git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/testdouble/han /tmp/plan-a-feature-to-confluence && cp -r /tmp/plan-a-feature-to-confluence/han.atlassian/skills/plan-a-feature-to-confluence ~/.claude/skills/plan-a-feature-to-confluenceSKILL.md
# Plan a Feature to Confluence This skill builds a feature specification with the core `han.planning:plan-a-feature` skill, lets the user review the result, and then publishes it to a Confluence location that **the user must specify**. It is a thin orchestrator: the planning work belongs to `han.planning:plan-a-feature`, and the publishing work belongs to `han.atlassian:markdown-to-confluence`. This skill only validates its inputs, runs the planning skill to a temporary folder, gets the user's review and publish choice, and hands each file to the publisher. `han.planning:plan-a-feature` produces a small **set** of files — the primary `feature-specification.md` plus companion artifacts under `artifacts/` (the decision log, the team findings, and a lazily-created technical-notes file). This skill publishes the **spec as a parent page** and each companion artifact as a **child page** beneath it, so the whole plan lands in Confluence as one small page tree. The files cross-reference each other with relative links that do not resolve once each file is its own Confluence page. Because this skill decides every page's title up front, it rewrites those cross-file links into Confluence **title-based page-link macros** (the `<ac:link><ri:page ri:content-title="..."/>…</ac:link>` form; Step 5 gives the exact macro to emit, link body and all) before creating any page — these resolve by title at view time, so no page URL or ID has to exist first. That collapses publishing to a **single create pass**: there is no separate relink-and-update pass, and each page is created exactly once. The six steps below are the whole skill. It does not resolve Confluence pages or call the Confluence MCP create/update tools itself; `han.atlassian:markdown-to-confluence` owns all of that. ## Step 1: Validate Inputs Confirm the skill has everything it needs before spending effort producing a plan: 1. **Atlassian MCP reachable (hard requirement).** Call `mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__getAccessibleAtlassianResources` to confirm the server is connected and retrieve the cloud ID(s). If the tool is not available, the call errors, or it returns no accessible resources (typically an authentication or configuration problem), **stop immediately**. Tell the user this skill requires the Atlassian MCP server to be installed, configured, and authenticated, and that they can re-run it once it is connected. Do not fall back to a local-only run; for local-only planning, point them at `han.planning:plan-a-feature`. This preflight runs first so a missing server fails before any planning work begins. 2. **A feature to plan.** Confirm the request names a feature, capability, or system behavior to specify. This — together with the `size` argument and any relevant conversation context — is forwarded to `han.planning:plan-a-feature` verbatim in Step 2. If the request is too thin to start, let `han.planning:plan-a-feature` run its own interview; do not pre-empt it here. 3. **A Confluence destination.** Confirm the request provides a target location: a **Confluence page URL** (to update that page, or create the spec as a child under it), or a **space** (key or name) plus an optional **parent page**. If none was provided, ask for one with `AskUserQuestion`, explaining plainly that the skill needs an exact destination because it does not search Confluence. Do not resolve the page tree here — only confirm a location was given. Carry it through to Step 5; `han.atlassian:markdown-to-confluence` resolves it. ## Step 2: Produce the Plan to a Temporary Folder Invoke the `han.planning:plan-a-feature` skill with the **Skill** tool, **forwarding all provided context** verbatim: the `size` argument (if the user passed `small`, `medium`, or `large`), the feature description, any known constraints or entry points, and the relevant conversation context. Do not summarize, trim, or reinterpret the user's context; pass it through so `han.planning:plan-a-feature` runs exactly as it would on its own — interview, review team, finding resolution, and project-manager synthesis included — **except** add one explicit instruction: it must write its output folder under `/tmp/` (for example `/tmp/<feature-slug>/`) rather than into the repo's docs directory, and it should not prompt the user to choose or confirm an output location, because this skill owns that decision. This keeps the working plan out of the repo until the user decides to publish it. Let `han.planning:plan-a-feature` complete its full process. **Capture the exact `/tmp/` paths of every file it wrote:** - `/tmp/<feature-slug>/feature-specification.md` — the primary spec (always written). - `/tmp/<feature-slug>/artifacts/decision-log.md` — the decision history (always written). - `/tmp/<feature-slug>/artifacts/team-findings.md` — the review-team findings (always written). - `/tmp/<feature-slug>/artifacts/feature-technical-notes.md` — load-bearing mechanics. **Lazily created — only present if at least one technical note qualified.** Confirm whether it exists before relying on it. Proceed to Step 3 once it finishes. ## Step 3: Show the Files for Review Tell the user the exact `/tmp/` paths of every generated file — the spec and each companion artifact that was actually written (the technical-notes file only if it exists) — so they can open and review them before deciding whether to publish. State plainly that nothing has been published anywhere yet. ## Step 4: Confirm the Publish Choice Publishing to Confluence puts the content where other people can see it, so require an explicit choice before posting. Ask with `AskUserQuestion`, restating the **`/tmp/` file paths** and the **Confluence destination** the user provided, and making clear that publishing creates **one parent page (the spec) plus one child page per companion artifact**, and that the cross-page links between them resolve **by page title** — so the published pages should not be rena
>
>
>
>
>
Performs deep architectural analysis of a specified module, directory, or feature area by examining structural coupling, data flow, concurrency patterns, risk, and SOLID alignment. Use when the user wants to assess, evaluate, or review the architecture, design quality, dependency structure, coupling, cohesion, or technical debt of an existing part of the codebase. Not for investigating specific bugs, runtime errors, or failures — use investigate. Not for test planning — use test-planning. Not for file-level code review — use code-review. Not for researching open-ended options, prior art, or how something works — use research. Not for writing documentation or architectural decision records.
Run a comprehensive code review on local source files. Use this skill when the user asks to review, audit, inspect, evaluate, or check code, even if they never use the word \"review.\" Does not post comments to GitHub pull requests — use post-code-review-to-pr for that. Does not analyze architectural structure or module boundaries — use architectural-analysis for that. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.
>