Skip to main content
ClaudeWave
Skill2.3k repo starsupdated 1mo ago

offensive-z-wave

This Claude Code skill provides techniques for attacking Z-Wave smart home networks across both legacy S0 and modern S2 security schemes. It covers hardware setup (EZ-Wave, RTL-SDR, HackRF), network sniffing during device commissioning, exploitation of S0's fixed-PSK derivation flaw, S2 implementation weaknesses, and replay attacks on unauthenticated nodes. Use when assessing Z-Wave-based home automation deployments, particularly mid-2010s installations still running vulnerable S0 security.

Install in Claude Code
Copy
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SnailSploit/Claude-Red /tmp/offensive-z-wave && cp -r /tmp/offensive-z-wave/Skills/wireless/offensive-z-wave ~/.claude/skills/offensive-z-wave
Then start a new Claude Code session; the skill loads automatically.

SKILL.md

# Z-Wave Attacks

Z-Wave runs in the 800/900 MHz ISM band (US: 908 MHz, EU: 868 MHz). Older networks used the S0 security scheme with a fixed-derivation network key — long-known to be flawed. S2 (mandatory for Z-Wave Plus v2 since 2017) uses ECDH commissioning and is significantly stronger.

## Quick Workflow

1. Identify region (US 908 MHz / EU 868 MHz) — adapter frequency must match
2. Sniff inclusion (commissioning) traffic — that's where keys are exchanged
3. Determine S0 vs S2 from frame format
4. For S0: derive/replay; for S2: analyze ECDH and look for implementation flaws

---

## Hardware

| Adapter | Use |
|---|---|
| Z-Force (legacy, hard to find) | Original research tool |
| EZ-Wave (custom HackRF firmware) | Modern, full transceiver |
| Aeotec Z-Stick | Commercial controller, useful as legitimate node |
| HackRF + open Z-Wave firmware | Multi-band SDR approach |
| RTL-SDR + ZniffMobile (passive only) | Cheap sniffer |

## Sniffing

```bash
# EZ-Wave (HackRF firmware-based)
git clone https://github.com/cureHsu/EZ-Wave
ezwave-sniff -f 908.4MHz -o capture.pcap

# Wireshark with the Z-Wave dissector parses captured frames
wireshark capture.pcap
```

Look for the inclusion phase (controller adding new device) — that's where the network key is exchanged.

## S0 Security Flaw

S0 derives the network key from a fixed all-zero PSK during the inclusion of the first device. That fixed material is well-known — any S0 network you sniff during inclusion can be decrypted offline.

```
S0 commissioning:
  1. New node joins → controller sends key with zero-PSK encryption
  2. Attacker sniffs commissioning frame → derives session key
  3. All future S0 traffic on that network is decryptable
```

If you can:
- Trigger inclusion (factory-reset a node, or wait for legitimate inclusion)
- Sniff during the ~2-second key-exchange window

You own the network key for that mesh.

## S2 (Z-Wave Plus / S2 Authenticated)

S2 fixes S0 by using ECDH for commissioning:
- Each device has a Curve25519 keypair
- Inclusion uses DSK (Device Specific Key) verified out-of-band (sticker/QR)
- Network key never traverses the air in plaintext

S2 attack surface is mostly implementation:
- Inclusion-mode-always-open (controller misconfig)
- Firmware bugs in S2 verification
- Side-channel on ECDH on resource-constrained chips
- DSK printed on a sticker → physical access yields it

## Replay / Injection on Unauthenticated Nodes

Many low-end Z-Wave devices (older sensors, basic switches) don't enforce S0 or S2 — they accept commands in cleartext.

```python
# scapy-zwave (community fork) for crafted frames
from scapy.contrib.zwave import *
frame = ZWave(home_id=0x12345678)/ZWaveBasic(set_value=0xff)
sendp(frame, iface='ezwave0')
```

This unlocks doors / switches lights / unarms sensors when the target lacks authentication.

## Key Brute-Force

For old test deployments using default home IDs / network keys:

```bash
# Try default home IDs
for hid in 0x00000000 0x12345678 ...; do
  ezwave-test --home-id $hid --target-node 1
done
```

Hit rate on production is low; useful only for default-config IoT lab gear.

