cs-escalation-brief
# cs-escalation-brief This Claude Code skill generates structured escalation briefs for at-risk customer accounts, organizing critical information into account context, timeline, root cause analysis, business impact, and actionable resolution plans. Use it when customers threaten churn, P1 issues require executive attention, accounts escalate internally, or when preparing save plays for retention efforts.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills /tmp/cs-escalation-brief && cp -r /tmp/cs-escalation-brief/plugins/pm-cs/skills/cs-escalation-brief ~/.claude/skills/cs-escalation-briefSKILL.md
# Customer Escalation Brief Skill Produce a clear, concise escalation brief that gives internal stakeholders — VP CS, CCO, product leadership, or the CEO — everything they need to understand the situation, make decisions, and act fast. A good escalation brief is not a complaint. It is a professional document that states the facts, assigns accountability honestly, and proposes a specific resolution plan. ## Required Inputs Ask for these if not already provided: - **Account name**, tier, and ARR - **CSM name** and account owner - **Nature of the escalation** — what happened, what the customer is saying - **Timeline** of events leading to escalation - **Customer contact** who escalated (name, role, influence level) - **What the customer wants** — their stated ask - **What we believe the root cause is** - **What has already been done** to address the situation - **Renewal date** and current renewal risk assessment ## Escalation Levels Calibrate urgency and audience based on escalation level: | Level | Trigger | Audience | Response time | |---|---|---|---| | L1 — Account Risk | Customer expressing dissatisfaction; renewal at risk | CSM + CS Manager | 24 hours | | L2 — Executive Escalation | Customer escalated to their exec; requesting vendor exec involvement | VP CS + Account Exec | 4 hours | | L3 — Churn Risk | Customer has issued notice or is in active churn conversation | CCO / CEO + Revenue leadership | 1 hour | | L4 — Public Risk | Customer threatening public escalation, legal, or press | CCO / Legal / Comms | Immediate | ## Output Format --- # Escalation Brief: [Account Name] **Escalation level:** L[1/2/3/4] — [Label] **Date raised:** [Date] **Raised by:** [CSM name] **Escalation owner:** [Name of exec or senior stakeholder now leading response] --- ## Account at a Glance | Field | Detail | |---|---| | ARR | £/$/€[X] | | Tier | Enterprise / Mid-Market / SMB | | Customer since | [Date] | | Renewal date | [Date] — [N] days away | | Renewal risk (pre-escalation) | Green / Amber / Red | | Renewal risk (current) | Green / Amber / Red | | Customer contact who escalated | [Name, role, seniority] | | Executive sponsor (customer) | [Name, role — active / passive / vacant] | | Executive sponsor (vendor) | [Name, role] | --- ## What Happened — Summary [3–5 sentences. State the facts plainly. What the customer experienced, how they reacted, and how we learned about the escalation. No editorialising. No blame.] --- ## Timeline List in chronological order. Each entry: `[Date / time] — [What happened. Who did what.]` Include: - When the original issue or trigger event occurred - When the customer first raised concerns (informally) - When it escalated (formal escalation or exec involvement) - Actions taken since escalation --- ## Root Cause **Primary cause:** [One clear sentence. What specifically went wrong.] **Contributing factors:** - [Factor 1 — be honest about internal failures as well as external ones] - [Factor 2] **Is this a systemic issue or isolated?** [ ] Isolated to this account [ ] Pattern seen in other accounts — details: [_______] [ ] Product or process gap that needs fixing --- ## Customer's Stated Position **What the customer says happened:** [Their version of events — fair and unfiltered] **What they are asking for:** [Their explicit ask — compensation, fix by date, exec call, SLA credit, exit clause] **Sentiment of escalating contact:** [Frustrated but constructive / Angry / Seeking exit / Unknown] **Risk of public escalation:** Low / Medium / High — [evidence if Medium or High] --- ## Business Impact | Impact type | Detail | |---|---| | ARR at risk | £/$/€[X] | | Potential churn probability | [X]% | | Reputational risk | Low / Medium / High | | Reference / case study status | [Was a reference — now at risk / Not a reference] | | Expansion pipeline at risk | £/$/€[X] | --- ## What Has Been Done So Far 1. [Action taken — by whom — date — outcome] 2. [Action taken — by whom — date — outcome] 3. [Action taken — by whom — date — outcome] **Has a formal apology or acknowledgement been issued?** Yes / No --- ## Proposed Resolution Plan **Immediate actions (next 24–48 hours):** | Action | Owner | By when | |---|---|---| | [Action] | [Name] | [Date] | | [Action] | [Name] | [Date] | **Medium-term actions (next 2–4 weeks):** | Action | Owner | By when | |---|---|---| | [Action] | [Name] | [Date] | **What we are NOT offering:** [Be explicit about what is not on the table — avoids misaligned expectations] **Success criteria:** [How will we know the escalation is resolved? What does the customer need to confirm they are satisfied?] --- ## Decision Required from Escalation Owner [State clearly what decision or resource the escalation owner needs to provide. Be specific — do not make them ask. E.g.: "We need approval to offer a 20% service credit for Q2" or "We need an exec call with [name] within 48 hours."] --- ## Communication Plan | Audience | Message | Channel | Owner | By when | |---|---|---|---|---| | Escalating customer contact | [Summary of message] | Email / Call | [Name] | [Date] | | Customer exec sponsor | [Summary] | Call | [Name] | [Date] | | Internal CS team | [Summary] | Slack / Meeting | CS Manager | [Date] | --- ## Quality Checks - [ ] Root cause is specific — not "communication breakdown" or "product gap" without detail - [ ] Customer's position is stated fairly — not minimised or dismissed - [ ] A clear decision is requested from the escalation owner — brief does not end with "what do you think?" - [ ] ARR at risk is quantified - [ ] Communication plan has owners and dates — not "TBD" - [ ] Language is professional and blameless toward individuals ## Anti-Patterns - [ ] Do not assign blame to individuals — focus on system failures and process gaps - [ ] Do not downplay ARR at risk or describe churn risk vaguely without a number - [ ] Do not leave resolution plan ownership as "TBD" or unassigned - [ ] Do not write the bri
Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.
Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.
Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.
Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.
Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.
Plan a trip that actually works with a disability or access need — confirm real accessibility (not just 'accessible' labels), book the assistance in advance, plan for equipment and medication, and build in the contingencies for when access breaks down. Use when someone says 'plan an accessible trip', 'travelling with a wheelchair/disability', 'book assistance for my flight', or 'will this hotel actually work for me'. Produces an access-verified itinerary, an assistance-booking checklist, an equipment/medication plan, and contingency scripts. Verify specifics with providers.
Request a reasonable accommodation at work or in education — frame it around the barrier and the adjustment (not your diagnosis), cite the right process, and navigate the back-and-forth constructively. Use when someone says 'I need a workplace accommodation', 'request reasonable adjustments', 'ADA/Equality Act accommodation', or 'how do I ask for accommodations for my disability/condition'. Produces the request letter, a barriers-and-adjustments map, disclosure guidance, and a plan for the interactive process. Not legal advice — routes to the formal process and to advocacy where needed.
Build a structured account plan for any key customer or target account. Use when asked to create an account plan, key account strategy, strategic account review, or territory plan. Produces a complete account plan with relationship map, growth opportunities, risks, and 90-day action plan.