appreciative-reframing
Appreciative Reframing identifies positive deviants and enabling conditions within a problem domain, then reframes challenges from deficit-based to asset-based perspectives using Appreciative Inquiry methodology. Use this skill when researching organizational, social, or systemic issues where discovering existing success patterns and working solutions would be more generative than focusing on failures or gaps.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine /tmp/appreciative-reframing && cp -r /tmp/appreciative-reframing/skills/appreciative-reframing ~/.claude/skills/appreciative-reframingSKILL.md
# Appreciative Reframing Instead of "what's wrong?", ask "what's already working and why?" ## Budget | Base SOP | Target | ±10% Range | |----------|--------|------------| | web-search | 25 | 22–28 | | web-research | 10 | 9–11 | | paper-overview | 25 | 22–28 | | paper-search | 15 | 13–17 | | paper-research | 5 | 4–6 | ## State Ledger ``` <HARD-GATE> | SOP | Done | Target | % | |-----|------|--------|---| | web-search | ? | 25 | ? | | web-research | ? | 10 | ? | | paper-overview | ? | 25 | ? | | paper-search | ? | 15 | ? | | paper-research | ? | 5 | ? | Budget Gate: OPEN/CLOSED (>=80% required to exit) </HARD-GATE> ``` ## Available SOPs **Import:** web-search, web-research, paper-overview, paper-search, paper-research **Subagent:** appreciative-discovery, reformulation-synthesis ## Execution Guidance Find positive deviants (cases that succeed despite the general problem), identify their enabling conditions, reframe the problem as "how to create more of what already works." <!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) --> ## Available SOPs Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop. | SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | appreciative-discovery | Search for positive deviants and extract transferable principles using Appreciative Inquiry. | | reformulation-synthesis | Compile all problem reformulation analyses into a coherent report with a recommended new problem definition. | <!-- END available-tables (generated) -->
Experiment-specific - summarize the DARE executor's research design into a clean research_result report, forced to write back into the spec file produced by formated-specs.
Experiment-specific - replaces writing-specs, emits DARE's 4-layer call plan as a clean research_graph schema. Last step forces load formated-result.
loss-1 judge - read a sample's full dialogue and decide whether the user simulator semantically enacted its Policy Card. check-blind.
loss-2 judge - pairwise quality comparison across the n rungs within one topic; decide monotonicity and endpoint separation. check-blind, D1-D5 only.
Strategy: Inference to the best explanation in the face of anomalies
Remove components one by one, observe system changes to reveal hidden
Map system architecture to ablatable units for ablation studies
Design ablation studies to isolate component contributions in ML systems