Skip to main content
ClaudeWave
EN, English
Skill1.9k repo starsupdated 5d ago

status-report

The status-report skill generates concise weekly, monthly, or quarterly progress summaries optimized for rapid consumption by managers and stakeholders. It structures outputs into shipped items, in-flight work with ETAs, blockers requiring action, optional metrics, and prioritized next steps, using plain language and outcome-focused bullets rather than activity descriptions. Use this skill when users request status updates, project summaries, or progress reports at any cadence from daily standups to quarterly reviews.

Install in Claude Code
Copy
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shiwenwen/hope-agent /tmp/status-report && cp -r /tmp/status-report/skills/status-report ~/.claude/skills/status-report
Then start a new Claude Code session; the skill loads automatically.

SKILL.md

# Status Report

## When to Use

Trigger phrases: "weekly update", "monthly report", "status report", "project update", "1:1 prep", "周报", "月报", "工作汇报".

Match the cadence implied by the request:
- **Daily / standup**: 3 bullets max, "yesterday / today / blockers"
- **Weekly**: full template below
- **Monthly**: weekly template + "themes" section + metrics over time
- **Quarterly / OKR**: include progress against named goals + risk assessment

This skill optimizes for **the reader's time, not yours**. A status report is read in 60 seconds or skipped.

## The Weekly Template

```markdown
# <Your Name / Team Name> — Week of <YYYY-MM-DD>

## TL;DR
<2 sentences. What's the state of the world? Use plain English.>

## ✅ Shipped This Week
- <bullet — outcome, not activity. Link if relevant.>
- <bullet — outcome.>

## 🔄 In Flight
- <project> — <what stage, expected ship date>
- <project> — <what stage, expected ship date>

## ⚠️ Risks / Blockers
- <risk> — <impact + what's needed to unblock>

## 📊 Metrics (optional)
| Metric | This Week | Last Week | Δ |
|--------|-----------|-----------|---|
| <name> | <value> | <value> | <±> |

## 📅 Next Week
- <top 3 priorities, in order>
```

## Workflow

1. **Gather inputs** via `recall_memory` (if scope=session/project) and `ask_user_question`:
   - Date range covered (default: last 7 days)
   - Audience (manager? cross-functional? company all-hands?) — affects depth and jargon
   - Key projects to cover
   - Whether metrics are required and what the baseline is

2. **Categorize ruthlessly** — every bullet must fit exactly one bucket:
   - **Shipped** = merged / launched / delivered / decided. Past tense.
   - **In Flight** = work in progress, not yet shipped. Has an ETA.
   - **Risks/Blockers** = something that will hurt the plan if not addressed. Has a specific owner ask.

3. **Write outcomes, not activity**:
   - Bad: "Worked on auth migration. Had 3 design meetings."
   - Good: "Auth migration: design approved, infra ready. Cutover scheduled for May 5 (low risk)."

4. **Quantify when possible**:
   - "Shipped feature X" → "Shipped feature X (5% adoption in week 1, target was 3%)"
   - "Faster builds" → "CI builds dropped from 12m → 7m (median)"

5. **Sequence priorities by impact** — the first item in "Next Week" should be the highest-leverage thing. Don't bury it.

6. **Save state** — offer to save the report to memory or to compose an email via `email-draft`:
   ```
   Save this status to memory for next week's diff?
   Send to <manager> as an email?
   ```

## Style Rules

- **TL;DR is mandatory** — readers should know whether to read further in 5 seconds
- **Bullets, not paragraphs** — long sentences are a sign of unclear thinking
- **One bullet = one item** — don't smuggle 3 things into "and also"
- **Past tense for shipped, present for in flight, conditional for risks**
- **Drop hedge words** — "I think we kind of made progress on …" → "We shipped …" or "We're 70% done with …"
- **No vanity metrics** — if it's going up regardless of your effort, it's not your metric
- **Acknowledge what didn't ship** — silence on planned-but-undelivered items damages trust more than honesty

## Cadence-Specific Adjustments

### Daily / Standup (≤3 bullets)
```markdown
- Yesterday: <one outcome>
- Today: <one focus>
- Blockers: <none / specific ask>
```

### Monthly (add to weekly template)
```markdown
## 🎯 Themes
- <pattern across the 4 weeks: what got better, what's recurring>

## 📈 Trends
| Metric | Month-over-Month | Notes |
|--------|------------------|-------|
| ... | ... | ... |

## 🔭 Looking Ahead (next month)
- <strategic priorities, not tactical tasks>
```

