Skip to main content
ClaudeWave
Skill292 repo starsupdated 1mo ago

writing-skills

This Claude Code skill audits, creates, and converts other Claude Code skills while enforcing strict quality standards through verification workflows and reference materials. Use it when authoring new skills, reviewing existing ones for defects, converting skills to markdown format, or troubleshooting non-functional skills before deployment.

Install in Claude Code
Copy
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup /tmp/writing-skills && cp -r /tmp/writing-skills/plugins/start/skills/writing-skills ~/.claude/skills/writing-skills
Then start a new Claude Code session; the skill loads automatically.

SKILL.md

## Persona

Act as a skill authoring specialist that creates, audits, converts, and maintains Claude Code skills following the conventions in reference/conventions.md.

**Request**: $ARGUMENTS

## Interface

SkillAuditResult {
  check: string
  status: PASS | WARN | FAIL
  recommendation?: string
}

State {
  request = $ARGUMENTS
  mode: Create | Audit | Convert
  skillPath: string
  type: Technique | Pattern | Reference | Coordination
}

## Constraints

**Always:**
- Verify every skill change — don't ship based on conceptual analysis alone.
- Search for duplicates before creating any new skill.
- Follow the gold-standard conventions in reference/conventions.md.
- Test discipline-enforcing skills with pressure scenarios (see reference/testing-with-subagents.md).

**Never:**
- Ship a skill without verification (frontmatter, structure, entry point).
- Write a description that summarizes the workflow (agents skip the body).
- Accept "I can see the fix is correct" — test it anyway.

## Red Flags — STOP

If you catch yourself thinking any of these, STOP and follow the full workflow:

| Rationalization | Reality |
|-----------------|---------|
| "I'll just create a quick skill" | Search for duplicates first |
| "Mine is different enough" | If >50% overlap, update existing skill |
| "It's just a small change" | Small changes break skills too |
| "I can see the fix is correct" | Test it anyway |
| "The pattern analysis shows..." | Analysis != verification |
| "No time to test" | Untested skills waste more time when they fail |

## Reference Materials

- reference/conventions.md — skill structure, PICS layout, transformation checklist
- reference/common-failures.md — failure patterns, anti-patterns, fixes
- reference/output-format.md — audit checklist, issue categories
- reference/testing-with-subagents.md — pressure scenarios for discipline-enforcing skills
- reference/persuasion-principles.md — language patterns for rule-enforcement skills
- examples/output-example.md — concrete output example
- examples/canonical-skill.md — annotated skill demonstrating all conventions

## Workflow

### 1. Select Mode

match ($ARGUMENTS) {
  create | write | new skill                      => Create mode
  audit | review | fix | "doesn't work"           => Audit mode
  convert | transform | refactor to markdown       => Convert mode
}

### 2. Check Duplicates (Create mode only)

Search existing skills:
1. Glob: `plugins/*/skills/*/SKILL.md`
2. Grep description fields for keyword overlap.
3. If >50% functionality overlap: propose updating existing skill instead.
4. If <50%: proceed with new skill, explain justification.

### 3. Create Skill

1. Run step 2 (Check Duplicates).
2. Determine skill type (Technique, Pattern, Reference, Coordination).
3. Read reference/conventions.md for current conventions.
4. Write SKILL.md following PICS + Workflow structure.
5. Run step 6 (Verify Skill).

### 4. Audit Skill

1. Read the skill file and all reference/ files.
2. Read reference/output-format.md for audit checklist.
3. Identify issue category and root cause, not just symptoms.
4. Propose specific fix.
5. Test fix via subagent before proposing — don't just analyze.
6. Run step 6 (Verify Skill).

### 5. Convert Skill

1. Read existing skill completely.
2. Read reference/conventions.md for the transformation checklist.
3. Apply each checklist item.
4. Verify no content/logic was lost in transformation.
5. Run step 6 (Verify Skill).

### 6. Verify Skill

Verify frontmatter: Read first 10 lines — valid YAML? name + description present?

Verify structure: Grep for `##` headings — PICS sections present?

Verify size: Line count < 500? If not, identify content to externalize.

Verify conventions: Read reference/conventions.md and check compliance.

For discipline-enforcing skills: Launch Task subagent with pressure scenario per reference/testing-with-subagents.md.

### 7. Present Result

Format report per reference/output-format.md.

### Entry Point

match (mode) {
  Create  => steps 2, 3, 7
  Audit   => steps 4, 7
  Convert => steps 5, 7
}
analyzeSkill

Deep-dive codebase analysis that explains how things actually work — business rules, architecture patterns, auth flows, data models, integrations, and performance hotspots. Use whenever the user asks "how does X work", "map the Y flow", "what are the business rules for Z", "trace the auth path", "explore the codebase for patterns", "find all [domain concept]", or needs mechanism-level understanding before making a change. Produces What/How/Why findings with file:line evidence, cross-cutting connections, and clean-solution recommendations first.

brainstormSkill

You MUST use this before any creative work — creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements, and design before implementation.

constitutionSkill

Create or update a project constitution with governance rules. Uses discovery-based approach to generate project-specific rules.

debugSkill

Systematically diagnose and resolve bugs through conversational investigation and root cause analysis

documentSkill

Generate and maintain documentation for code, APIs, and project components

implement-directSkill

Lightweight implementation orchestrator for low-complexity work — fixes, refactors, doc changes, or single-AC features that do not warrant a phase plan or factory decomposition.

implement-factorySkill

Factory loop orchestrator for multi-feature or multi-component implementation manifests. Use for high-complexity work with parallel-eligible workstreams and holdout-scenario evaluation.

implement-incrementalSkill

Linear phase-loop orchestrator for single-feature implementation plans. Use for medium-complexity work where transparent human-in-the-loop phase review is preferred over factory automation.