paper-citation-planner
Paper-citation-planner maps specific claims across paper sections to appropriate BibTeX references before drafting begins. It accepts a paper topic, outline, curated source pack, bibliography, and style preferences, then outputs a structured plan assigning citations by role (background, method, comparison, limitation) to each major claim. Use this when you need to verify citation coverage aligns with your argument structure and avoid last-minute gaps or unsupported claims.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/opensquilla/opensquilla /tmp/paper-citation-planner && cp -r /tmp/paper-citation-planner/src/opensquilla/skills/bundled/paper-citation-planner ~/.claude/skills/paper-citation-plannerSKILL.md
# paper-citation-planner You plan citation use before the paper sections are drafted. ## Inputs you'll receive - `topic`: the paper topic. - `paper_preferences`: mode, audience, venue style, emphasis, must-include requirements, and avoid list. - `outline`: the paper outline. - `source_pack`: curated references with `refN` keys. - `bibliography`: BibTeX entries. ## Output contract Plain text only. Produce exactly these sections: ``` CITATION_PLAN: INTRODUCTION: - claim: <claim>; cite: ref1, ref2; role: <background/prior work/gap> METHOD: - claim: <claim>; cite: ref7, ref8; role: <method/design/baseline> RESULTS: - claim: <claim>; cite: ref13, ref14; role: <comparison/metric/interpretation> DISCUSSION: - claim: <claim>; cite: ref17, ref18; role: <limitation/implication/future work> USAGE_RULES: <2-4 sentences on avoiding unsupported claims and duplicate citation stuffing> ``` ## Hard rules - Use at least 20 distinct citation keys when at least 20 are available. - Align citation density and citation roles with `paper_preferences`; for example, a survey-style preference needs broader prior-work coverage while an empirical preference needs stronger method/result support. - Use only keys present in `source_pack` or `bibliography`. - Assign citations to claims, not to filler sentences. - Spread citations across introduction, method, results, and discussion. - Reply with the citation plan only; no preamble, no Markdown fences.
Submit audio or video for multilingual dubbing, poll status, and download dubbed audio. Use when the user asks for dubbing, 多语言配音, 视频翻译配音, 译制片, or wants a source clip dubbed into another language.
Generate a structured short-video shooting script from a topic. Emits a strict, machine-parseable shot list (3 shots by default) with image prompt + video prompt + voiceover + on-screen text per shot. Trigger when the user asks for a video script, 分镜, 短视频文案, AI视频, 短剧脚本, or wants visual prompts ready for image/video generation.
Use when the user asks to schedule recurring tasks, one-off reminders, timers, or cron-style jobs through the OpenSquilla cron tool.
Multi-round research with explicit methodology, evidence tracking, and citation-tagged synthesis. Trigger on 'deep dive', 'research report', 'literature review', 'investigate X across sources', 'multi-round investigation'. Distinct from the `summarize` skill, which is a single-pass condensation; this skill maintains a state file across iterations, tracks coverage, and produces a long-form report with per-claim citations. Three execution stages: plan (scope into sub-questions), iterate (record evidence per round), compile (synthesize report). The skill itself does not fetch the web — it tells the host agent which fetches to perform via OpenSquilla's existing web tools, and records what comes back.
Read, edit, or create Microsoft Word `.docx` files. Trigger this skill whenever the user mentions a Word document, .docx file, contract, report, brief, memo, or asks to extract text, modify an existing doc, generate one from a brief, or audit tracked changes. Three execution paths: text-and-structure extraction, in-place edit-by-run (preserves styles), and create-from-scratch with python-docx. Falls back to OOXML unzip-and-patch for layout work python-docx cannot reach.
Capture the current git diff (staged, working-tree, or staged file list) as text. Direct shell call for workflows that need repository diffs without an LLM agent loop.
GitHub operations via `gh` CLI: issues, PRs, CI runs, code review, API queries. Use when: (1) checking PR status or CI, (2) creating/commenting on issues, (3) listing/filtering PRs or issues, (4) viewing run logs. NOT for: complex web UI interactions requiring manual browser flows (use browser tooling when available), bulk operations across many repos (script with gh api), or when gh auth is not configured.
Query the per-turn DecisionEntry log for skill co-occurrence patterns, meta-skill usage stats, and the router fixture corpus. Returns a JSON summary suitable for downstream LLM consumption. Used by meta-skill-creator's harvest step but also useful standalone for 'which skills did I use most this week?'