Skip to main content
ClaudeWave
Skill300 repo starsupdated yesterday

postgresql-code-review

This PostgreSQL code review skill evaluates database code against PostgreSQL-specific standards including JSONB operations, array usage, schema design, custom types, function optimization, and security features like Row Level Security. Use it when reviewing PostgreSQL queries, schemas, or functions to identify anti-patterns, improve indexing strategies, and leverage PostgreSQL's unique capabilities for better performance and maintainability.

Install in Claude Code
Copy
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/syahiidkamil/Software-Engineer-AI-Agent-Atlas /tmp/postgresql-code-review && cp -r /tmp/postgresql-code-review/.claude/skills/postgresql-code-review ~/.claude/skills/postgresql-code-review
Then start a new Claude Code session; the skill loads automatically.

SKILL.md

# PostgreSQL Code Review Assistant

Expert PostgreSQL code review for ${selection} (or entire project if no selection). Focus on PostgreSQL-specific best practices, anti-patterns, and quality standards that are unique to PostgreSQL.

## 🎯 PostgreSQL-Specific Review Areas

### JSONB Best Practices
```sql
-- ❌ BAD: Inefficient JSONB usage
SELECT * FROM orders WHERE data->>'status' = 'shipped';  -- No index support

-- ✅ GOOD: Indexable JSONB queries
CREATE INDEX idx_orders_status ON orders USING gin((data->'status'));
SELECT * FROM orders WHERE data @> '{"status": "shipped"}';

-- ❌ BAD: Deep nesting without consideration
UPDATE orders SET data = data || '{"shipping":{"tracking":{"number":"123"}}}';

-- ✅ GOOD: Structured JSONB with validation
ALTER TABLE orders ADD CONSTRAINT valid_status 
CHECK (data->>'status' IN ('pending', 'shipped', 'delivered'));
```

### Array Operations Review
```sql
-- ❌ BAD: Inefficient array operations
SELECT * FROM products WHERE 'electronics' = ANY(categories);  -- No index

-- ✅ GOOD: GIN indexed array queries
CREATE INDEX idx_products_categories ON products USING gin(categories);
SELECT * FROM products WHERE categories @> ARRAY['electronics'];

-- ❌ BAD: Array concatenation in loops
-- This would be inefficient in a function/procedure

-- ✅ GOOD: Bulk array operations
UPDATE products SET categories = categories || ARRAY['new_category']
WHERE id IN (SELECT id FROM products WHERE condition);
```

### PostgreSQL Schema Design Review
```sql
-- ❌ BAD: Not using PostgreSQL features
CREATE TABLE users (
    id INTEGER,
    email VARCHAR(255),
    created_at TIMESTAMP
);

-- ✅ GOOD: PostgreSQL-optimized schema
CREATE TABLE users (
    id BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
    email CITEXT UNIQUE NOT NULL,  -- Case-insensitive email
    created_at TIMESTAMPTZ DEFAULT NOW(),
    metadata JSONB DEFAULT '{}',
    CONSTRAINT valid_email CHECK (email ~* '^[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}$')
);

-- Add JSONB GIN index for metadata queries
CREATE INDEX idx_users_metadata ON users USING gin(metadata);
```

### Custom Types and Domains
```sql
-- ❌ BAD: Using generic types for specific data
CREATE TABLE transactions (
    amount DECIMAL(10,2),
    currency VARCHAR(3),
    status VARCHAR(20)
);

-- ✅ GOOD: PostgreSQL custom types
CREATE TYPE currency_code AS ENUM ('USD', 'EUR', 'GBP', 'JPY');
CREATE TYPE transaction_status AS ENUM ('pending', 'completed', 'failed', 'cancelled');
CREATE DOMAIN positive_amount AS DECIMAL(10,2) CHECK (VALUE > 0);

CREATE TABLE transactions (
    amount positive_amount NOT NULL,
    currency currency_code NOT NULL,
    status transaction_status DEFAULT 'pending'
);
```

## 🔍 PostgreSQL-Specific Anti-Patterns

### Performance Anti-Patterns
- **Avoiding PostgreSQL-specific indexes**: Not using GIN/GiST for appropriate data types
- **Misusing JSONB**: Treating JSONB like a simple string field
- **Ignoring array operators**: Using inefficient array operations
- **Poor partition key selection**: Not leveraging PostgreSQL partitioning effectively

### Schema Design Issues
- **Not using ENUM types**: Using VARCHAR for limited value sets
- **Ignoring constraints**: Missing CHECK constraints for data validation
- **Wrong data types**: Using VARCHAR instead of TEXT or CITEXT
- **Missing JSONB structure**: Unstructured JSONB without validation

