dspy-evaluation-suite
The dspy-evaluation-suite enables systematic measurement of DSPy program performance using built-in metrics like answer_exact_match and SemanticF1, or custom scoring functions. Use this skill when benchmarking program variants, establishing baseline performance, validating production readiness, or comparing results before and after applying optimizers.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OmidZamani/dspy-skills /tmp/dspy-evaluation-suite && cp -r /tmp/dspy-evaluation-suite/skills/dspy-evaluation-suite ~/.claude/skills/dspy-evaluation-suiteSKILL.md
# DSPy Evaluation Suite
## Goal
Systematically evaluate DSPy programs using built-in and custom metrics with parallel execution.
## When to Use
- Measuring program performance before/after optimization
- Comparing different program variants
- Establishing baselines
- Validating production readiness
## Related Skills
- Use with any optimizer: [dspy-bootstrap-fewshot](../dspy-bootstrap-fewshot/SKILL.md), [dspy-miprov2-optimizer](../dspy-miprov2-optimizer/SKILL.md), [dspy-gepa-reflective](../dspy-gepa-reflective/SKILL.md)
- Evaluate RAG pipelines: [dspy-rag-pipeline](../dspy-rag-pipeline/SKILL.md)
## Inputs
| Input | Type | Description |
|-------|------|-------------|
| `program` | `dspy.Module` | Program to evaluate |
| `devset` | `list[dspy.Example]` | Evaluation examples |
| `metric` | `callable` | Scoring function |
| `num_threads` | `int` | Parallel threads |
## Outputs
| Output | Type | Description |
|--------|------|-------------|
| `score` | `float` | Average metric score |
| `results` | `list` | Per-example results |
## Workflow
### Phase 1: Setup Evaluator
```python
from dspy.evaluate import Evaluate
evaluator = Evaluate(
devset=devset,
metric=my_metric,
num_threads=8,
display_progress=True
)
```
### Phase 2: Run Evaluation
```python
result = evaluator(my_program)
print(f"Score: {result.score:.2f}%")
# Access individual results: (example, prediction, score) tuples
for example, pred, score in result.results[:3]:
print(f"Example: {example.question[:50]}... Score: {score}")
```
## Built-in Metrics
### answer_exact_match
```python
import dspy
# Normalized, case-insensitive comparison
metric = dspy.evaluate.answer_exact_match
```
### SemanticF1
LLM-based semantic evaluation:
```python
from dspy.evaluate import SemanticF1
semantic = SemanticF1()
score = semantic(example, prediction)
```
## Custom Metrics
### Basic Metric
```python
def exact_match(example, pred, trace=None):
"""Returns bool, int, or float."""
return example.answer.lower().strip() == pred.answer.lower().strip()
```
### Multi-Factor Metric
```python
def quality_metric(example, pred, trace=None):
"""Score based on multiple factors."""
score = 0.0
# Correctness (50%)
if example.answer.lower() in pred.answer.lower():
score += 0.5
# Conciseness (25%)
if len(pred.answer.split()) <= 20:
score += 0.25
# Has reasoning (25%)
if hasattr(pred, 'reasoning') and pred.reasoning:
score += 0.25
return score
```
### GEPA-Compatible Metric
```python
def feedback_metric(example, pred, trace=None, pred_name=None, pred_trace=None):
"""Return a GEPA-compatible score and textual feedback."""
correct = example.answer.lower() in pred.answer.lower()
if correct:
return dspy.Prediction(score=1.0, feedback="Correct answer provided.")
else:
return dspy.Prediction(
score=0.0,
feedback=f"Expected '{example.answer}', got '{pred.answer}'"
)
```
## Production Example
```python
import dspy
from dspy.evaluate import Evaluate, SemanticF1
import json
import logging
from typing import Optional
from dataclasses import dataclass
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
@dataclass
class EvaluationResult:
score: float
num_examples: int
correct: int
incorrect: int
errors: int
def comprehensive_metric(example, pred, trace=None) -> float:
"""Multi-dimensional evaluation metric."""
scores = []
# 1. Correctness
if hasattr(example, 'answer') and hasattr(pred, 'answer'):
correct = example.answer.lower().strip() in pred.answer.lower().strip()
scores.append(1.0 if correct else 0.0)
# 2. Completeness (answer not empty or error)
if hasattr(pred, 'answer'):
complete = len(pred.answer.strip()) > 0 and "error" not in pred.answer.lower()
scores.append(1.0 if complete else 0.0)
# 3. Reasoning quality (if available)
if hasattr(pred, 'reasoning'):
has_reasoning = len(str(pred.reasoning)) > 20
scores.append(1.0 if has_reasoning else 0.5)
return sum(scores) / len(scores) if scores else 0.0
class EvaluationSuite:
def __init__(self, devset, num_threads=8):
self.devset = devset
self.num_threads = num_threads
def evaluate(self, program, metric=None) -> EvaluationResult:
"""Run full evaluation with detailed results."""
metric = metric or comprehensive_metric
evaluator = Evaluate(
devset=self.devset,
metric=metric,
num_threads=self.num_threads,
display_progress=True
)
eval_result = evaluator(program)
# Extract individual scores from results
scores = [score for example, pred, score in eval_result.results]
correct = sum(1 for s in scores if s >= 0.5)
errors = sum(1 for s in scores if s == 0)
return EvaluationResult(
score=eval_result.score,
num_examples=len(self.devset),
correct=correct,
incorrect=len(self.devset) - correct - errors,
errors=errors
)
def compare(self, programs: dict, metric=None) -> dict:
"""Compare multiple programs."""
results = {}
for name, program in programs.items():
logger.info(f"Evaluating: {name}")
results[name] = self.evaluate(program, metric)
# Rank by score
ranked = sorted(results.items(), key=lambda x: x[1].score, reverse=True)
print("\n=== Comparison Results ===")
for rank, (name, result) in enumerate(ranked, 1):
print(f"{rank}. {name}: {result.score:.2%}")
return results
def export_report(self, program, output_path: str, metric=None):
"""Export detailed evaluation report."""
result = self.evaluate(program, metric)
report = {Use this skill when you need to QA audit and fix a plugin skill file. Provides a methodology for verifying skill content against official documentation, fixing issues in-place, and producing verification reports.
Use for DSPy adapter selection, JSONAdapter, XMLAdapter, ChatAdapter, native function calling, structured outputs, and multimodal inputs like dspy.Image or dspy.Audio.
Use for composing DSPy modules with Ensemble, MultiChainComparison, ensemble voting, sequential pipelines, and multi-program workflows.
Use for BetterTogether, prompt plus weight optimization, fine-tuning sequences, and strategy chains like p -> w -> p.
Use for BootstrapFewShot, bootstrapped demonstrations, teacher-model demos, and low-data DSPy prompt optimization.
Use for creating custom DSPy modules, extending dspy.Module, reusable components, stateful modules, serialization, and module testing.
Use for debugging DSPy programs, inspect_history, tracing LLM calls, custom callbacks, observability, monitoring, and cost tracking.
Use for DSPy retrieval with dspy.Embedder, dspy.Embeddings, FAISS indexes, semantic search, and local or hosted embedding models.