Skip to main content
ClaudeWave
Skill1.2k repo starsupdated 10d ago

design-first

The design-first skill guides the creation of technical design documents before implementation, producing architecture diagrams, data models, API definitions, and trade-off analyses across multiple approaches. Use this when planning features, architecting systems, designing APIs, or exploring implementation strategies, particularly for complex projects involving multiple components, ambiguous requirements, or significant architectural decisions.

Install in Claude Code
Copy
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohitg00/skillkit /tmp/design-first && cp -r /tmp/design-first/packages/core/src/methodology/packs/planning/design-first ~/.claude/skills/design-first
Then start a new Claude Code session; the skill loads automatically.

SKILL.md

# Design First Methodology

You are following a design-first approach. Before writing any code, design the solution.

## Core Principle

**Think first, code second.**

## When to Use Design First

Apply this methodology when:

- Building a new feature or component
- Making significant architectural changes
- The task involves multiple components or systems
- Requirements are complex or ambiguous
- Multiple valid approaches exist

Skip for trivial changes (typos, simple bug fixes, config changes).

## Design Process

### Phase 1: Understand the Problem

Before designing, ensure clarity on:

**Requirements Checklist:**
- [ ] What is the user/business need?
- [ ] What are the inputs and outputs?
- [ ] What are the constraints (performance, security, compatibility)?
- [ ] What are the edge cases?
- [ ] What are the non-requirements (out of scope)?

**Questions to Ask:**
- What exactly should this do?
- What should it NOT do?
- How will users interact with it?
- How will it integrate with existing systems?
- What happens when things go wrong?

### Phase 2: Explore Options

Generate multiple approaches before choosing:

```markdown
## Option A: [Approach Name]

**Description:** [Brief explanation]

**Pros:**
- [Advantage 1]
- [Advantage 2]

**Cons:**
- [Disadvantage 1]
- [Disadvantage 2]

**Complexity:** Low/Medium/High

---

## Option B: [Approach Name]
...
```

Evaluate options against:
- Requirements fit
- Implementation complexity
- Maintenance burden
- Performance characteristics
- Team familiarity

### Phase 3: Design the Solution

Create a design document covering:

#### System Overview
```
┌─────────────┐    ┌─────────────┐    ┌─────────────┐
│   Client    │───▶│   Service   │───▶│  Database   │
└─────────────┘    └─────────────┘    └─────────────┘
```

#### Data Model
```typescript
interface Order {
  id: string;
  customerId: string;
  items: OrderItem[];
  status: OrderStatus;
  createdAt: Date;
  total: Money;
}
```

#### API/Interface Design
```typescript
// Public interface
interface OrderService {
  createOrder(customerId: string, items: OrderItem[]): Promise<Order>;
  getOrder(orderId: string): Promise<Order | null>;
  cancelOrder(orderId: string): Promise<void>;
}
```

#### Key Algorithms/Logic
```
Order Total Calculation:
1. Sum item prices (price × quantity)
2. Apply discounts (percentage-based first, then fixed)
3. Calculate tax (rate based on customer location)
4. Add shipping (free over threshold, otherwise flat rate)
```

#### Error Handling
- What errors can occur?
- How should they be handled?
- What should users see?

### Phase 4: Validate the Design

Before implementing, validate:

**Self-Review:**
- Does it meet all requirements?
- Are there simpler alternatives?
- What could go wrong?
- Is it testable?

**External Validation:**
- Rubber duck explanation (explain to yourself/others)
- Quick review with teammate
- Check against similar patterns in codebase

## Design Document Template

Use `DESIGN_TEMPLATE.md` as the standard artifact for each feature. It covers:

- **Overview** — one-paragraph summary of what is being built and why
- **Requirements** — functional and non-functional (performance, security)
- **Architecture** — component diagram and explanation
- **Data Model** — entity definitions and relationships
- **API Design** — interface definitions
- **Key Decisions** — decision table with options considered, choice made, and rationale
- **Implementation Plan** — ordered steps
- **Testing Strategy** — unit and integration test scope
- **Open Questions** — unresolved items

Create this file at the start of each design session and keep it updated as the design evolves.