### Function and Trigger Issues
```sql
-- ❌ BAD: Inefficient trigger function
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION update_modified_time()
RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$
BEGIN
    NEW.updated_at = NOW();  -- Should use TIMESTAMPTZ
    RETURN NEW;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;

-- ✅ GOOD: Optimized trigger function
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION update_modified_time()
RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$
BEGIN
    NEW.updated_at = CURRENT_TIMESTAMP;
    RETURN NEW;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;

-- Set trigger to fire only when needed
CREATE TRIGGER update_modified_time_trigger
    BEFORE UPDATE ON table_name
    FOR EACH ROW
    WHEN (OLD.* IS DISTINCT FROM NEW.*)
    EXECUTE FUNCTION update_modified_time();
```

## 📊 PostgreSQL Extension Usage Review

### Extension Best Practices
```sql
-- ✅ Check if extension exists before creating
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS "uuid-ossp";
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS "pgcrypto";
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS "pg_trgm";

-- ✅ Use extensions appropriately
-- UUID generation
SELECT uuid_generate_v4();

-- Password hashing
SELECT crypt('password', gen_salt('bf'));

-- Fuzzy text matching
SELECT word_similarity('postgres', 'postgre');
```

## 🛡️ PostgreSQL Security Review

### Row Level Security (RLS)
```sql
-- ✅ GOOD: Implementing RLS
ALTER TABLE sensitive_data ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;

CREATE POLICY user_data_policy ON sensitive_data
    FOR ALL TO application_role
    USING (user_id = current_setting('app.current_user_id')::INTEGER);
```

### Privilege Management
```sql
-- ❌ BAD: Overly broad permissions
GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO app_user;

-- ✅ GOOD: Granular permissions
GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE ON specific_table TO app_user;
GRANT USAGE ON SEQUENCE specific_table_id_seq TO app_user;
```

## 🎯 PostgreSQL Code Quality Checklist

### Schema Design
- [ ] Using appropriate PostgreSQL data types (CITEXT, JSONB, arrays)
- [ ] Leveraging ENUM types for constrained values
- [ ] Implementing proper CHECK constraints
- [ ] Using TIMESTAMPTZ instead of TIMESTAMP
- [ ] Defining custom domains for reusable constraints

### Performance Considerations
- [ ] Appropriate index types (GIN for JSONB/arrays, GiST for ranges)
- [ ] JSONB queries using containment operators (@>, ?)
- [ ] Array operations using PostgreSQL-specific operators
- [ ] Proper use of window functions and CTEs
- [ ] Efficient use of PostgreSQL-specific functions

### PostgreSQL Features Utilization
- [ ] Using extensions where appropriate
- [ ] Implementing stored procedures in PL/pgSQL when beneficial
- [ ] Leveraging PostgreSQL's advanced SQL features
- [ ] Using PostgreSQL-specific optimization techniques
- [ ] Implementing p
code-architectSubagent

Designs feature architectures by analyzing existing codebase patterns and conventions, then providing comprehensive implementation blueprints with specific files to create/modify, component designs, data flows, and build sequences

code-explorerSubagent

Deeply analyzes existing codebase features by tracing execution paths, mapping architecture layers, understanding patterns and abstractions, and documenting dependencies to inform new development

code-reviewSubagent

Code review a pull request

code-simplifierSubagent

Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Focuses on recently modified code unless instructed otherwise.

commitSlash Command

Commit what is already staged — runs the commit subagent in the background, following the ATLAS commit convention.

qa-manual-testerSubagent

Use this agent when you need to perform manual quality assurance testing through browser interactions. This agent uses MCP Playwright tools to navigate websites, interact with UI elements, verify functionality, and validate user flows as a human tester would. Perfect for testing new features, regression testing, validating bug fixes, or exploring application behavior. Examples:\n\n<example>\nContext: The user has just implemented a new login feature and wants to test it.\nuser: "I've added a new login form, can you test if it works correctly?"\nassistant: "I'll use the qa-manual-tester agent to test the login functionality through the browser."\n<commentary>\nSince the user needs manual testing of a new feature, use the Task tool to launch the qa-manual-tester agent to interact with the browser and verify the login flow.\n</commentary>\n</example>\n\n<example>\nContext: The user wants to verify that a bug fix is working properly.\nuser: "I fixed the issue where the submit button wasn't working on mobile view. Can you verify?"\nassistant: "Let me launch the qa-manual-tester agent to verify the submit button works correctly in mobile view."\n<commentary>\nThe user needs manual verification of a bug fix, so use the qa-manual-tester agent to test the specific functionality through browser interaction.\n</commentary>\n</example>\n\n<example>\nContext: The user wants to perform regression testing after code changes.\nuser: "I've refactored the checkout flow. Please test that everything still works."\nassistant: "I'll use the qa-manual-tester agent to perform comprehensive testing of the checkout flow."\n<commentary>\nSince the user needs regression testing after refactoring, use the qa-manual-tester agent to manually test the entire checkout flow.\n</commentary>\n</example>

change-core-selfSlash Command

Interview Boss about the project, then reason from first principles to design the ideal ATLAS operating identity/system-prompt for it — free to drop KISS/YAGNI/DRY/clean-architecture entirely when the project (and the LLM's own distribution) calls for a different mindset

get-to-knowSlash Command

Initialize project context — understand the project, configure conventions, and set up project rules