codeql
Run CodeQL database creation and security queries, add data-extension models, or process CodeQL SARIF. Use when CodeQL is explicitly requested; use security-review for a broader manual security review.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/waybarrios/opencode-power-pack /tmp/codeql && cp -r /tmp/codeql/skills/codeql ~/.claude/skills/codeqlSKILL.md
# CodeQL Analysis
Supported languages: Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Java/Kotlin, C/C++, C#, Ruby, Swift.
**Skill resources:** Reference files and templates are located at `references/` and `workflows/`.
## Essential Principles
1. **Database quality is non-negotiable.** A database that builds is not automatically good. Always run quality assessment (file counts, baseline LoC, extractor errors) and compare against expected source files. A cached build produces zero useful extraction.
2. **Data extensions catch what CodeQL misses.** Even projects using standard frameworks (Django, Spring, Express) have custom wrappers around database calls, request parsing, or shell execution. Skipping the create-data-extensions workflow means missing vulnerabilities in project-specific code paths.
3. **Explicit suite references prevent silent query dropping.** Never pass pack names directly to `codeql database analyze` — each pack's `defaultSuiteFile` applies hidden filters that can produce zero results. Always generate a custom `.qls` suite file.
4. **Zero findings needs investigation, not celebration.** Zero results can indicate poor database quality, missing models, wrong query packs, or silent suite filtering. Investigate before reporting clean.
5. **macOS Apple Silicon requires workarounds for compiled languages.** Exit code 137 is `arm64e`/`arm64` mismatch, not a build failure. Try Homebrew arm64 tools or Rosetta before falling back to `build-mode=none`.
6. **Follow workflows step by step.** Once a workflow is selected, execute it step by step without skipping phases. Each phase gates the next — skipping quality assessment or data extensions leads to incomplete analysis.
## Output Directory
All generated files (database, build logs, diagnostics, extensions, results) are stored in a single output directory.
- **If the user specifies an output directory** in their prompt, use it as `OUTPUT_DIR`.
- **If not specified**, default to `./static_analysis_codeql_1`. If that already exists, increment to `_2`, `_3`, etc.
In both cases, **always create the directory** with `mkdir -p` before writing any files.
```bash
# Resolve output directory
if [ -n "$USER_SPECIFIED_DIR" ]; then
OUTPUT_DIR="$USER_SPECIFIED_DIR"
else
BASE="static_analysis_codeql"
N=1
while [ -e "${BASE}_${N}" ]; do
N=$((N + 1))
done
OUTPUT_DIR="${BASE}_${N}"
fi
mkdir -p "$OUTPUT_DIR"
```
The output directory is resolved **once** at the start before any workflow executes. All workflows receive `$OUTPUT_DIR` and store their artifacts there:
```
$OUTPUT_DIR/
├── rulesets.txt # Selected query packs (logged after Step 3)
├── codeql.db/ # CodeQL database (dir containing codeql-database.yml)
├── build.log # Build log
├── codeql-config.yml # Exclusion config (interpreted languages)
├── diagnostics/ # Diagnostic queries and CSVs
├── extensions/ # Data extension YAMLs
├── raw/ # Unfiltered analysis output
│ ├── results.sarif
│ └── <mode>.qls
└── results/ # Final results (filtered for important-only, copied for run-all)
└── results.sarif
```
### Database Discovery
A CodeQL database is identified by the presence of a `codeql-database.yml` marker file inside its directory. When searching for existing databases, **always collect all matches** — there may be multiple databases from previous runs or for different languages.
**Discovery command:**
```bash
# Find ALL CodeQL databases (top-level and one subdirectory deep)
find . -maxdepth 3 -name "codeql-database.yml" -not -path "*/\.*" 2>/dev/null \
| while read -r yml; do dirname "$yml"; done
```
- **Inside `$OUTPUT_DIR`:** `find "$OUTPUT_DIR" -maxdepth 2 -name "codeql-database.yml"`
- **Project-wide (for auto-detection):** `find . -maxdepth 3 -name "codeql-database.yml"` — covers databases at the project top level (`./db-name/`) and one subdirectory deep (`./subdir/db-name/`). Does not search deeper.
Never assume a database is named `codeql.db` — discover it by its marker file.
