recipe-front-design

**Explicit User Instruction**: The user explicitly instructs and authorizes every subagent call named in this recipe. Execute each applicable call when its prerequisites are met.

Execute Skill: documentation-criteria before document routing or creation.
Execute Skill: llm-friendly-context before writing Agent prompts, handoffs, or generated artifacts.
Execute Skill: subagents-orchestration-guide before invoking agents or resolving findings.
Before the first finding disposition, read `references/review-resolution.md` from the loaded subagents-orchestration-guide skill.

## Outcome and Ownership

Coordinate a Medium/Large frontend design from evidence to an applicable UI Spec and approved Design Doc. The orchestrator owns requirement convergence, Structural Scale, document routing, ADR qualification, evidence selection, and Review Resolution. Named specialists own semantic investigation and artifacts.

The frontend Design Doc always carries the complete implementation design. An ADR batch narrows qualifying technical choices; an applicable UI Spec owns UI structure and behavior that remain to be designed.

Requirements: $ARGUMENTS

## Flow

```text
requirement source -> codebase-analyzer -> scope/document routing confirmation [Stop]
                                               |
                             conditional UI analysis -> UI Spec review [Stop]
                                               |
                                   optional ADR batch/review [Stop]
                                               |
              Design Doc -> code-verifier/Resolution -> document-reviewer
                                               |
                               design-sync -> approval [Stop]
```

Use Review Resolution for every actionable finding. Wait at each `[Stop]` for explicit user confirmation.

At each Agent invocation below, build the prompt as a mechanical extraction: copy the named source values into the exact fields, apply only the declared serialization, then invoke immediately.

## Step 1: Select the Governing Requirement Source

Use the approved PRD path when one exists. Otherwise use the confirmed requirements verbatim.

Set `confirmed_requirement_context` to the approved PRD path exactly. Only when no approved PRD exists, use the orchestrator-confirmed convergence record unchanged.

## Step 2: Collect Repository Decision Material

Invoke `dev-workflows-fullstack:codebase-analyzer` once for the complete confirmed scope with exactly `prd_path: [approved PRD path]`, or `requirements: [confirmed requirements verbatim]` when no approved PRD exists.

Require one valid JSON result and let the analyzer discover affected paths, responsibility boundaries, and cross-layer contracts. Treat `focusAreas` as existing-behavior safeguards rather than requirements.

This independent discovery keeps scope and option convergence grounded in repository evidence rather than the orchestrator's unverified implementation hypothesis.

## Step 3: Determine UI Spec Applicability and Resolve UI Evidence

Apply the documentation-criteria UI Spec creation condition. When it does not apply, skip UI analysis and Step 5.

When a UI Spec applies, load and apply `external-resource-context` only when an external resource can change the current UI direction, component contract, or verification boundary. Otherwise use `external_resource_refs: []`.

Ask for prototype code only when it supplies an unresolved approved UI decision or the target cannot be determined from requirements, repository UI, and recorded resources. A missing optional prototype is not a stop condition.

Invoke `dev-workflows-fullstack:ui-analyzer` with exactly one governing source:

```text
prd_path: [approved PRD path]
```

or, when no approved PRD exists:

```text
requirements: [confirmed requirements verbatim]
```

Add only an existing `ui_spec_path`, a decision-relevant `prototype_path`, and selected `external_resource_refs` or `[]`.

```text
ui_spec_path: [existing UI Spec path]
prototype_path: [decision-relevant path]
external_resource_refs: [selected references or []]
```

## Step 4: Confirm Scope and ADR Decisions

Execute Skill: requirement-convergence. Build and judge the convergence record from the governing requirement source, repository analysis, and applicable UI analysis.

Judge all four convergence fields. Assign `cost` from Step 2 structural evidence and record its unknowns; run the hearing only for fields below `ready`.

Determine Structural Scale from outcomes and responsibility boundaries; file count is supporting evidence only. Resolve candidate decision points against the governing source, `reuse`, and `invalidations`; applicable UI facts may support or contradict the remaining options. Apply documentation-criteria Choice and Durability filters only after this convergence and record passing points as `adrDecisionPoints`; an empty list is valid.

Present the confirmed outcome and requirements, cost band with its structural evidence and unknowns, exclusions, affected responsibilities, Structural Scale, UI Spec applicability, and qualifying ADR points or none. Offer proceed, or correct and re-run. Ask a question only when its answer can change a convergence field, the confirmed outcome, or scope. Continue only when every convergence field is `ready` or `weak-but-explicit`. `[Stop: Scope confirmation]`.

## Step 5: Create and Approve the UI Spec

Run this step only when Step 3 determined that a UI Spec applies.

Invoke `dev-workflows-fullstack:ui-spec-designer` with exact inputs:

```text
confirmed_requirement_context: [the value fixed in Step 1]
ui_analysis: [complete Step 3 UI analyzer JSON unchanged]
codebase_analysis: [complete Step 2 codebase-analyzer JSON unchanged]
prototype_path: [decision-relevant path from Step 3 exactly, or absent]
external_resource_refs: [selected Step 3 reference records unchanged, or []]
```

Invoke `dev-workflows-fullstack:document-reviewer` with exact inputs: `doc_type: UISpec` and