database-schema-design
# Database Schema Design Skill This skill produces a complete database schema design document for a specified domain, including entity relationship diagrams, table definitions with DDL, index strategies, access pattern analysis, and normalization decisions. Use it when designing a new database from scratch, documenting an existing schema, modeling domain entities and their relationships, defining table structures for a system, planning indexing strategies to optimize queries, or preparing a data model for architectural review or migration planning.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills /tmp/database-schema-design && cp -r /tmp/database-schema-design/plugins/pm-engineering/skills/database-schema-design ~/.claude/skills/database-schema-designSKILL.md
# Database Schema Design Skill
Produce a complete database schema design document for a given domain. A schema document is not just a list of tables — it is a record of decisions: what was modelled, how entities relate, which queries the schema is optimised for, and what trade-offs were made.
A good schema design document lets an engineer understand the data model, query it correctly, extend it safely, and write migrations without breaking things.
## Required Inputs
Ask for these if not already provided:
- **Domain description** — what the system does; what business objects are being modelled
- **Entities and relationships** — the main things in the domain and how they relate (e.g. "a User has many Orders; an Order has many OrderItems; an OrderItem references a Product")
- **Expected query patterns** — the most important read and write queries (e.g. "fetch all orders for a user, sorted by date"; "look up a product by SKU")
- **Database engine** — PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, CockroachDB, etc. — this affects DDL syntax and available types
- **Expected data volume** — approximate row counts, growth rate, and any partitioning needs
- **Constraints** — any existing conventions, naming standards, or migration constraints to respect
## Output Format
---
# Database Schema Design: [Domain / Service Name]
**Service:** [Name] | **Team:** [Team name]
**Author:** [Name] | **Reviewed by:** [Name]
**Date:** [Date] | **Database engine:** [PostgreSQL X.X / MySQL X.X / etc.]
**Status:** [Draft / Reviewed / Approved]
---
## 1. Overview
[2–3 sentences describing the domain being modelled, the scope of this schema, and any key design philosophy (e.g. "this schema prioritises read performance for the customer-facing API over write simplicity", or "designed for eventual migration to multi-tenancy")]
**In scope:**
- [Entity or subsystem]
- [Entity or subsystem]
**Out of scope:**
- [e.g. Analytics / reporting tables — separate schema]
- [e.g. Audit log tables — covered in separate design doc]
---
## 2. Entity Relationship Diagram
```
┌───────────────────┐ ┌───────────────────────┐
│ users │ │ organisations │
│───────────────── │ │─────────────────────── │
│ id (PK) │ ┌───▶│ id (PK) │
│ org_id (FK) ─────┼────┘ │ name │
│ email │ │ plan │
│ display_name │ │ created_at │
│ created_at │ └───────────────────────┘
│ updated_at │
└─────────┬─────────┘
│ 1
│
│ N
┌─────────▼─────────┐ ┌───────────────────────┐
│ [table_a] │ │ [table_b] │
│───────────────── │ │─────────────────────── │
│ id (PK) │ N │ id (PK) │
│ user_id (FK) ─────┼────────▶│ [table_a]_id (FK) │
│ [field] │ │ │ [field] │
│ [field] │ │ │ [field] │
│ created_at │ │ created_at │
└───────────────────┘ └───────────────────────┘
```
**Relationship summary:**
| Entity A | Relationship | Entity B | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| organisations | has many | users | An org can have many users |
| users | has many | [table_a] | Soft-deleted on user deletion |
| [table_a] | has many | [table_b] | Cascade delete |
| [table_b] | belongs to | [table_a] | Non-nullable FK |
| [table_c] | many-to-many (via [join_table]) | [table_d] | Join table with metadata |
---
## 3. Table Definitions
### `organisations`
[1 sentence describing what this table stores and its role in the domain.]
```sql
CREATE TABLE organisations (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT gen_random_uuid(),
name VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
slug VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL UNIQUE,
plan VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL DEFAULT 'free'
CHECK (plan IN ('free', 'pro', 'enterprise')),
settings JSONB NOT NULL DEFAULT '{}',
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT now(),
updated_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT now()
);
```
| Column | Type | Nullable | Default | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| id | UUID | No | gen_random_uuid() | Surrogate PK — UUID preferred over serial for distributed use |
| name | VARCHAR(255) | No | — | Display name; not unique |
| slug | VARCHAR(100) | No | — | URL-safe identifier; unique across all orgs |
| plan | VARCHAR(50) | No | 'free' | Constrained to known values via CHECK |
| settings | JSONB | No | {} | Flexible config; avoid for queryable fields |
| created_at | TIMESTAMPTZ | No | now() | Always use TIMESTAMPTZ, not TIMESTAMP |
| updated_at | TIMESTAMPTZ | No | now() | Updated via trigger (see below) |
---
### `users`
[1 sentence describing what this table stores.]
```sql
CREATE TABLE users (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT gen_random_uuid(),
org_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES organisations(id)
ON DELETE RESTRICT,
email VARCHAR(254) NOT NULL,
display_name VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
role VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL DEFAULT 'member'
CHECK (role IN ('owner', 'admin', 'member', 'viewer')),
email_verified BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT false,
deleted_at TIMESTAMPTZ NULL,
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT now(),
updated_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT now(),
CONSTRAINT users_email_org_unique UNIQUE (email, org_id)
);
```
| Column | Type | Nullable | Default | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| id | UUID | No | gen_random_uuid() | — |
| org_id | UUID | No | — | FK to organisations; RESTRICT prevents orphaning |
| email | VARCHAR(254) | No | — | RFC 5321 max length; unique per org (not globally) |
| role | VARCHAR(50) | No | 'member' | Application-level RBAC |
| deleted_at |Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.
Decode a 401k or workplace retirement plan — the real cost of its funds, the match's fine print, vesting math, and the plan features worth using or avoiding. Use when someone asks 'is my 401k any good', 'decode my 401k plan', 'which funds should I look at', or 'what fees am I paying'. Produces a fee decode in dollars-over-time, match and vesting math, a fund-lineup triage by cost, and the questions for HR or the plan administrator.
Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.
Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.
Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.
Plan a trip that actually works with a disability or access need — confirm real accessibility (not just 'accessible' labels), book the assistance in advance, plan for equipment and medication, and build in the contingencies for when access breaks down. Use when someone says 'plan an accessible trip', 'travelling with a wheelchair/disability', 'book assistance for my flight', or 'will this hotel actually work for me'. Produces an access-verified itinerary, an assistance-booking checklist, an equipment/medication plan, and contingency scripts. Verify specifics with providers.
Request a reasonable accommodation at work or in education — frame it around the barrier and the adjustment (not your diagnosis), cite the right process, and navigate the back-and-forth constructively. Use when someone says 'I need a workplace accommodation', 'request reasonable adjustments', 'ADA/Equality Act accommodation', or 'how do I ask for accommodations for my disability/condition'. Produces the request letter, a barriers-and-adjustments map, disclosure guidance, and a plan for the interactive process. Not legal advice — routes to the formal process and to advocacy where needed.
Build a structured account plan for any key customer or target account. Use when asked to create an account plan, key account strategy, strategic account review, or territory plan. Produces a complete account plan with relationship map, growth opportunities, risks, and 90-day action plan.