assumption-criticality
The assumption-criticality skill systematically identifies and ranks assumptions in research by their impact on conclusions. It extracts stated assumptions, negates each one individually, re-derives conclusions under those altered conditions, and measures the sensitivity of results to each assumption change. Use this when evaluating research robustness, validating argument strength, or identifying which foundational claims most critically determine outcomes across web and academic sources.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine /tmp/assumption-criticality && cp -r /tmp/assumption-criticality/skills/assumption-criticality ~/.claude/skills/assumption-criticalitySKILL.md
# Assumption Criticality Rank assumptions by their impact on conclusions. ## Budget | Base SOP | Target | ±10% Range | |----------|--------|------------| | web-search | 30 | 27–33 | | web-research | 10 | 9–11 | | paper-overview | 30 | 27–33 | | paper-search | 20 | 18–22 | | paper-research | 10 | 9–11 | ## State Ledger ``` <HARD-GATE> | SOP | Done | Target | % | |-----|------|--------|---| | web-search | ? | 30 | ? | | web-research | ? | 10 | ? | | paper-overview | ? | 30 | ? | | paper-search | ? | 20 | ? | | paper-research | ? | 10 | ? | Budget Gate: OPEN/CLOSED (>=80% required to exit) </HARD-GATE> ``` ## Available Tactics - assumption-perturbation ## Available SOPs **Import:** web-search, web-research, paper-overview, paper-search, paper-research **Subagent:** assumption-extraction, negation-definition, re-derivation, conclusion-sensitivity-measurement ## Execution Guidance Extract assumptions, define negation for each, re-derive conclusions under negated assumption, measure how much the conclusion changes. Rank by conclusion sensitivity. <!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) --> ## Available Tactics Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop. | Tactic | When to use | | --- | --- | | deep-insight-assumption-perturbation | One-at-a-time assumption perturbation — extract assumptions, define negations, re-derive conclusions under each negation, measure sensitivity. Identifies which assumptions are load-bearing. | ## Available SOPs Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop. | SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | conclusion-sensitivity-measurement | Quantify how much conclusions change across all assumption negations and produce a sensitivity ranking. | | deep-insight-assumption-extraction | Systematically extract all assumptions (stated, implicit, boundary, mathematical, practical) from a method or model. | | negation-definition | Define strongest plausible alternatives (negations) for each assumption to enable perturbation analysis. | | re-derivation | Re-derive conclusions under a negated assumption, tracking where the derivation diverges from the original. | <!-- END available-tables (generated) -->
Experiment-specific - summarize the DARE executor's research design into a clean research_result report, forced to write back into the spec file produced by formated-specs.
Experiment-specific - replaces writing-specs, emits DARE's 4-layer call plan as a clean research_graph schema. Last step forces load formated-result.
loss-1 judge - read a sample's full dialogue and decide whether the user simulator semantically enacted its Policy Card. check-blind.
loss-2 judge - pairwise quality comparison across the n rungs within one topic; decide monotonicity and endpoint separation. check-blind, D1-D5 only.
Strategy: Inference to the best explanation in the face of anomalies
Remove components one by one, observe system changes to reveal hidden
Map system architecture to ablatable units for ablation studies
Design ablation studies to isolate component contributions in ML systems