achieving-cmmc-level-2-compliance
>-
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills /tmp/achieving-cmmc-level-2-compliance && cp -r /tmp/achieving-cmmc-level-2-compliance/skills/achieving-cmmc-level-2-compliance ~/.claude/skills/achieving-cmmc-level-2-complianceSKILL.md
# Achieving CMMC Level 2 Compliance ## When to Use - When an organization in the **Defense Industrial Base (DIB)** stores, processes, or transmits **Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)** under a DoD contract. - When a contract includes **DFARS 252.204-7012** (safeguarding/incident reporting), **-7019/-7020** (NIST 800-171 self-assessment + SPRS), or the new **-7021** (CMMC requirement). - When preparing for a **C3PAO** third-party assessment or a DoD-led assessment. - When you must **compute, post, or improve an SPRS score** based on the NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Methodology. - When authoring or remediating a **System Security Plan (SSP)** and **POA&M** for the 110 requirements. - When **scoping** which assets fall inside the CUI/FCI boundary (CUI assets, security-protection assets, contractor risk-managed assets, out-of-scope). ## Prerequisites - Knowledge of **which contracts carry CUI** and the CUI categories involved (check the contract and the DoD CUI Registry). - An asset inventory and network diagram so you can define the **CMMC assessment scope** before assessing controls. - The **NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2** requirements and the **DoD Assessment Methodology** scoring weights. - A documented **SSP** (its absence is itself a failed requirement — 3.12.4). - Identification of any **External Service Providers (ESPs)** / cloud services touching CUI, and whether they meet **FedRAMP Moderate (or equivalency)**. ## Workflow ### 1. Determine applicability and CUI categories Confirm the contract requires CMMC Level 2 (CUI present, not just FCI). FCI-only contracts are **Level 1** (the 15 FAR 52.204-21 requirements). Identify CUI categories from the contract and the DoD CUI Registry. ### 2. Scope the environment Classify every asset into one of the CMMC scoping categories: - **CUI Assets** — process/store/transmit CUI (in scope, assessed against all applicable controls). - **Security Protection Assets** — provide security to the CUI environment (in scope). - **Contractor Risk Managed Assets** — could but are not intended to handle CUI; managed by policy. - **Specialized Assets** (IoT/OT, GFE, test equipment) — documented, limited assessment. - **Out-of-Scope** — physically/logically isolated from CUI. Minimize scope deliberately — a smaller, well-segmented CUI enclave is far cheaper to certify than a flat network. ### 3. Implement the 110 requirements (NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2) Work the **14 families** (3.1–3.14). For each requirement, implement, then write the **how** in the SSP. High-leverage early wins: MFA (3.5.3), FIPS-validated cryptography (3.13.11), audit logging (3.3.x), access control + least privilege (3.1.x), and incident response (3.6.x). ### 4. Score with the DoD Assessment Methodology (SPRS) Start at **110** and subtract the weighted value (**1, 3, or 5 points**) of each **unmet** requirement; partial credit applies to a small number of controls (e.g., MFA, FIPS crypto). The result is the **SPRS score** (maximum 110; the methodology floor is −203). Post the score, the SSP date, and the assessment scope to **SPRS** (or eMASS for higher assessments). ### 5. Build a compliant POA&M Document every unmet requirement with owner, remediation, and milestone. **Constraints under the CMMC rule:** a **Conditional** status requires a score of at least **80%** (≥ 88 of 110), only **POA&M-eligible** requirements may be deferred (the highest-weighted security requirements must be fully met — verify eligibility against 32 CFR Part 170), and all POA&M items must be **closed within 180 days** to convert Conditional → **Final**. ### 6. Assess (self or C3PAO) - **Level 1** and a subset of Level 2 = annual **self-assessment** with an affirmation in SPRS. - **Level 2 (most CUI contracts)** = triennial **C3PAO** certification assessment. - **Level 3** = DoD (DIBCAC) assessment on top of Level 2, adding SP 800-172 enhanced requirements. Assessors evaluate each objective as **MET / NOT MET / N/A** with evidence (examine/interview/test). A senior official files the **annual affirmation** of continued compliance. ### 7. Maintain certification Certification is valid **three years** with **annual affirmations**. Maintain the SSP, re-score on change, keep evidence current, and feed significant changes back into the assessment. ## Key Concepts | Concept | Definition | |---|---| | FCI | Federal Contract Information — Level 1 protects it (FAR 52.204-21). | | CUI | Controlled Unclassified Information — Level 2 protects it (NIST 800-171). | | 110 requirements | The SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families. | | SPRS | Supplier Performance Risk System — where the 800-171 score is posted. | | DoD Assessment Methodology | The 1/3/5-point weighting used to compute the score from 110. | | C3PAO | CMMC Third-Party Assessment Organization — performs Level 2 certification. | | POA&M | Plan of Action & Milestones — limited, must close in 180 days for Final status. | | Conditional vs Final | Conditional = open POA&M (score ≥ 80%); Final = all controls met. | | ESP | External Service Provider — must meet FedRAMP Moderate / equivalency for CUI. | | Scoping categories | CUI / Security Protection / Contractor Risk Managed / Specialized / Out-of-Scope. | ## Tools & Systems - **NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2** — the 110 requirements (and 800-171A for assessment objectives). - **DoD NIST SP 800-171 Assessment Methodology** — the scoring weights. - **32 CFR Part 170** (CMMC Program rule) and **48 CFR / DFARS 252.204-7021** (acquisition rule). - **SPRS** — score posting; **SAM.gov** for registration. - **SP 800-172 / 800-172A** — enhanced requirements for Level 3. - **GRC / compliance tooling** — to manage the SSP, POA&M, and evidence (e.g., Xacta, RegScale, FutureFeed-style trackers). ## Common Scenarios - **Prime flows CUI to a sub.** The sub needs its own Level 2 scope, SSP, SPRS score, and (most likely) C3PAO certification. - **Score is below 88.** Prioritize the highest-weighted unmet requireme
Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
Detect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3
Perform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.
Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect
Query ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator visualizations for threat-intel reporting.
Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query