Skip to main content
ClaudeWave
Skill85 repo starsupdated 1mo ago

test-driven-execution

# ClaudeWave Editor Entry **test-driven-execution** defines acceptance criteria and test scenarios before implementation begins, ensuring code is written to pass concrete tests rather than ambiguous specifications. Use this skill at the start of any feature or bug fix to extract requirements, write test specifications following red-green-refactor methodology, implement code that satisfies those tests, and verify completion through passing test suites and coverage reports.

Install in Claude Code
Copy
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/omergocmen/vibe-coder-kit /tmp/test-driven-execution && cp -r /tmp/test-driven-execution/.agent/skills/test-driven-execution ~/.claude/skills/test-driven-execution
Then start a new Claude Code session; the skill loads automatically.

SKILL.md

<!--
  TÜRKÇE AÇIKLAMA
  ───────────────
  Bu skill, implementasyon kodu yazmadan önce "başarı kriterleri"ni ve test senaryolarını
  tanımlar. Agent, kodu belirsiz bir tanıma değil — somut testleri geçmek için yazar.
  Kırmızı→Yeşil→Refactor döngüsünü uygular. "Bence çalışıyor" yerine "testler geçiyor" der.

  NE ZAMAN: Her yeni feature veya bug fix'ten önce. Test spec olmadan kod yazılmaz.
  ÇIKTI:    Geçen testler, coverage raporu, "Task Complete" özeti.
-->

# Test-Driven Execution Skill

## When to Trigger

- At the start of any feature or task from a plan
- When a bug fix is requested (test first, then fix)
- When a subagent is about to implement a module
- When "done" is ambiguous and needs a clear definition

## Philosophy

> "A feature is not done when code is written. It is done when the tests pass."

Tests written *before* code serve three purposes:
1. They force clarity on what "correct" actually means
2. They prevent the agent from drifting into over-engineering
3. They provide instant verification that the task is complete

## Step-by-Step Process

### 1. Extract Acceptance Criteria

Read the task description and extract every "must" and "should":

**Example task:** *"Add a user registration endpoint"*

Extracted criteria:
- Must accept `email`, `password`, `name` in request body
- Must return 201 on success with the created user (excluding password)
- Must return 400 if email is already registered
- Must return 422 if fields are missing or invalid
- Must hash the password before storing

### 2. Write the Test Specification

Before writing any implementation, write the tests (or test outlines):

#### For unit tests:

```javascript
describe('registerUser()', () => {
  it('creates a user with hashed password', async () => { ... })
  it('throws DuplicateEmailError if email already exists', async () => { ... })
  it('throws ValidationError if email format is invalid', async () => { ... })
  it('never stores plaintext password', async () => { ... })
})
```

#### For integration/API tests:

```javascript
describe('POST /api/auth/register', () => {
  it('returns 201 and user object (without password) on success', async () => { ... })
  it('returns 400 when email already registered', async () => { ... })
  it('returns 422 when required fields missing', async () => { ... })
})
```

#### For UI/E2E tests:

```
Scenario: Successful registration
  Given I am on the /register page
  When I fill in valid email, password, and name
  And I click "Create Account"
  Then I should be redirected to /dashboard
  And I should see "Welcome, <name>"
```

### 3. Confirm Tests Fail (Red)

Run the tests *before* writing any implementation:

```bash
npm test
# or
pytest
# etc.
```

**Expected:** All new tests fail. This confirms the tests are correctly detecting the absence of the feature. If a test passes before implementation, the test is wrong — fix it.

### 4. Write the Minimum Implementation (Green)

Now implement the feature. The goal is simple: **make the tests pass**.

Rules during implementation:
- Write only what is needed to pass the tests — nothing more
- If you find yourself writing code with no corresponding test, stop and write the test first
- Don't optimize yet — correctness first

```bash
# Keep running tests as you go
npm test --watch
```

### 5. Refactor (Refactor)

Once all tests pass:
- Clean up the code (naming, structure, duplication)
- Run tests again after every refactor step to confirm nothing broke
- Add edge case tests for anything discovered during implementation

### 6. Define the Done Checklist

A task is complete when:

- [ ] All acceptance criteria from Step 1 have a corresponding test
- [ ] All tests pass (`npm test` exits with code 0)
- [ ] No test is skipped (no `.skip`, `xtest`, `# noqa`)
- [ ] Code coverage for the new module is ≥ 80% (check with `--coverage`)
- [ ] No existing tests were broken by this change

### 7. Report Completion

```
## Task Complete: <feature name>

**Tests written:** <N>
**Tests passing:** <N>/<N>
**Coverage:** <X>%
**Acceptance criteria covered:**
  ✅ Creates user with hashed password
  ✅ Returns 400 on duplicate email
  ✅ Returns 422 on validation failure
  ✅ Never stores plaintext password

**Not covered (and why):**
  ⚠️ Email delivery test — skipped, requires mock SMTP setup
```

## Test Naming Convention

Test names must read as requirements:

✅ `it('returns 400 when email already exists')`
✅ `it('never exposes password in API response')`
❌ `it('test email duplicate')`
❌ `it('works correctly')`

If you can't name the test clearly, the requirement isn't clear enough — clarify before writing.

## Rules

- **No implementation before test spec.** The spec can be pseudocode / outlines, but it must exist.
- **A failing test is not a failure** — it is a correctly written test in the red phase.
- **Never delete a test to make the suite pass.** Fix the code or fix the test — with justification.
- **Integration tests are not optional** for public-facing APIs.
- **Coverage % is a proxy, not a goal.** 100% coverage with meaningless assertions is worse than 70% with real ones.