Skip to main content
ClaudeWave
Skill417 repo starsupdated 3d ago

verify-ui-change

Check that a change to a web app actually works in the running app before calling it done. Drives the real page and returns a pass/fail verdict with the request that fired, the state that moved, and the file:line to fix. Use after editing a component, a form, a route, or an API call; when you have said "fixed" but have not opened the app; when the user asks "does it actually work?"; or when a change looks right on screen and you cannot prove it.

Install in Claude Code
Copy
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/reticlehq/reticle /tmp/verify-ui-change && cp -r /tmp/verify-ui-change/skills/verify-ui-change ~/.claude/skills/verify-ui-change
Then start a new Claude Code session; the skill loads automatically.

SKILL.md

# Verify the change in the running app

You edited something a user can see. Nothing is proven until the real app has done it and something other than the DOM agrees.

This uses **Reticle**, which embeds a dev-only SDK in the user's running app and exposes it as `reticle_*` MCP tools. No screenshots, no browser download for the verify loop, no dev server of its own.

## 1. Are the tools here?

```
reticle_sessions()
```

- **A session comes back** → go to step 2.
- **Tools do not exist** → Reticle is not installed. Run `RETICLE_INSTALL_SOURCE=npx_skill npx @reticlehq/server@latest init`, then keep going without the tools: fix every `⚠` it printed, start the project's own dev script in the background if nothing is serving the app, and open it with `npx @reticlehq/server open <the url the dev server is serving>`. Only once the app is running and connected, ask for the one thing you cannot do yourself: a client restart, so it picks up the MCP server. Stopping at the `init` command leaves the user with config files and an uninstrumented page. Full setup is in the [`install-and-verify`](https://github.com/reticlehq/reticle/blob/main/skills/install-and-verify/SKILL.md) skill.
- **Tools exist, list is empty** → read the `why` field on the response. It distinguishes "no app running" from "an app is running that never dialled this daemon" from "a tab was here and closed", and each has a different fix. If no app is running, start the project's own dev script from `package.json` in the background yourself and tell the user in one line that it is running and how to stop it: never a second one, never a guessed command, never kill anything, and the permission prompt is your host's. If one IS running, the app is not the missing piece and the SDK is; do not send the user to start what they already started.

## 2. Name the consequence BEFORE you act

This is the whole method. An expectation written after you see the result can be talked into agreeing with whatever happened; one written before cannot.

```
reticle_snapshot({ sessionId, mode: "interactive" })   // controls only, with refs

reticle_act_and_wait({ sessionId, ref, action: "click", until: { kind: "allOf", predicates: [
  { kind: "net",     method: "POST", urlContains: "/api/...", status: 200 },
  { kind: "element", query: { testid: "..." } },
  { kind: "console", level: "error", absent: true },
]}})
```

Multi-step journey? Drive it in one call with `reticle_act_sequence`, then assert the outcome once. Do not act → snapshot → act → snapshot: it proves the same thing at several times the cost.

**Only `reticle_act_and_wait` and `reticle_assert` produce a verdict.** `reticle_act`, `snapshot`, `query`, `navigate`, `network` and `console` move or read the app and prove nothing. A drive that ends without one of the first two has no result, however many calls it made.

## 3. Read the verdict honestly

| `verified` | means | do |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `yes` | the consequence you named happened | report it, with the evidence |
| `no` | it did not happen, or a channel contradicted the UI | a real finding: report it with `because` |
| `unknown` | Reticle drove the app and could not tell | **not a pass.** Say unknown and say why |

On `unknown` / `unsettled`, re-assert rather than re-driving: `reticle_assert({ predicate, since, timeout_ms: 8000 })` using the `since` from the act result. Re-driving repeats a side effect that already happened.

**Never weaken a check to turn a verdict green.** An assertion edited until it passes proves nothing.

## 4. Check what you did not touch

```
reticle_run({ tool: "reticle_verify", sessionId, args: { action: "coverage" } })   // { total, exercised, untouched }
```

If `untouched` still holds controls your change affects, the drive is unfinished. One call, and it is the cheapest guard against reporting a pass over the half you never opened.

## 5. Report

State what you drove, what the verdict was, and the evidence: the request and status, the state that changed, the app's own signal. If something failed, `reticle_inspect({ sessionId, ref })` on the failing element gives the `file:line`: put it in the report.

Then `reticle_session({ action: "yield", mode: "waiting" })` so the human's panel stops reading "live".

---

More detail, fetchable one page at a time: `curl https://docs.reticle.sh/llms.txt` for the index, then the single page you need (`tools-act-and-wait.md`, `predicates.md`, `troubleshooting.md`). If Reticle itself misbehaves, file it with `reticle_feedback`: one call, then carry on.
SKILLSkill
reticleSkill

Install, instrument and verify this running web app from the inside (DOM, network, routing, console and framework state) instead of screenshots or guessing. Drives one real flow end to end and returns a verdict with the file:line to fix. Use when the user asks to set up or install Reticle, when a user-facing change needs proving before you call it done, when a test passes but the UI is broken, or when the user types /reticle.

agentic-tddSkill

Test-driven development for behaviour a unit test cannot reach, by writing the expectation against the running app before writing the code. Declare the consequence first, watch it fail, implement, watch it pass. Use when building a user-facing feature, when the user asks for TDD on UI or full-stack work, when a unit test cannot express the outcome that matters, or when you want a red-green loop that runs against the real app instead of mocks.

audit-my-appSkill

Sweep a whole running web app for what is broken, without writing a script or knowing the codebase. Clicks every reachable control and reports dead buttons, console errors, failed requests, and places where the API and the screen disagree. Use on an unfamiliar codebase, before a release, after a big merge or dependency bump, when the user asks for a smoke test or a health check, or when someone says "just check everything still works".

debug-broken-uiSkill

Find out why something in a running web app does not work, when the console is empty and the code looks correct. Reads the click, the request, the store and the console together and returns the file:line to open. Use when a button does nothing, a form will not submit, data will not load, a page renders blank or stale, a modal will not close, or the user says "it's broken" and the code review says it is fine.

design-system-complianceSkill

Check that the UI you actually rendered uses the design system, by reading computed styles in the running app against the project's design tokens. Catches hardcoded hex colors, off-palette backgrounds, invisible or unusable controls, and animations that never ran. Use after building or restyling a component, when a design review is wanted, when a UI looks slightly off but nobody can say why, or when a design system exists and nothing checks whether the code follows it.

drive-desktop-appSkill

Drive and verify an Electron or Tauri desktop app from the inside, including the main-process and Rust IPC calls a browser tool cannot see. Use when a desktop app needs testing, when a feature works in the browser but not in the packaged app, when an IPC or invoke call needs proving, when a desktop screenshot or visual diff is wanted, or when you need a headless run of a desktop UI in CI.

false-green-testsSkill

Find out why the tests pass but the app is broken. Catches false greens: a green suite over a feature that does not work, a mocked API standing in for a real one, an assertion that holds no matter what the app does, a click handler wired to nothing. Use when the suite is green and the user says it is broken, when a test never fails, when coverage looks fine but bugs still ship, or before trusting a passing run you did not watch.