-property-osSKILL.md
# AI Six Sigma Property OS
Build a practical operating model for property service quality using:
```text
Ontology defines the business world.
Agent Team executes and audits workflows.
Six Sigma DMAIC continuously reduces errors, delay, rework, and cost.
```
This skill is for designing the management system before building software. It should produce executable operating structure: ontology, roles, CTQ metrics, work-order flow, database tables, dashboards, and MVP scope.
## Usage Template
**Prompt**
```text
Use ai-six-sigma-property-os for my Property Agent OS.
Design an AI + Ontology + DMAIC Black Belt operating model for property work orders, worker dispatch, environmental testing, quote generation, CRM follow-up, evidence upload, and quality dashboards.
```
**Use Case**
- Founder wants to turn messy property maintenance operations into a measurable AI workflow.
- Operator needs CTQ metrics, root-cause analysis, dispatch rules, quote controls, and evidence gates.
- Product team needs a first-stage MVP plan before building a full property SaaS.
**Expected Result**
- A practical operating memo with pyramid model, DMAIC loop, ontology objects, agent roles, CTQ scorecard, dashboard design, core tables, work-order states, control plan, and MVP roadmap.
**Output Example**
- MVP Stage 1: classify work orders, recommend workers, generate quote draft, require evidence upload, and track response time, completion time, rework rate, complaint rate, quote error, gross margin.
**Verification Case**
- Every module maps to at least one CTQ metric, data field, owner, human confirmation point, and control check.
**Verified Effect**
- A service workflow becomes a measurable quality flywheel instead of ad hoc manual coordination.
## Success Metrics
- Defines the business objective and first-stage operating scope.
- Produces a DMAIC workflow tied to real property operations, not generic quality jargon.
- Names ontology objects, required fields, agent roles, CTQ metrics, dashboards, and work-order states.
- Separates AI recommendations from human approval for quotes, dispatch exceptions, safety, compliance, and customer-impacting decisions.
- Includes a narrow MVP roadmap focused on work orders, workers, quotes, evidence, and quality dashboard before expanding.
## When to Use
- "Design my Property Agent OS."
- "Build an AI Six Sigma model for property maintenance."
- "Use DMAIC to improve dispatch, quote, and service quality."
- "Create CTQ metrics and dashboards for my work-order business."
- "Design agent roles for property, environmental testing, and CRM operations."
## Operating Pyramid
Use this as the top-level model:
```text
Business goals
Reduce cost / raise speed / stabilize quality / make repeatable / support financing
↓
Six Sigma Black Belt layer
DMAIC / data analysis / root cause / control plan
↓
Ontology semantic layer
Customer / property / asset / work order / worker / route / quote / rule / evidence
↓
Agent Team execution layer
Classify / dispatch / quote / audit / review / control
↓
Field operations
Repair request / service / environmental test / payment / review
```
Core rule:
```text
Ontology clarifies.
Agents execute and audit.
DMAIC improves the system after every work order.
```
## Step 1: Define the Operating Scope
Classify the case before designing:
| Field | Options |
|---|---|
| Business type | property repair, maintenance, environmental testing, cleaning, inspection, CRM follow-up |
| Stage | idea, manual pilot, spreadsheet MVP, internal tool, SaaS product |
| First workflow | work-order classification, dispatch, quote, evidence, quality dashboard |
| Human approval level | all decisions, quote only, exceptions only, mostly automated |
| Data maturity | no data, sheets, CRM, database, integrated system |
Default MVP scope:
```text
1. work-order classification
2. worker dispatch recommendation
3. quote draft generation
4. evidence upload and audit
5. quality dashboard
```
Do not expand into a full ERP, marketplace, payroll system, or finance system before this loop works.
## Step 2: DMAIC Workflow
Map Six Sigma to the property workflow:
| DMAIC | Property OS use |
|---|---|
| Define | Define customer pain, work-order types, SLA, service standards, CTQ metrics |
| Measure | Track response time, dispatch time, completion time, quote error, rework, complaint, evidence completeness |
| Analyze | Find root causes for delay, wrong dispatch, missing evidence, wrong quote, low rating |
| Improve | Update dispatch rules, quote rules, worker matching, SOPs, customer scripts |
| Control | Use dashboards, alerts, approval gates, SOP audits, agent review, weekly Black Belt review |
Every work order should become a learning event:
```text
Work order creates data
Data reveals problems
Problems trigger root-cause analysis
Root causes improve rules
Rules train agents
Agents improve speed and quality
More volume creates better data
```
## Step 3: MECE Quality Domains
Score quality across seven non-overlapping domains:
| Domain | Controls | Core metrics |
|---|---|---|
| Customer quality | experience, response, satisfaction | first response time, satisfaction, complaint rate |
| Work-order quality | classification, dispatch, completion, acceptance | first-time fix rate, rework rate, timeout rate |
| Worker quality | skills, location, reliability, rating | on-time rate, completion rate, customer score |
| Quote quality | accuracy, margin, approval | quote error rate, gross margin, close rate |
| Process quality | end-to-end flow | cycle time, bottleneck, wait time |
| Data quality | completeness, accuracy, traceability | missing field rate, missing photo rate, missing location rate |
| Knowledge quality | SOPs, rules, lessons | SOP hit rate, rule update frequency, case review rate |
If a module has no metric, it is not ready for automation.
## Step 4: Ontology Objects
Define the business world before defining agents.
Minimum ontologyExecute a daily knowledge compound closed loop — 7 Key Results from input to feedback with scoring. Use when the user wants to do a daily review, plan their day, or run a knowledge workflow.
Extract reusable knowledge from a work session and save concepts, entities, corrections, patterns, ideas, decisions, and gaps to the wiki. Use when ending a session or when the user says to extract knowledge.
Estimate and track token usage and cost across the knowledge pipeline. Run before expensive tasks to budget, after tasks to log actuals.
Health-check the knowledge wiki — find orphans, broken links, missing frontmatter, contradictions, stale content, and statistical drift. Use when the user says "lint the wiki", "health check", or periodically for maintenance.
Command multi-agent work with bounded roles, ownership, integration gates, and verification loops. Use when the user needs Claude Code Agent Teams, parallel agents, delegation strategy, or multi-agent orchestration.
Design or refactor agent skills, workflows, and operating loops for model-native Agentic Engineering. Use when making skills more autonomous, concise, verifiable, long-horizon capable, token-efficient, and lower-friction for human-LLM collaboration.
Improve a personal or team operating system with self-evolving loops, CASH allocation, 3B creativity, predictive coding, and diagnostics. Use when the user wants to redesign a work method, learning loop, or cognitive operating system.
Design a behavior change system — decompose a goal into minimum habits, define triggers, build SOPs, and set up review cycles. Use when the user wants to build a habit, change behavior, or achieve a personal goal.