Skip to main content
ClaudeWave
Skill5.7k repo starsupdated yesterday

harness-writing

# harness-writing This Claude Code skill teaches how to write effective fuzzing harnesses that serve as the entry point between a fuzzer's random input and the system under test. Use this skill when creating new fuzz targets, improving code coverage in existing campaigns, debugging non-reproducible crashes, or testing APIs that require structured inputs, covering essential concepts like FuzzedDataProvider, determinism, and practical patterns for C++ and Rust harnesses.

Install in Claude Code
Copy
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/trailofbits/skills /tmp/harness-writing && cp -r /tmp/harness-writing/plugins/testing-handbook-skills/skills/harness-writing ~/.claude/skills/harness-writing
Then start a new Claude Code session; the skill loads automatically.

SKILL.md

# Writing Fuzzing Harnesses

A fuzzing harness is the entrypoint function that receives random data from the fuzzer and routes it to your system under test (SUT). The quality of your harness directly determines which code paths get exercised and whether critical bugs are found. A poorly written harness can miss entire subsystems or produce non-reproducible crashes.

## Overview

The harness is the bridge between the fuzzer's random byte generation and your application's API. It must parse raw bytes into meaningful inputs, call target functions, and handle edge cases gracefully. The most important part of any fuzzing setup is the harness—if written poorly, critical parts of your application may not be covered.

### Key Concepts

| Concept | Description |
|---------|-------------|
| **Harness** | Function that receives fuzzer input and calls target code under test |
| **SUT** | System Under Test—the code being fuzzed |
| **Entry point** | Function signature required by the fuzzer (e.g., `LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput`) |
| **FuzzedDataProvider** | Helper class for structured extraction of typed data from raw bytes |
| **Determinism** | Property that ensures same input always produces same behavior |
| **Interleaved fuzzing** | Single harness that exercises multiple operations based on input |

## When to Apply

**Apply this technique when:**
- Creating a new fuzz target for the first time
- Fuzz campaign has low code coverage or isn't finding bugs
- Crashes found during fuzzing are not reproducible
- Target API requires complex or structured inputs
- Multiple related functions should be tested together

**Skip this technique when:**
- Using existing well-tested harnesses from your project
- Tool provides automatic harness generation that meets your needs
- Target already has comprehensive fuzzing infrastructure

## Quick Reference

| Task | Pattern |
|------|---------|
| Minimal C++ harness | `extern "C" int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t* data, size_t size)` |
| Minimal Rust harness | `fuzz_target!(|data: &[u8]| { ... })` |
| Size validation | `if (size < MIN_SIZE) return 0;` |
| Cast to integers | `uint32_t val = *(uint32_t*)(data);` |
| Use FuzzedDataProvider | `FuzzedDataProvider fuzzed_data(data, size);` |
| Extract typed data (C++) | `auto val = fuzzed_data.ConsumeIntegral<uint32_t>();` |
| Extract string (C++) | `auto str = fuzzed_data.ConsumeBytesWithTerminator<char>(32, 0xFF);` |

## Step-by-Step

### Step 1: Identify Entry Points

Find functions in your codebase that:
- Accept external input (parsers, validators, protocol handlers)
- Parse complex data formats (JSON, XML, binary protocols)
- Perform security-critical operations (authentication, cryptography)
- Have high cyclomatic complexity or many branches

Good targets are typically:
- Protocol parsers
- File format parsers
- Serialization/deserialization functions
- Input validation routines

### Step 2: Write Minimal Harness

Start with the simplest possible harness that calls your target function:

**C/C++:**
```cpp
extern "C" int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
    target_function(data, size);
    return 0;
}
```

**Rust:**
```rust
#![no_main]
use libfuzzer_sys::fuzz_target;

fuzz_target!(|data: &[u8]| {
    target_function(data);
});
```

### Step 3: Add Input Validation

Reject inputs that are too small or too large to be meaningful:

```cpp
extern "C" int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
    // Ensure minimum size for meaningful input
    if (size < MIN_INPUT_SIZE || size > MAX_INPUT_SIZE) {
        return 0;
    }
    target_function(data, size);
    return 0;
}
```

**Rationale:** The fuzzer generates random inputs of all sizes. Your harness must handle empty, tiny, huge, or malformed inputs without causing unexpected issues in the harness itself (crashes in the SUT are fine—that's what we're looking for).

