analyze-feature-requests
This Claude Code skill analyzes and prioritizes feature requests by organizing them into thematic groups, assessing strategic alignment with product goals, and ranking top opportunities using impact, effort, risk, and strategic fit criteria. Use it when managing customer feedback backlogs, making prioritization decisions, or evaluating which problems merit development resources, particularly when applying the Opportunity Score framework to distinguish genuine customer needs from solution proposals.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/phuryn/pm-skills /tmp/analyze-feature-requests && cp -r /tmp/analyze-feature-requests/pm-product-discovery/skills/analyze-feature-requests ~/.claude/skills/analyze-feature-requestsSKILL.md
## Analyze Feature Requests Categorize, evaluate, and prioritize customer feature requests against product goals. ### Context You are analyzing feature requests for **$ARGUMENTS**. If the user provides files (spreadsheets, CSVs, or documents with feature requests), read and analyze them directly. If data is in a structured format, consider creating a summary table. ### Domain Context Never allow customers to design solutions. Prioritize **opportunities (problems)**, not features. Use **Opportunity Score** (Dan Olsen) to evaluate customer-reported problems: Opportunity Score = Importance × (1 − Satisfaction), normalized to 0–1. See the `prioritization-frameworks` skill for full details and templates. ### Instructions The user will describe their product goal and provide feature requests. Work through these steps: 1. **Understand the goal**: Confirm the product objective and desired outcomes that will guide prioritization. 2. **Categorize requests into themes**: Group related requests together and name each theme. 3. **Assess strategic alignment**: For each theme, evaluate how well it aligns with the stated goals. 4. **Prioritize the top 3 features** based on: - **Impact**: Customer value and number of users affected - **Effort**: Development and design resources required - **Risk**: Technical and market uncertainty - **Strategic alignment**: Fit with product vision and goals 5. **For each top feature**, provide: - Rationale (customer needs, strategic alignment) - Alternative solutions worth considering - High-risk assumptions - How to test those assumptions with minimal effort Think step by step. Save as markdown or create a structured output document. --- ### Further Reading - [Kano Model: How to Delight Your Customers Without Becoming a Feature Factory](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/kano-model-how-to-delight-your-customers) - [Continuous Product Discovery Masterclass (CPDM)](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/cpdm) (video course)
The method for finding the gap between what a system is supposed to do and what the code actually does — the class of bug generic scanners miss because they have no model of intent. Defines what counts as documented intent, what counts as implementation evidence, which mismatches matter, and how to avoid hand-wavy findings. Use when auditing AI-built code, reviewing access control against documented permissions, or checking whether a codebase matches its own documentation.
The durable documentation set that makes an AI-built (vibe-coded) app reviewable before shipping. A small core every app needs — architecture, user/permission flows, permissions, variables/secrets, and a test-coverage map — plus conditional docs added only when they apply: emails, scheduled work, SEO, and embedded agents/automation. Defines what each doc must capture and how a reviewer or auditor uses it. Use when documenting a codebase for handoff, mapping user journeys and trust-boundary crossings, planning test coverage, or preparing for a security or performance audit.
Analyze A/B test results with statistical significance, sample size validation, confidence intervals, and ship/extend/stop recommendations. Use when evaluating experiment results, checking if a test reached significance, interpreting split test data, or deciding whether to ship a variant.
Perform cohort analysis on user engagement data — retention curves, feature adoption trends, and segment-level insights. Use when analyzing user retention by cohort, studying feature adoption over time, investigating churn patterns, or identifying engagement trends.
Generate SQL queries from natural language descriptions. Supports BigQuery, PostgreSQL, MySQL, and other dialects. Reads database schemas from uploaded diagrams or documentation. Use when writing SQL, building data reports, exploring databases, or translating business questions into queries.
Brainstorm team-level OKRs aligned with company objectives — qualitative objectives with measurable key results. Use when setting quarterly OKRs, aligning team goals with company strategy, drafting objectives, or learning how to write effective OKRs.
Create a Product Requirements Document using a comprehensive 8-section template covering problem, objectives, segments, value propositions, solution, and release planning. Use when writing a PRD, documenting product requirements, preparing a feature spec, or reviewing an existing PRD.
Generate realistic dummy datasets for testing with customizable columns, constraints, and output formats (CSV, JSON, SQL, Python script). Use when creating test data, building mock datasets, or generating sample data for development and demos.