**When multiple databases are found:**
For each discovered database, collect metadata to help the user choose:
```bash
# For each database, extract language and creation time
for db in $FOUND_DBS; do
CODEQL_LANG=$(codeql resolve database --format=json -- "$db" 2>/dev/null | jq -r '.languages[0]')
CREATED=$(grep '^creationMetadata:' -A5 "$db/codeql-database.yml" 2>/dev/null | grep 'creationTime' | awk '{print $2}')
echo "$db — language: $CODEQL_LANG, created: $CREATED"
done
```
Then use `AskUserQuestion` to let the user select which database to use, or to build a new one. **Skip `AskUserQuestion` if the user explicitly stated which database to use or to build a new one in their prompt.**
## Quick Start
For the common case ("scan this codebase for vulnerabilities"):
```bash
# 1. Verify CodeQL is installed
if ! command -v codeql >/dev/null 2>&1; then
echo "NOT INSTALLED: codeql binary not found on PATH"
else
codeql --version || echo "ERROR: codeql found but --version failed (check installation)"
fi
# 2. Resolve output directory
BASE="static_analysis_codeql"; N=1
while [ -e "${BASE}_${N}" ]; do N=$((N + 1)); done
OUTPUT_DIR="${BASE}_${N}"; mkdir -p "$OUTPUT_DIR"
```
Then execute the full pipeline: **build database → create data extensions → run analysis** using the workflows below.
## When to Use
- Scanning a codebase for security vulnerabilities with deep data flow analysis
- Building a CodeQL database from source code (with build capability for compiled languages)
- Finding complex vulnerabilities that require interprocedural taint tracking or AST/CFG analysis
- Performing comprehensive security audits with multiple query packs
## When NOT to Use
- **Writing custom queries** - Use a dedicated query development skill
- **CI/CD integration** - Use GitHub Actions documentation directly
- **Quick pattern searches** - Use SemgreAudit and improve project-rules files (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, .agents/instructions, local overrides) so the agent keeps accurate project context. Use when the user asks to check, audit, review, update, improve, or fix their AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md, mentions "project rules maintenance" or "agent context optimization", or when the codebase has changed enough that the rules file may be stale. Scans the repository for every rules file, grades each against a quality rubric, outputs a quality report, and applies targeted edits only after user approval.
Capture learnings from the current session into the project-rules file (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or local override) so future sessions benefit. Use when the user says "revise the rules", "update AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md with what we just learned", "save this to project memory", "remember this for next time", or at the end of a productive session when valuable context has emerged that is not yet documented. This complements agents-md-improver — improver audits, while this one captures.
Design a feature architecture by analyzing existing codebase patterns and conventions, then provide a comprehensive implementation blueprint with specific files to create or modify, component designs, data flows, and a build sequence. Use this skill when the user asks for an architecture design, an implementation plan for a non-trivial feature, or when dispatched as a sub-task during feature-dev architecture phase.
Deeply analyze an existing codebase feature by tracing execution paths, mapping architecture layers, understanding patterns and abstractions, and documenting dependencies. Use this skill when you need to understand how a feature works before modifying or extending it, when dispatched as a sub-task during feature-dev exploration, or when the user asks "how does X work in this codebase".
Review a pull request or a set of code changes for bugs, logic errors, and project-convention violations using a confidence-filtered, multi-agent process. Use this skill when the user asks to review a PR, audit pending changes, or inspect a diff for problems before merging.
Review code for bugs, logic errors, security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and adherence to project conventions, using confidence-based filtering to report only high-priority issues that truly matter. Use this skill when reviewing a small set of changes locally (such as unstaged diff), when dispatched as a sub-task during feature-dev quality review, or when the user wants a critique of a specific file or function.
Guide a feature implementation through a structured seven-phase workflow with deep codebase understanding, clarifying questions, parallel architecture design, and quality review. Use this skill when the user asks to build a new feature, add functionality, or wants a methodical approach to implementation rather than diving straight to code.
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality and accessible markup. Use this skill when the user asks to build or beautify web components, pages, applications, landing pages, dashboards, artifacts, or React/HTML/CSS UI. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics, then self-checks it against an objective accessibility and quality rubric.