argument-mapping
Argument-mapping extracts claims from source material, links supporting and opposing evidence to each claim, assesses argument strength through evidence weight and diversity, and synthesizes coherent positions from complex debates. Use this skill to systematically analyze research domains where multiple competing claims and evidence sets need structured evaluation and integration into defensible conclusions.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine /tmp/argument-mapping && cp -r /tmp/argument-mapping/skills/argument-mapping ~/.claude/skills/argument-mappingSKILL.md
# Argument Mapping Map argument structures for research domains. Extracts claims from sources, links supporting and opposing evidence, assesses argument strength, and synthesizes coherent positions from complex debates. ## Manifest | Level | Count | Skills | |-------|-------|--------| | Strategy | 3 | claim-extraction, evidence-linking-arg, argument-synthesis | | Tactic | 2 | claim-decomposition, strength-assessment | | SOP | 6 | claim-page-creation, rebuttal-documentation, evidence-attachment, strength-scoring, argument-visualization, synthesis-report | ## Budget Table | Metric | Small | Medium | Large | |--------|-------|--------|-------| | Claims extracted | 10 | 25 | 50 | | Evidence links created | 15 | 40 | 80 | | Rebuttals documented | 3 | 10 | 20 | | Strength scores assigned | 10 | 25 | 50 | | Synthesis reports | 1 | 3 | 5 | ## Strategy Sequence (Reference, Not Prescription) 1. **claim-extraction** — identify and extract claims from source material 2. **evidence-linking-arg** — link evidence to claims (supporting, contradicting, qualifying) 3. **argument-synthesis** — synthesize positions from the argument graph ## MCP Tools Used - `vault_search` — find existing claims and evidence - `vault_add_edge` — create argument edges (supported_by, contradicts, derived_from) - `vault_query_graph` — trace argument chains - `vault_graph_stats` — assess argument coverage - `vault_lint` — validate structural integrity ## Context-Management <HARD-GATE> - Call `context-init` at campaign start - Call `context-checkpoint` after each strategy completes - Call `knowledge-compilation` after each strategy </HARD-GATE> ## Guiding Principles - **Claims are atomic.** Each claim page states exactly one proposition. Compound claims must be decomposed. - **Evidence is typed.** Every evidence link specifies its relationship: supports, contradicts, qualifies, or is irrelevant. - **Strength is earned.** A claim's strength comes from the weight and diversity of its evidence, not from authority or repetition. - **Steel-man first.** Before documenting rebuttals, ensure the strongest version of each claim is represented. - **Synthesis is not averaging.** The synthesis report identifies which claims survive scrutiny, not a compromise between all positions. <!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) --> ## Available Strategies Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop. | Strategy | When to use | | --- | --- | | argument-synthesis | Strategy for synthesizing argument positions — aggregate evidence, resolve contradictions, produce synthesis reports identifying which claims survive scrutiny. | | claim-extraction | Strategy for extracting claims from source material — identify propositions, decompose compound claims, classify claim types, create claim pages in the vault. | | evidence-linking-arg | Strategy for linking evidence to claims — find supporting/contradicting evidence, create typed edges, assess evidence quality, identify gaps in evidential coverage. | ## Available Tactics Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop. | Tactic | When to use | | --- | --- | | knowledge-compilation | Tactic for compiling research findings into vault pages — orchestrates page creation, updates, edge linking, and index maintenance. Minimum yield ≥3 page operations per invocation. | ## Available SOPs Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop. | SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | context-checkpoint | Append research process and results to the current Phase's context file. Each append MUST contain >=500 lines of markdown covering both process and results. Use this skill at plan-designated checkpoint points — typically after each strategy completes or at key decision nodes within a research Phase. | | context-init | Create a new context file for a research Phase. Called once at Phase start to initialize the file that subsequent context-checkpoint calls will append to. Use this skill whenever a new research Phase begins and a fresh context file is needed. | <!-- END available-tables (generated) -->
Experiment-specific - summarize the DARE executor's research design into a clean research_result report, forced to write back into the spec file produced by formated-specs.
Experiment-specific - replaces writing-specs, emits DARE's 4-layer call plan as a clean research_graph schema. Last step forces load formated-result.
loss-1 judge - read a sample's full dialogue and decide whether the user simulator semantically enacted its Policy Card. check-blind.
loss-2 judge - pairwise quality comparison across the n rungs within one topic; decide monotonicity and endpoint separation. check-blind, D1-D5 only.
Strategy: Inference to the best explanation in the face of anomalies
Remove components one by one, observe system changes to reveal hidden
Map system architecture to ablatable units for ablation studies
Design ablation studies to isolate component contributions in ML systems