exploratory-data-analysis
Perform systematic exploratory data analysis to understand dataset structure, distributions, relationships, and anomalies before modeling. Use when a dataset is new, its quality is unknown, or the user requests open-ended profiling; use data-analysis instead for a defined hypothesis or decision question.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/seb1n/awesome-ai-agent-skills /tmp/exploratory-data-analysis && cp -r /tmp/exploratory-data-analysis/data-and-analytics/exploratory-data-analysis ~/.claude/skills/exploratory-data-analysisSKILL.md
# Exploratory Data Analysis
This skill enables an AI agent to perform structured exploratory data analysis (EDA) on any tabular dataset. The agent systematically profiles the data's shape and types, examines distributions, computes correlations, detects outliers, and produces a summary of findings. EDA is the critical first step before any modeling or reporting — it reveals what the data actually contains versus what it is assumed to contain.
## Workflow
1. **Load and inspect basic structure.** Read the dataset and immediately report its shape (rows, columns), column names, data types, and memory footprint. Display the first 5 and last 5 rows to catch header issues, trailing garbage rows, or encoding artifacts. This takes under a second but prevents hours of downstream confusion.
2. **Assess data quality.** Count nulls per column as both absolute and percentage. Identify columns with zero variance (constant values), high cardinality categoricals (e.g., a "notes" field with unique values per row), and mixed-type columns. Build a concise quality scorecard: columns with >5% missing, columns with suspicious types, and duplicate row counts.
3. **Analyze distributions of individual variables.** For numeric columns, compute mean, median, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis. Plot histograms or KDE plots. For categorical columns, show value counts and proportions for the top 10 categories. Flag highly imbalanced distributions (e.g., a binary target where one class is under 5%).
4. **Explore relationships between variables.** Compute the full correlation matrix for numeric columns and visualize it as a heatmap. For categorical-vs-numeric relationships, use grouped box plots or violin plots. For categorical-vs-categorical, use contingency tables or mosaic plots. Highlight pairs with correlation above 0.7 or below -0.7.
5. **Detect outliers and anomalies.** Apply the IQR method to every numeric column and report the count and percentage of outlier values. Visualize outliers with box plots. Cross-reference outliers across columns — a row that is an outlier in multiple columns simultaneously often represents a data entry error or a genuinely unusual observation.
6. **Synthesize findings into an EDA report.** Write a structured summary covering: dataset overview, quality issues found, key distribution characteristics, notable correlations, outlier summary, and recommended next steps (e.g., columns to drop, transformations to apply, features likely to be predictive).
## Supported Technologies
- **pandas** — data loading and profiling
- **matplotlib / seaborn** — distribution and correlation visualizations
- **ydata-profiling** (formerly pandas-profiling) — automated EDA report generation
- **scipy.stats** — statistical tests for distribution analysis
## Usage
Provide the agent with the dataset file path. Optionally specify target columns of interest, maximum categories to display for categorical variables, and whether to generate an automated HTML report. The agent will return both visual outputs and a text summary of findings.
## Examples
### Example 1: Full EDA on a dataset
```python
import pandas as pd
import seaborn as sns
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
df = pd.read_csv("employee_attrition.csv")
# Step 1: Structure
print(f"Shape: {df.shape}") # Shape: (1470, 35)
print(f"Dtypes:\n{df.dtypes.value_counts()}")
# int64 26
# object 9
# Step 2: Data quality
print(f"\nNull counts:\n{df.isnull().sum().loc[lambda x: x > 0]}")
# monthly_income 12
# years_at_company 8
print(f"Duplicates: {df.duplicated().sum()}") # Duplicates: 3
# Step 3: Distributions
print(f"\nNumeric summary:\n{df[['age', 'monthly_income', 'years_at_company']].describe()}")
# age monthly_income years_at_company
# mean 36.9 6502.93 7.01
# std 9.1 4707.96 6.13
# min 18.0 1009.00 0.00
# 50% 36.0 4919.00 5.00
# max 60.0 19999.00 40.00
print(f"\nAttrition distribution:\n{df['attrition'].value_counts(normalize=True)}")
# No 0.839
# Yes 0.161 <-- imbalanced target
# Step 4: Correlations
corr = df.select_dtypes(include="number").corr()
high_corr = corr.where(
(corr.abs() > 0.7) & (corr != 1.0)
).stack().dropna()
