issue-progress-tracking
GitHub issue workflow ceremony using gh CLI — labels issues as in-progress, creates feature branches (issue/N-description), commits with issue references, posts progress comments, and links PRs with Closes #N. Keeps issues in sync with development work. Use when starting work on an issue, tracking progress, or completing work with a PR.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit /tmp/issue-progress-tracking && cp -r /tmp/issue-progress-tracking/plugins/ork/skills/issue-progress-tracking ~/.claude/skills/issue-progress-trackingSKILL.md
# Issue Progress Tracking Ceremony guide for tracking GitHub issue progress via `gh` CLI. Ensures issues stay updated as work progresses from start to PR. ## Quick Start ```bash /ork:issue-progress-tracking 123 ``` --- ## Phase 1: Start Work Label the issue and create a feature branch: ```bash # Move issue to in-progress gh issue edit $ARGUMENTS[0] --add-label "status:in-progress" --remove-label "status:todo" gh issue comment $ARGUMENTS[0] --body "Starting work on this issue." # Create feature branch git checkout -b issue/$ARGUMENTS[0]-brief-description ``` **Rules:** - Always branch from the default branch (main/dev) - Branch name format: `issue/<number>-<brief-description>` - Never work directly on main/dev --- ## Phase 2: During Work — Small Commits Commit after each logical step, not at the end. Every commit references the issue: ```bash # Each commit references the issue number git commit -m "feat(#$ARGUMENTS[0]): add user model Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>" ``` **Rules:** - One logical change per commit (atomic) - Reference issue in every commit: `type(#N): description` - Commit early and often — don't accumulate a massive diff --- ## Phase 3: Report Progress (Long Implementations) For multi-step work, post progress updates: ```bash gh issue comment $ARGUMENTS[0] --body "Progress update: - Completed: database schema, API endpoints - In progress: frontend components - Remaining: tests, documentation" ``` **When to post updates:** - After completing a major milestone - When blocked or changing approach - Before stepping away from a long task --- ## Phase 4: Complete Work Create the PR and update labels: ```bash # Create PR that closes the issue gh pr create \ --title "feat(#$ARGUMENTS[0]): brief description" \ --body "Closes #$ARGUMENTS[0] ## Changes - Change 1 - Change 2 ## Test Plan - [ ] Unit tests pass - [ ] Manual verification" # Update issue status gh issue edit $ARGUMENTS[0] --add-label "status:in-review" --remove-label "status:in-progress" ``` --- ## Rules Quick Reference | Rule | Impact | What It Covers | |------|--------|----------------| | [Start Work Ceremony](rules/start-work-ceremony.md) | HIGH | Branch creation, label updates, initial comment | | [Small Commits](rules/small-commits.md) | HIGH | Atomic commits referencing issues | **Total: 2 rules across 2 categories** --- ## Key Decisions | Decision | Choice | Rationale | |----------|--------|-----------| | Label prefix | `status:` | Consistent with GitHub conventions | | Branch format | `issue/<N>-desc` | Links branch to issue automatically | | Commit reference | `type(#N):` | Conventional commits + issue linking | | Progress comments | Manual | Keeps humans in the loop | --- ## Common Mistakes 1. **Starting work without labeling** — team loses visibility into who is working on what 2. **Giant commits at the end** — makes review harder and history useless for bisect 3. **Forgetting to link PR to issue** — issue stays open after merge 4. **Not updating labels on PR creation** — issue shows "in-progress" during review 5. **Closing issues manually with `gh issue close`** — issues are closed ONLY by merging a PR with `Closes #N` in the body. During work, comment progress with `gh issue comment`; never close directly. --- ## Related Skills - `ork:commit` — Commit with conventional format - `ork:fix-issue` — Full issue resolution workflow - `ork:implement` — Feature implementation with parallel agents - `ork:create-pr` — Create pull requests
Accessibility patterns for WCAG 2.2 compliance, keyboard focus management, React Aria component patterns, cognitive inclusion, native HTML-first philosophy, and user preference honoring. Use when implementing screen reader support, keyboard navigation, ARIA patterns, focus traps, accessible component libraries, reduced motion, or cognitive accessibility.
Agent orchestration patterns for agentic loops, multi-agent coordination, alternative frameworks, and multi-scenario workflows. Use when building autonomous agent loops, coordinating multiple agents, evaluating CrewAI/AutoGen/Swarm, or orchestrating complex multi-step scenarios.
AI-assisted UI generation patterns for json-render, v0.app, Google Stitch, Bolt Cloud, and Cursor workflows. Covers prompt engineering for component and full-stack app generation, review checklists for AI-generated code, design token injection, refactoring for design system conformance, and CI gates for quality assurance. Use when generating UI components with AI tools, rendering multi-surface MCP visual output, reviewing AI-generated code, or integrating AI output into design systems.
Queries local analytics across OrchestKit projects for agent usage, skill frequency, hook timing, team activity, session replay, cost estimation, and model delegation trends. Privacy-safe with hashed project IDs. Supports time-range filtering and comparative analysis. Use when reviewing performance, estimating costs, or understanding usage patterns.
Animation and motion design patterns using Motion library (formerly Framer Motion) and View Transitions API. Use when implementing component animations, page transitions, micro-interactions, gesture-driven UIs, or ensuring motion accessibility with prefers-reduced-motion.
API design patterns for REST/GraphQL framework design, versioning strategies, and RFC 9457 error handling. Use when designing API endpoints, choosing versioning schemes, implementing Problem Details errors, or building OpenAPI specifications.
Use this skill when documenting significant architectural decisions. Provides ADR templates following the Nygard format with sections for context, decision, consequences, and alternatives. Use when writing ADRs, recording decisions, or evaluating options.
Architecture validation and patterns for clean architecture, backend structure enforcement, project structure validation, test standards, and context-aware sizing. Use when designing system boundaries, enforcing layered architecture, validating project structure, defining test standards, or choosing the right architecture tier for project scope.