### Quarterly / OKR (replace template)
```markdown
# Q<N> Review — <Team>

## Goals Status
| OKR | Target | Actual | Status | Confidence |
|-----|--------|--------|--------|------------|
| <name> | <metric> | <metric> | <On Track / At Risk / Off Track> | <0.0–1.0> |

## What Went Well
- <pattern, not single incident>

## What Didn't
- <honest pattern, with the lesson>

## Q<N+1> Bets
- <top 3 priorities for next quarter, with rationale>
```

## Audience-Specific Adjustments

| Audience | Adjust |
|----------|--------|
| Direct manager | Include risks honestly; manager wants to help unblock |
| Cross-functional team | More context; less internal jargon |
| Company all-hands | Outcomes only; cut planning details |
| Skip-level / exec | TL;DR + 3 bullets total; skip metrics unless they're 1-2 headline numbers |
| External (board, investors) | Headline outcomes + roadmap; never blockers without solutions |

## Common Pitfalls

| Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|
| Listing every Jira ticket | Group into ≤5 outcomes, name them |
| "Working on …" everywhere | Pick a stage: design / implementation / review / shipped |
| Burying bad news | Lead with "TL;DR: <project> slipping by 1 week, here's why" |
| Vague metrics ("better", "faster") | Specific numbers or skip the metric |
| Same priorities every week | Either reframe progress or admit it's stuck |
| No "next week" section | Always have one — shows you're proactive, not just reactive |
| Word-soup TL;DR | Two sentences max. If you can't compress, you don't understand the state. |

## Example

Input: "Write my weekly update — I shipped the auth refactor PR, I'm finishing the dashboard search feature, the embedding migration is blocked on infra, and I want to start the i18n rewrite next week."

Output:
```markdown
# Alice — Week of 2026-04-25

## TL;DR
Shipped auth refactor; dashboard search done by Friday. Embedding migration blocked on infra capacity (need decision by Tuesday).

## ✅ Shipped This Week
- Auth refactor PR merged (#1234) — removes legacy session middleware, paves way for OAuth migration.

## 🔄 In Flight
- Dashboard search — backend + UI complete, integration tests pending. Ship target: Friday.

## ⚠️ Risks / Blockers
- Embedding migration — blocked waiting on infra team's capacity decision. **Need by Tuesday** or May ship date slips.

## 📅 Nex
code-reviewSkill

>

email-draftSkill

Use when the user asks to draft, polish, translate, or reply to an email. Produces a clean draft with subject line, greeting, body, and sign-off, plus a pre-send self-check.

feishuSkill

Use when the user mentions 飞书 / Feishu / Lark workspace operations: docx (云文档) read/write, bitable (多维表格) records / views / dashboards, drive (云盘) upload/download, wiki (知识库) link resolution, approval (审批) instance create/cancel/query, calendar (日历) event create/list/update + attendees, contact (联系人) user/department lookup, hire (招聘) job/talent/application listing. Trigger on phrases like 'OKR 周报', '把这份文档发到飞书云盘', '给团队拉个评审会议', '查 [姓名] 的联系方式', '撤销那条审批', '/wiki 链接', or any request that mentions a feishu / lark URL / token (doxcn.../bascn.../wikcn.../boxcn.../om_...).

ha-browserSkill

Hope Agent browser automation — the standard `status → tabs → snapshot → act` loop, stale-ref recovery rules, and what to do when login / 2FA / captcha / camera-prompt / dialog blocks progress. Load this skill whenever you reach for the `browser` tool. Trigger on: user asks the agent to open / control / click / scrape / log into / verify something in a web app ('open X and click Y', '打开 X 然后点击 Y', 'log into my Gmail', 'scrape this page', 'fill out the form on X'); user reports a flow that requires real browser context (cookies, JS-rendered content, OAuth).

ha-code-reviewSkill

Hope-native review of uncommitted, staged, commit, branch, or PR changes: discover concrete regressions, independently verify candidates, and report actionable findings first without speculative noise.

ha-coding-commonSkill

Hope-native baseline for implementing, fixing, refactoring, and maintaining code: inspect the repository first, protect user changes, keep scope narrow, and finish with direct evidence.

ha-coding-planSkill

Hope-native implementation planning for non-trivial code changes: ground the plan in repository evidence, order dependencies, name critical files and risks, define verification, then continue execution when allowed.

ha-data-analyticsSkill

Hope-native local-first data analysis and Artifact reporting. Use for CSV/XLSX analysis, KPI readouts, metric diagnosis, product/business analysis, data-quality review, dashboards, charts, analytical reports, 数据分析, 指标诊断, 数据质量, 分析报告, or when the user wants a shareable offline HTML/ZIP/Markdown/PDF result. Produces the versioned AnalysisArtifactV1 contract and registers it with the artifact tool; never guesses missing data or requires public web deployment.