print(f"\nHigh correlations:\n{high_corr}")
# monthly_income job_level 0.95
# total_working_years job_level 0.78
# years_at_company years_in_role 0.76
# Step 5: Outlier summary
for col in ["monthly_income", "years_at_company"]:
Q1, Q3 = df[col].quantile(0.25), df[col].quantile(0.75)
IQR = Q3 - Q1
outliers = ((df[col] < Q1 - 1.5 * IQR) | (df[col] > Q3 + 1.5 * IQR)).sum()
print(f"{col}: {outliers} outliers ({outliers/len(df)*100:.1f}%)")
# monthly_income: 0 outliers (0.0%)
# years_at_company: 47 outliers (3.2%)
# Visualization: correlation heatmap
plt.figure(figsize=(12, 10))
sns.heatmap(corr, cmap="coolwarm", center=0, annot=False, square=True)
plt.title("Feature Correlation Matrix")
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig("eda_correlation_heatmap.png", dpi=150)
```
### Example 2: Automated EDA report generation
```python
from ydata_profiling import ProfileReport
import pandas as pd
df = pd.read_csv("employee_attrition.csv")
# Generate a comprehensive HTML report
profile = ProfileReport(
df,
title="Employee Attrition EDA Report",
explorative=True,
correlations={
"pearson": {"calculate": True},
"spearman": {"calculate": True},
"phi_k": {"calculate": True}
},
missing_diagrams={
"bar": True,
"matrix": True,
"heatmap": True
}
)
profile.to_file("eda_report.html")
# Generates a full interactive report including:
# - Dataset overview (size, types, missing cells, duplicates)
# - Per-variable analysis (stats, histogram, common/extreme values)
# - Correlation matrices (Pearson, Spearman, Phi-K)
# - Missing value patterns (bar chart, matrix, nullityDesign reproducible evaluations for AI agents with representative task sets, explicit rubrics, appropriate graders, baselines, regression gates, and failure analysis. Use when defining agent quality, comparing prompts or models, validating a release, measuring tool-use reliability, investigating regressions, or deciding whether an agent is ready for production.
Design privacy-aware observability for AI agents using traces, spans, structured events, metrics, cost attribution, dashboards, alerts, and investigation workflows. Use when instrumenting an agent, debugging intermittent tool or model failures, defining service-level objectives, analyzing latency or spend, auditing agent decisions, or preparing production monitoring.
Design and verify auditable human oversight, approval gates, escalation paths, and safe state transitions for AI agent workflows. Use when deciding which agent actions require review, adding approve/reject or dual-control flows, preventing unauthorized autonomous effects, creating decision records, reducing rubber-stamping, or recovering safely from rejected, expired, or failed actions.
Design, implement, harden, and verify Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers with precise tool contracts, least-privilege authorization, safe transports, structured errors, and interoperability tests. Use when creating a new MCP server, exposing an API or data source through MCP, reviewing an MCP server design, adding or revising MCP tools, or preparing an MCP server for production.
Design and operate bounded multi-agent workflows with task decomposition, dependency graphs, ownership, handoff contracts, shared-state controls, approvals, recovery, and synthesis. Use when a task contains genuinely independent workstreams, specialized roles, parallel research or implementation, reviewer-worker loops, or coordination problems that one agent should not execute sequentially.
Design and validate model-facing tool definitions with clear names, action-oriented descriptions, bounded JSON Schema parameters, explicit side effects, safe defaults, idempotency, errors, and realistic tests. Use when creating function-calling tools, MCP tools, agent actions, structured tool inputs, or when a model selects the wrong tool, invents arguments, or causes unsafe side effects.
Plan, execute, document, and retest authorized security assessments of AI agents and multi-agent workflows using safe adversarial cases, synthetic identities, canaries, and evidence-based findings. Use when defining red-team rules of engagement, assessing prompt injection or excessive agency, testing tool and identity boundaries, evaluating memory or cross-agent attacks, scoring a campaign, or verifying remediation in an approved environment.
Threat-model and harden AI agents, RAG systems, assistants, and tool-using workflows against direct, indirect, stored, cross-agent, and multimodal prompt injection. Use when reviewing an agent architecture, isolating untrusted content, constraining tools and egress, protecting secrets, adding injection-focused tests, investigating a suspected injection incident, or documenting residual prompt-injection risk.