### Step 4: Structure the Input

For APIs that require typed data (integers, strings, etc.), use casting or helpers like `FuzzedDataProvider`:

**Simple casting:**
```cpp
extern "C" int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
    if (size != 2 * sizeof(uint32_t)) {
        return 0;
    }

    uint32_t numerator = *(uint32_t*)(data);
    uint32_t denominator = *(uint32_t*)(data + sizeof(uint32_t));

    divide(numerator, denominator);
    return 0;
}
```

**Using FuzzedDataProvider:**
```cpp
#include "FuzzedDataProvider.h"

extern "C" int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
    FuzzedDataProvider fuzzed_data(data, size);

    size_t allocation_size = fuzzed_data.ConsumeIntegral<size_t>();
    std::vector<char> str1 = fuzzed_data.ConsumeBytesWithTerminator<char>(32, 0xFF);
    std::vector<char> str2 = fuzzed_data.ConsumeBytesWithTerminator<char>(32, 0xFF);

    concat(&str1[0], str1.size(), &str2[0], str2.size(), allocation_size);
    return 0;
}
```

### Step 5: Test and Iterate

Run the fuzzer and monitor:
- Code coverage (are all interesting paths reached?)
- Executions per second (is it fast enough?)
- Crash reproducibility (can you reproduce crashes with saved inputs?)

Iterate on the harness to improve these metrics.

## Common Patterns

### Pattern: Beyond Byte Arrays—Casting to Integers

**Use Case:** When target expects primitive types like integers or floats

**Implementation:**
```cpp
extern "C" int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
    // Ensure exactly 2 4-byte numbers
    if (size != 2 * sizeof(uint32_t)) {
        return 0;
    }

    // Split input into two integers
    uint32_t numerator = *(uint32_t*)(data);
    uint32_t denominator = *(uint32_t*)(data + sizeof(uint32_t));

    divide(numerator, denominator);
    return 0;
}
```

**Rust equivalent:**
```rust
fuzz_target!(|data: &[u8]| {
    if data.len() != 2 * std::mem::size_of::<i32>() {
        return;
    }

    let numerator = i32::from_ne_bytes([data[0], data[1], data[2], data[3]]);
    let denominator = i32::from_ne_bytes([
agentic-actions-auditorSkill

Audits GitHub Actions workflows for security vulnerabilities in AI agent integrations including Claude Code Action, Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex, and GitHub AI Inference. Detects attack vectors where attacker-controlled input reaches AI agents running in CI/CD pipelines, including env var intermediary patterns, direct expression injection, dangerous sandbox configurations, and wildcard user allowlists. Use when reviewing workflow files that invoke AI coding agents, auditing CI/CD pipeline security for prompt injection risks, or evaluating agentic action configurations.

ask-questions-if-underspecifiedSkill

Clarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts arise.

audit-context-buildingSkill

Enables ultra-granular, line-by-line code analysis to build deep architectural context before vulnerability or bug finding.

algorand-vulnerability-scannerSkill

Scans Algorand smart contracts for 11 common vulnerabilities including rekeying attacks, unchecked transaction fees, missing field validations, and access control issues. Use when auditing Algorand projects (TEAL/PyTeal).

audit-prep-assistantSkill

Prepares codebases for security review using Trail of Bits' checklist. Helps set review goals, runs static analysis tools, increases test coverage, removes dead code, ensures accessibility, and generates documentation (flowcharts, user stories, inline comments).

cairo-vulnerability-scannerSkill

Scans Cairo/StarkNet smart contracts for 6 critical vulnerabilities including felt252 arithmetic overflow, L1-L2 messaging issues, address conversion problems, and signature replay. Use when auditing StarkNet projects.

code-maturity-assessorSkill

Systematic code maturity assessment using Trail of Bits' 9-category framework. Analyzes codebase for arithmetic safety, auditing practices, access controls, complexity, decentralization, documentation, MEV risks, low-level code, and testing. Produces professional scorecard with evidence-based ratings and actionable recommendations.

cosmos-vulnerability-scannerSkill

Scans Cosmos SDK blockchain modules and CosmWasm contracts for consensus-critical vulnerabilities — chain halts, fund loss, state divergence. 25 core + 16 IBC + 10 EVM + 3 CosmWasm patterns. Use when auditing custom x/ modules, reviewing IBC integrations, or assessing pre-launch chain security. Updated for SDK v0.53.x.