design-docs
This skill generates and maintains structured design documentation for a project by delegating work to the `docs_design` agent, which authors version-controlled files in the target repository's docs directory. Use it to create fresh design documentation from system descriptions or synchronize existing docs to reflect changes in code and project specifications.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm /tmp/design-docs && cp -r /tmp/design-docs/.opencode/skills/design-docs ~/.claude/skills/design-docsSKILL.md
# Design-Doc Generation & Sync Protocol
Generate or maintain the project's structured design documentation. The work is delegated to the `docs_design` agent (a design-doc-author role variant of the docs agent). This mode authors a fixed set of version-controlled docs in the **target project repo** (NOT under `.swarm/`). It does NOT modify source code, does NOT call `declare_scope`, and does NOT touch `.swarm/spec.md`, `CHANGELOG.md`, or `docs/releases/pending/*`.
### MODE: DESIGN_DOCS
## Step 0 — Parse Header
Parse the `[MODE: DESIGN_DOCS ...]` header to extract:
- `out`: output directory, project-relative (default `docs`)
- `lang`: target language for `reference/` docs, or `auto` (default `auto`)
- `update`: boolean — `true` = sync existing docs to current code/spec; `false` = generate fresh
- the trailing free text = the system description (required when `update=false`)
If the header is malformed, report the error and stop.
## Step 1 — Preconditions
1. Confirm `design_docs.enabled` is true (the `docs_design` agent only exists when enabled). If it is not, tell the user to set `design_docs.enabled: true` in `opencode-swarm.json` and stop.
2. If a spec-staleness block is active (`.swarm/spec-staleness.json` present), resolve/acknowledge spec staleness FIRST — otherwise design-doc writes may be blocked by the guardrail. Do not blindly retry on `SPEC_STALENESS_BLOCK`.
3. Read `.swarm/spec.md` if present — it is the authoritative requirements source (FR-### IDs). The design docs must be consistent with it.
## Step 2 — Index Existing State (always)
Have the `docs_design` agent (or `doc_scan`) index `<out>/` to discover any existing design docs. If `<out>/reference/traceability.json` exists, it is the section-ID registry — load it. Existing section IDs MUST be preserved on regeneration.
## Step 3 — Generate or Sync
Dispatch the **`docs_design`** agent (the active swarm's `docs_design` — never the standard `docs` agent) with:
- `TASK`, `MODE` (generate|sync), `OUT_DIR`, `LANGUAGE`
- For sync: `FILES CHANGED` and `CHANGES SUMMARY` from the current phase/diff
- `SKILLS: file:.opencode/skills/design-docs/SKILL.md` (this skill)
The agent owns exactly these files under `<out>` and creates NOTHING else:
```
<out>/
├── domain.md # 100% language-agnostic. Entities in neutral notation
│ # (field: type-class), domain invariants. ZERO framework
│ # names in normative text. Section IDs: D-###
├── technical-spec.md # Language-agnostic architecture: layers, dependency rules,
│ # contract SHAPES (inputs→outputs→error-kinds), algorithms,
│ # invariants. + the traceability table. Section IDs: S-###
├── behavior-spec.md # 100% language-agnostic Given/When/Then specs. IDs: B-###
├── design-changelog.md # Keep-a-Changelog log of design-doc changes (NOT release notes)
└── reference/ # ALL [INCIDENTAL] language/framework-specific material here.
├── reference-impl.md # Exact signatures, CLI strings, SQL, code. Mapped to
│ # spec sections by ID. Section IDs: R-###
├── idiom-notes.md # "Here is how the reference solved X" — examples only.
└── traceability.json # Machine-readable section-ID registry (source of truth)
```
## Step 4 — Invariants the docs MUST satisfy
- **Language-agnostic normative text**: `domain.md`, `technical-spec.md`, and `behavior-spec.md` contain ZERO framework/library/language names in normative content. All such material lives ONLY in `reference/`.
- **Version header** on every doc:
`<!-- design-doc: <name> version: <phase-or-counter> generated: <ISO-8601> spec-hash: <8 chars> -->`
- **Stable section IDs**: assigned once, never renumbered. `D-###` domain, `S-###` technical-spec, `B-###` behavior-spec, `R-###` reference. On sync, reuse every existing ID; mint new IDs only for genuinely new sections.
- **Traceability footer** ending each section: `> Traceability: FR-012, FR-013 | invariant: <id-or-none>`.
- **traceability.json** kept in sync: `{ "schema_version": 1, "sections": [ { "section_id", "doc", "title", "spec_frs": [], "invariants": [], "code_anchors": [] } ] }`. `technical-spec.md` renders a human-readable mirror table `| Doc Section | Spec FR | Invariant | Code anchors |`.
- **design-changelog.md**: append one entry per generate/sync under `## [Unreleased]` (Added/Changed/Removed), e.g. `- <ISO date> phase <N>: <sections touched> (<FR refs>)`. This file is SEPARATE from release-please artifacts — never edit `CHANGELOG.md` or `docs/releases/pending/*` here.
## Step 5 — Verify & Report
1. Confirm the agent created/updated only the allowed files and `traceability.json` is consistent with the docs.
2. Confirm no normative doc names a framework (spot-check) and every section has an ID + traceability footer.
3. Report `UPDATED` / `ADDED` / `REMOVED` / `SUMMARY` back to the user.
## Notes on the PHASE-WRAP sync path
During PHASE-WRAP, the deterministic design-doc drift check (`runDesignDocDriftCheck`) writes `.swarm/doc-drift-phase-N.json`. If the verdict is `DOC_STALE` and `design_docs.enabled`, dispatch `docs_design` in **sync** mode for the affected sections only, then append a design-changelog entry. This is advisory and non-blocking — never block phase completion on design-doc lag.>
Run a rigorous, quote-grounded codebase review or security/QA/accessibility/performance/AI-slop/enhancement audit. Use for full-repo or large-subsystem review reports; not for normal implementation. Performs Phase 0 inventory, selected exhaustive tracks with non-diluting depth, coverage closure, reviewer/critic validation, and writes .swarm/review-v8 artifacts without modifying source files.
>
>
Use when asked to trace, investigate, root-cause, plan, fix, close, or prepare a PR for a GitHub issue or bug report. Runs an evidence-first issue workflow: GitHub intake, reproduction, reasoning-guided localization, no-gap fix planning, independent critic review, user approval gate, implementation, tests, and PR-ready closure.
>
>