git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/serejaris/personal-corp-os /tmp/safe-public-release && cp -r /tmp/safe-public-release/skills/safe-public-release ~/.claude/skills/safe-public-releaseSKILL.md
# Safe Public Release Turn a private, vendor-provided, runtime-generated, or mixed artifact into a public package without leaking secrets, private state, or material that cannot be redistributed. One pipeline: `intent → owner issue tree → inventory → provenance → license → security/privacy → allowlist → clean package → approval → publish → fresh public verification → maintenance` The skill is **allowlist-first**. Never copy a whole runtime/private directory and hope denylist cleanup finds everything. ## Hard safety boundary Publishing is an outward mutation. Before creating a public repository, changing visibility, pushing a release, or publishing to a registry: 1. complete the inventory and release manifest; 2. reach `PACKAGE-READY` with no unresolved provenance/license/security blockers; 3. show the user the release dry run; 4. receive explicit approval for the named public target and artifact set. A request to "prepare" or "review" a release authorizes read-only analysis and private/internal artifacts, not public publication. ## What this skill is for - public agent skills or plugin bundles; - prompts, templates, playbooks, starter kits, examples; - reusable source extracted from a private project; - workshop/course assets selected for public release; - benchmark fixtures or datasets; - demo repos derived from production/private work; - vendor/runtime exports with uncertain provenance; - moving an existing private repo or selected subtree to a public repo. ## What this skill is NOT for - **Upstream bugfix PR:** use the repository's contribution/PR workflow and regression tests. - **Security vulnerability disclosure:** use the vendor's private security route. - **Tool/product evaluation:** route to the product/runtime owner; evaluation does not grant redistribution rights. - **Creating a private corp-* department:** use `corp-new`; it requires a separate approval dry run. - **Simple public edit:** when the source is already public, owner-authored, clearly licensed, and contains no mixed private/runtime state, use the normal repository workflow. ## Setup Resolve configuration from the user, project instructions, then defaults: ```markdown ## Safe Public Release Config - internal_owner_repo: owner/corp-opensource-or-project - public_github_owner: owner - staging_root: /tmp/safe-public-release - allowed_public_licenses: MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD-2-Clause, BSD-3-Clause - secret_scanners: gitleaks, trufflehog - approval_mode: explicit-before-publish ``` Do not block preparation when optional scanners are unavailable. Record the limitation and keep the release blocked until equivalent manual and repository-native checks are completed. Never claim a scan ran when it did not. ## Owner issue tree Before extraction or packaging, find or create three scopes in the internal owner repo: 1. **Owner epic** — intended release, audience, source, risk owner, definition of done. 2. **Inventory/review child** — provenance, licenses, companion files, security classification, allowlist. 3. **Publish/verify child** — public repo/package creation after approval, fresh-clone verification, maintenance. Separate unrelated work: - product/tool smoke → product/runtime owner; - runner or CI provisioning → infrastructure owner; - launch content/distribution → media/community owner; - commercial negotiation → sales/CRM owner. If the user has an issue-management skill such as `manager`, use it for the issue tree and cross-repo links. ## Status model Use exactly one current status: ### Progress states - `DISCOVERED` - `INVENTORY` - `PROVENANCE-CLEARED` - `LICENSE-CLEARED` - `SECURITY-CLEARED` - `PACKAGE-READY` - `APPROVED` - `PUBLISHED` - `VERIFIED` - `MAINTAINED` ### Block states - `BLOCKED-PROVENANCE` - `BLOCKED-LICENSE` - `BLOCKED-SECURITY` - `BLOCKED-OWNER-APPROVAL` - `NO-GO-VENDOR-PROTECTED` - `NO-GO-MIXED-PRIVATE-DATA` Every blocked status needs one concrete `unblock_event`: source found, written permission, license clarified, secret removed and rotated, scope reduced, or owner approval. ## Step 1 — Capture the release intent Record: - intended public artifact/repository; - target audience and use case; - source environments/repositories/providers; - expected bundles; - intended public license; - owner who can approve publication; - maintenance owner after publication. Do not create the public repository yet. ## Step 2 — Inventory before copying Create `release-manifest.yaml` using [the bundled template](references/release-manifest.example.yaml). For each candidate artifact record: - stable artifact ID; - source provider/owner; - source version, tag, commit, or product version; - source locator in an **internal** note; public manifest must not contain private absolute paths or internal URLs; - original license/terms; - redistribution basis; - whether it was modified and how; - complete companion-file bundle; - exclusions and reason; - current decision. Visibility inside an application or runtime does not prove ownership or permission to redistribute. ## Step 3 — Classify every file | Class | Default decision | |---|---| | Owner-authored source | Candidate after license/security review | | Third-party redistributable source | Candidate with preserved notices | | Generated build artifact | Regenerate from allowlisted source | | Runtime state, cache, queue, session | Exclude | | Logs, transcripts, histories | Exclude or separate privacy review | | Credentials, tokens, cookies, keys | Exclude; rotate if exposed | | Customer, student, employee, user data | Exclude; aggregate only under a separate privacy owner | | Vendor-protected or unknown source | Block | | Mixed bundle | Split before review | | Symlink, submodule, archive, binary | Inspect target/content and license before allowlist | Every file in the future public tree must be reachable from an explicit allowlist entry. ## Step 4 — Provenance gate For each candidate prove: - who authored/owns it; - which exact version is
Use when managing Paperclip AI agent companies - creating tasks, managing agents, approving hires, running heartbeats, or any Paperclip control-plane operations via CLI or REST API. Triggers on "paperclip", "задача агенту", "одобри найм", "heartbeat", "запусти агента".
Orchestrate iterative visual style searches with branch prompts, decision graphs, feedback loops, and final direction selection.
Use when user asks for Claude Code usage stats, weekly analytics, project activity summary, or wants to see what projects were worked on. Triggers on "аналитика", "статистика claude", "cc stats", "weekly report", "что делал
Use when needing strategic project analysis from multiple independent expert perspectives. Triggers on business decisions, growth strategy, product direction, competitive analysis, or any situation where diverse C-level opinions reduce blind spots
Use when creating or refactoring CLAUDE.md files - enforces best practices for size, structure, and content organization
>-
>-
>-