## Hub Pivots

Z-Wave devices are typically controlled by a hub (SmartThings, Hubitat, Vera, Home Assistant, Z-Wave JS UI). The hub is a Linux device with the Z-Wave PSK in plaintext storage:

- SmartThings Hub: previously cloud-only credentials; modern v3 stores network key locally
- Home Assistant: `~/.homeassistant/zwave_js.json` typically contains keys
- Hubitat: web UI with default password on older versions

Compromise the hub → walk away with the Z-Wave PSK + every paired device's command authority. See `offensive-iot` for hub firmware extraction.

## Engagement Cheatsheet

```bash
# 1. Identify region + frequency
# US: 908.4 MHz; EU: 868.4 MHz; CN: 868.4 MHz

# 2. Sniff
ezwave-sniff -f 908.4MHz -o cap.pcap
wireshark cap.pcap   # filter zwave

# 3. Identify S0 vs S2 from frame format

# 4. For S0: capture inclusion → derive key → decrypt history + control devices

# 5. For S2: focus on hub compromise / DSK theft / implementation bugs

# 6. Test unauthenticated cleartext devices with crafted frames
```

## Detection

- Most Z-Wave deployments have no IDS comparable to Wi-Fi/Zigbee monitoring
- Hub may log unexpected commands but UI rarely surfaces these to users
- Inclusion-mode-open is visible in hub UI but ignored by inattentive admins

## Reporting

- Identify chipset / firmware revision per device (ZW0500 series, ZW7000 series)
- Map S0 vs S2 per node — note any S0 left on a network with S2-capable nodes
- Document hub compromise paths separately

---

## Key References

- EZ-Wave: github.com/cureHsu/EZ-Wave (HackRF-based)
- "Z-Force and the Z-Wave Sniffer" — original research
- Silicon Labs Z-Wave 700-series spec
- Source: https://github.com/SnailSploit/offensive-checklist/blob/main/wireless.md
offensive-active-directorySkill

Active Directory attack methodology for internal network red team engagements. Covers reconnaissance (BloodHound, PowerView, ADExplorer), credential abuse (Kerberoasting, ASREProasting, NTLM relay, LLMNR/NBT-NS poisoning), privilege escalation (ACL abuse, GPO abuse, unconstrained/constrained delegation), lateral movement (Pass-the-Hash, Pass-the-Ticket, Overpass-the-Hash, WMI/WinRM/PsExec), persistence (Golden/Silver/Diamond Tickets, DCSync, DCShadow, AdminSDHolder, Skeleton Key), forest trust attacks, ADCS abuse (ESC1-ESC15), and modern MDI/Defender for Identity evasion. Use when assessing on-prem AD, hybrid AD/Entra ID environments, or ADCS deployments.

offensive-ai-securitySkill
offensive-jwtSkill

JWT attack methodology for penetration testers. Covers algorithm confusion (alg:none, RS256→HS256), weak HMAC secret brute force, kid parameter injection (SQLi, path traversal), jku/x5u/jwk header injection, JWKS cache poisoning, JWS/JWE confusion, timing attacks, and mobile JWT storage extraction. Use when testing JWT-based authentication, hunting auth bypass via token manipulation, or evaluating JWT implementation security in web or mobile apps.

offensive-oauthSkill
offensive-cloudSkill

Cloud security attack methodology covering AWS, Azure, and GCP. Includes credential harvesting (IMDS, ~/.aws, env vars, leaked CI secrets, instance roles), enumeration with cloud-specific tools (pacu, ScoutSuite, Prowler, ROADtools, gcp_enum), privilege escalation paths (IAM PassRole, AssumeRole chains, Lambda/Functions privilege flips, Azure Owner-on-self, GCP serviceAccountTokenCreator), persistence techniques (IAM user/key creation, AAD app registration, GCP svc account key creation, EventBridge/Logic Apps backdoors), data exfiltration (S3/Blob/GCS, snapshot share, RDS/CosmosDB/Cloud SQL exfil), cloud-native lateral movement (cross-account assume, Azure AD multi-tenant, GCP project hierarchy), serverless attacks (Lambda env vars, layer hijack, Step Functions), Kubernetes-on-cloud (EKS/AKS/GKE-specific paths to node and AWS metadata), and CSPM evasion (CloudTrail blind spots, GuardDuty mute, Sentinel rule shaping). Use when the engagement scope is cloud accounts, when you've stolen cloud credentials, or when assessing cloud posture.

offensive-basic-exploitationSkill
offensive-crash-analysisSkill
offensive-exploit-dev-courseSkill