docs-audit-and-refresh
Audit the repository's docs/ content against the current codebase,
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code /tmp/docs-audit-and-refresh && cp -r /tmp/docs-audit-and-refresh/.qwen/skills/docs-audit-and-refresh ~/.claude/skills/docs-audit-and-refreshSKILL.md
# Docs Audit And Refresh ## Overview Audit `docs/` from the repository outward: inspect the current implementation, identify documentation gaps or inaccuracies, and update the relevant pages. Keep the work inside `docs/` and treat code, tests, and current configuration surfaces as the authoritative source. Read [references/audit-checklist.md](references/audit-checklist.md) before a broad audit so the scan stays focused on high-signal areas. ## Workflow ### 1. Build a current-state inventory Inspect the repository areas that define user-facing or developer-facing behavior. - Read the relevant code, tests, schemas, and package surfaces. - Focus on shipped behavior, stable configuration, exposed commands, integrations, and developer workflows. - Use the existing docs tree as a map of intended coverage, not as proof that coverage is complete. ### 2. Compare implementation against `docs/` Look for three classes of issues: - Missing documentation for an existing feature, setting, tool, or workflow - Incorrect documentation that contradicts the current codebase - Stale documentation that uses old names, defaults, paths, or examples Prefer proving a gap with repository evidence before editing. Use current code and tests instead of intuition. ### 3. Prioritize by reader impact Fix the highest-cost issues first: 1. Broken onboarding, setup, auth, installation, or command flows 2. Wrong settings, defaults, paths, or feature behavior 3. Entirely missing documentation for a real surface area 4. Lower-impact clarity or organization improvements ### 4. Refresh the docs Update the smallest correct set of pages under `docs/`. - Edit existing pages first - Add new pages only for clear, durable gaps - Update the nearest `_meta.ts` when adding or moving pages - Keep examples executable and aligned with the current repository structure - Remove dead or misleading text instead of layering warnings on top ### 5. Validate the refresh Before finishing: - Search `docs/` for old terminology and replaced config keys - Check neighboring pages for conflicting guidance - Confirm new pages appear in the right `_meta.ts` - Re-read critical examples, commands, and paths against code or tests - Verify bundled skill doc indices still match the current `docs/` tree. The `qc-helper` bundled skill (`packages/core/src/skills/bundled/qc-helper/SKILL.md`) maintains a hardcoded table mapping topics to doc file paths. If you added, moved, renamed, or removed a page under `docs/users/`, that table must be updated to match. Check the Features and Configuration tables in the SKILL.md against the actual files in `docs/users/features/` and `docs/users/configuration/`. Other bundled or project skills may also reference doc paths — search for `docs/users/` across `.qwen/skills/` and `packages/core/src/skills/bundled/` to catch them. ## Audit standards - Favor breadth-first discovery, then depth on confirmed gaps. - Do not rewrite large areas without evidence that they are wrong or missing. - Keep README files out of scope for edits; limit changes to `docs/`. - Call out residual gaps if the audit finds issues that are too large to solve in one pass. ## Deliverable Produce a focused docs refresh that makes the current repository more accurate and complete. Summarize the audited surfaces and the concrete pages updated.
Use after a Codex or Claude Code feature has been implemented in Qwen Code to run the selected reference agent and Qwen Code under the same scenario, capture HTTP and terminal traces, compare request bodies, tool/function schemas, outputs, and iterate until the reproduced behavior is close enough.
Use when reproducing an existing Codex or Claude Code feature in Qwen Code or another agent CLI by choosing a reference agent, capturing HTTP request bodies, prompts, tool/function schemas, terminal output, and then implementing the matching behavior in the target repo.
Review and repair current local changes until they converge, or run Qwen Code Autofix issue and review workflows from GitHub Actions.
Fix a bug from a GitHub issue, following the reproduce-first
Classify a bounded batch of stale PR CI failures and choose the safest response.
Analyze indexed codebases via graph database (neug) and vector index (zvec). Covers call graphs, dependencies, dead code, hotspots, module coupling, architecture reports, semantic search, impact analysis, bug root cause from GitHub issues, class diagrams (UML), and PR review (risk scoring, conflict detection, auto-merge candidates, labeling). Also covers creating, inspecting, and repairing a CodeScope index. Use for: code structure, who calls what, why something changed, similar functions, module boundaries, bug tracing, class relationships, PR risk/conflicts, or any question benefiting from a code knowledge graph. Applies when a `.codegraph` index exists in the workspace, or when the user wants to create one.
Draft and submit a GitHub issue from a user idea or bug description, with bilingual body and correct labels.
Stabilize a flaky test with a minimal, assertion-preserving fix — never by weakening or deleting the check.