## Design Levels

### High-Level Design (Architecture)
- System components and their interactions
- Data flow between systems
- Technology choices
- Deployment architecture

### Mid-Level Design (Module/Component)
- Class/module structure
- Interfaces and contracts
- State management
- Error handling strategy

### Low-Level Design (Implementation)
- Algorithm details
- Data structures
- Method signatures
- Edge case handling

## Anti-Patterns to Avoid

| Anti-Pattern | Mitigation |
|---|---|
| Big Design Up Front (BDUF) | Design enough to start; refine as you learn |
| Analysis Paralysis | Time-box the design phase; decide at 70% confidence |
| Design in Isolation | Align with existing codebase patterns and team conventions |

## Integration with Implementation

After design is approved:

1. **Review the design** one more time before coding
2. **Break into tasks** using task-decomposition skill
3. **Implement incrementally** - verify design assumptions as you code
4. **Update design** if you discover issues during implementation

The design document is living — update it as you learn.

## Signals You Need More Design

- "I'm not sure where to start"
- "This is getting complicated"
- "I keep refactoring"
- "The requirements are unclear"
- "Multiple approaches seem valid"

Stop and design before proceeding.
handoff-protocolsSkill

Manages work transitions between team members or agents by creating structured handoff documents, summarizing project status, documenting key decisions, blockers, and open questions, and generating onboarding briefs. Use when someone needs to hand off, hand over, or transition a project; pass work to another person or agent; brief a colleague taking over; prepare a shift change summary; or onboard someone mid-task. Produces ready-to-use handoff documents covering current status, next steps, known issues, technical context, and communication templates for both planned and unplanned transfers.

parallel-investigationSkill

Coordinates parallel investigation threads to simultaneously explore multiple hypotheses or root causes across different system areas. Use when debugging production incidents, slow API performance, multi-system integration failures, or complex bugs where the root cause is unclear and multiple plausible theories exist; when serial troubleshooting is too slow; or when multiple investigators can divide root-cause analysis work. Provides structured phases for problem decomposition, thread assignment, sync points with Continue/Pivot/Converge decisions, and final report synthesis.

structured-code-reviewSkill

Performs a structured five-stage code review covering requirements compliance, correctness, code quality, testing, and security/performance. Each stage uses targeted checklists and categorized feedback (Blocker/Major/Minor/Nit) with actionable suggestions and rationale. Use when the user asks for code review, PR feedback, pull request review, or wants their code checked for bugs, style issues, or vulnerabilities — triggered by phrases like "review my code", "check this PR", "review my changes", "pull request review", or "code feedback".

hypothesis-testingSkill

Applies the scientific method to debugging by helping users form specific, testable hypotheses, design targeted experiments, and systematically confirm or reject theories to find root causes. Use when a user says their code isn't working, they're getting an error, something broke, they want to troubleshoot a bug, or they're trying to figure out what's causing an issue. Concrete actions include isolating failing components, forming and testing hypotheses, analyzing error messages, tracing execution paths, and interpreting test results to narrow down root causes.

root-cause-analysisSkill

Performs systematic root cause analysis to identify the true source of bugs, errors, and unexpected behavior through structured investigation phases — not just treating symptoms. Use when a user reports a bug, crash, error, or broken behavior and needs to debug, troubleshoot, or investigate why something is not working; especially for complex or intermittent issues across multiple components. Applies the Five Whys method, hypothesis-driven testing, stack trace analysis, git blame/log evidence gathering, and causal chain documentation to isolate and confirm root causes before applying any fix.

trace-and-isolateSkill

Applies systematic tracing and isolation techniques to pinpoint exactly where a bug originates in code. Use when a bug is hard to locate, code is not working as expected, an error or crash appears with unclear cause, a regression was introduced between recent commits, or you need to narrow down which component, function, or line is faulty. Covers binary search debugging, git bisect for regressions, strategic logging with [TRACE] patterns, data and control flow tracing, component isolation, minimal reproduction cases, conditional breakpoints, and watch expressions across TypeScript, SQL, and bash.

skill-authoringSkill

Creates and structures SKILL.md files for AI coding agents, including YAML frontmatter, trigger phrases, directive instructions, decision trees, code examples, and verification checklists. Use when the user asks to write a new skill, create a skill file, author agent capabilities, generate skill documentation, or define a skill template for Claude Code agents.

task-decompositionSkill

Breaks down complex software, writing, or research tasks into small, atomic, independently completable units with dependency graphs and milestone breakdowns. Use when the user asks to plan a project, decompose a feature, create subtasks, split up work, or needs help organizing a large piece of work into a step-by-step plan. Triggered by phrases like "break down", "decompose", "where do I start", "too big", "split into tasks", "work breakdown", or "task list".