greenfield
Parallel persona planning for new projects. Research agent runs first to build domain context, then Architect, PM, and Security agents run in parallel. Synthesis agent combines all perspectives into a detailed GSD-style PLAN.md with Tensions section.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wednesday-solutions/ai-agent-skills /tmp/greenfield && cp -r /tmp/greenfield/skills/greenfield ~/.claude/skills/greenfieldSKILL.md
# Greenfield Planning Skill
## Trigger
Run once per project: `ws-skills plan`
Reads `BRIEF.md` from the project root (or prompts for one). Asks 5 clarifying questions before planning.
## Flow
```
Brief + Q&A
↓
Research agent (sequential) ← domain landscape, ecosystem, hidden complexity
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Architect │ PM │ Security (parallel)│ ← spawn 3 subagents simultaneously
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
Synthesis ← combines all into PLAN.md
```
## Agents
### 1. Research (sequential — runs first)
Builds domain context that all other agents receive. Covers:
- Existing solutions and their weaknesses
- Standard and emerging tech stacks for this domain
- Technologies to avoid and why
- Non-obvious domain challenges
- Integration landscape (auth, payments, comms, etc.)
- Regulatory and compliance context
- Realistic timeline based on similar projects
- Hidden complexity — things that take 3x longer than expected
- Success patterns from the best products in this space
Output: `research.md`
### 2–4. Architect, PM, Security (parallel subagents)
Spawn all three simultaneously using the Agent tool. Each receives the full brief, Q&A, and research output as context.
```
Agent 1 — Architect
Agent 2 — PM ← launch all three in a single message, do not wait
Agent 3 — Security
```
Wait for all three to complete before running Synthesis.
**Architect** output: `architect.md`
- System design overview
- Tech stack with rationale per layer
- Module boundaries and interfaces
- Infrastructure and CI/CD
- Scaling strategy
- Technical risks
**PM** output: `pm.md`
- Phases with tasks and acceptance criteria
- Success metrics
- Out of scope items
- Assumptions
**Security** output: `security.md`
- Threat model (likelihood + impact)
- Data classification
- Auth strategy recommendation
- Compliance flags
- Concrete security tasks
- Urgent flags
### 5. Synthesis
Combines research + all three persona outputs into a single PLAN.md covering:
- Overview
- Clarifications table
- Tech stack
- Architecture
- Phases with tasks and acceptance criteria
- Security plan
- Success metrics
- Risks
- Tensions (unresolved disagreements between personas)
- Assumptions
- Out of scope
- Branch naming (GIT-OS format)
Output: `PLAN.md`
## Tools
| Action | Tool |
|--------|------|
| Read `BRIEF.md` | `Read` |
| Write persona output files (`architect.md`, `pm.md`, etc.) | `Write` |
| Spawn Architect, PM, Security personas in parallel | `Agent` (3 calls in one message) |
| Search the brief for keywords | `Grep` |
## Output Location
All files written to `.wednesday/plans/` in the target directory:
```
.wednesday/plans/
├── research.md ← domain context
├── architect.md ← technical design
├── pm.md ← phases and metrics
├── security.md ← threat model
└── PLAN.md ← combined PRD (primary output)
```
## Failure Handling
Each agent fails independently. If one fails, the others continue and synthesis runs with whatever data is available. Failed agents show `[partial fallback]` in the progress display.
## Rules
- Branch naming in PLAN.md must follow GIT-OS format
- Never generate `CODEBASE.md` for greenfield projects — it doesn't exist yet
- Cost target: under $0.20 per runUse when asked to audit a module, check its health, or assess whether it should be refactored. Runs structural query, risk check, and test generation automatically.
Use when a dev is new to the project, asks for an overview, or wants to get oriented quickly. Fills graph gaps then runs a guided codebase interview.
Full PR review orchestrator. Use when asked to review a PR or check if it is ready to merge. Runs blast radius + drift check on changed files, then hands off to pr-review for comment triage and fixes. Do NOT use pr-review directly for full reviews — use this.
Enforces architecture boundaries defined in PLAN.md. Use when a PR crosses module/service boundaries, when the dev asks "are we following the architecture?", or as a scheduled architecture health check. Not for querying what a module does — use brownfield-chat for that.
Unified codebase intelligence. Handles all questions about structure, logic, risk, and dependencies. Combines natural-language Q&A with deterministic lookups and pre-edit blast radius checks.
Pre-deploy and post-deploy checklist skill. Ensures env vars, migrations, CI, rollback plan, smoke tests, and monitoring are verified before and after every deployment.
Fix engine for PR review comments. Fetches review comments (Gemini bot or human), categorizes by impact, posts a prioritized fix queue, and applies fixes on dev approval. Called directly for quick fixes, or internally by pr-review-agent as part of full PR review.
Unified development and design standards. Enforces code quality (complexity < 8), strict naming conventions, and the mandatory use of approved UI component libraries.