request-analyzer
Request-analyzer classifies incoming user requests to determine intent, request type (design/validate/debug/document), complexity level, and identifies vague requirements before routing to specialist agents. Use this skill when the cto-orchestrator receives new requests that need structured analysis and clarification to enable intelligent delegation to the appropriate specialist agent.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-cto-team /tmp/request-analyzer && cp -r /tmp/request-analyzer/skills/request-analyzer ~/.claude/skills/request-analyzerSKILL.md
# Request Analyzer Classifies incoming requests to enable intelligent routing and identify clarification needs before delegating to specialist agents. ## When to Use - When receiving a new user request that needs classification - When determining which specialist agent should handle a request - When identifying if requirements are too vague to proceed - When detecting buzzwords that need to be challenged ## Analysis Framework ### Step 1: Detect Intent Classify the primary intent: | Intent | Indicators | Route | |--------|------------|-------| | **Strategic** | "roadmap", "strategy", "plan", "prioritize", "decide" | May need validation | | **Implementation** | "build", "create", "implement", "design", "architect" | Design work | | **Debugging** | "fix", "broken", "error", "slow", "not working" | Debug/investigate | | **Documentation** | "document", "explain", "describe", "write docs" | Documentation | ### Step 2: Classify Request Type | Type | Key Phrases | Primary Agent | |------|-------------|---------------| | **Design** | "How should I build...", "What architecture...", "Design a system..." | cto-architect | | **Validate** | "Is this plan solid?", "Thoughts on...", "Review my roadmap..." | strategic-cto-mentor | | **Debug** | "Why is X slow?", "Fix this error...", "Troubleshoot..." | debug-helper | | **Document** | "Write documentation for...", "Explain how..." | docs-writer | | **Review** | "Review this code...", "Check for issues..." | code-reviewer | ### Step 3: Assess Complexity | Complexity | Characteristics | Execution Pattern | |------------|-----------------|-------------------| | **Single** | Clear scope, one domain, obvious routing | Direct to one agent | | **Sequential** | Multiple phases, depends on previous output | Agent chain | | **Parallel** | Independent domains, can run simultaneously | Multiple agents in parallel | ### Step 4: Identify Vague Terms Scan for buzzwords that require clarification. See [buzzword-dictionary.md](buzzword-dictionary.md) for the complete list. **Common red flags:** - "AI-powered" - What specific AI capability? - "scale" - What numbers? From what to what? - "fast" / "soon" - What timeline exactly? - "simple" - Simple for whom? What constraints? - "modern" - What specific technologies? ### Step 5: Detect Missing Context Check for required context based on request type: **For Design Requests:** - [ ] Expected user/traffic scale - [ ] Budget constraints - [ ] Timeline requirements - [ ] Team size and expertise - [ ] Existing infrastructure **For Validation Requests:** - [ ] Current state or existing plan - [ ] Business goals and constraints - [ ] Timeline and resources - [ ] Success criteria ## Output Format Provide analysis in this structure: ``` ## Request Analysis **Intent**: [strategic | implementation | debugging | documentation] **Type**: [design | validate | debug | document | review] **Complexity**: [single | sequential | parallel] ### Vague Terms Detected - "[term]" - needs clarification: [what to ask] ### Missing Context - [missing information item] ### Suggested Routing **Primary Agent**: [agent name] **Rationale**: [why this agent] ### Clarification Needed [yes/no] - [brief explanation] ### Recommended Next Step [what to do next - clarify or delegate] ``` ## Examples ### Example 1: Vague Request **User**: "I want to add AI capabilities to my app" **Analysis**: - **Intent**: Implementation - **Type**: Design - **Complexity**: Unknown (needs clarification) - **Vague Terms**: "AI capabilities" - What specific problem are we solving? - **Missing Context**: Scale, budget, timeline, team, existing stack - **Clarification Needed**: Yes - **Next Step**: Use clarification-protocol before routing ### Example 2: Clear Design Request **User**: "Design a real-time notification system for 100K users, using our existing PostgreSQL database and Node.js backend" **Analysis**: - **Intent**: Implementation - **Type**: Design - **Complexity**: Single - **Vague Terms**: None - **Missing Context**: Timeline, budget (nice to have but not blocking) - **Suggested Routing**: cto-architect - **Clarification Needed**: No (can proceed with optional clarification) ### Example 3: Validation Request **User**: "Here's my Q2 roadmap - migrate to microservices, add real-time features, and launch mobile app. Thoughts?" **Analysis**: - **Intent**: Strategic - **Type**: Validate - **Complexity**: Single - **Vague Terms**: None - **Missing Context**: Team size, current architecture state - **Suggested Routing**: strategic-cto-mentor - **Clarification Needed**: Mild (some context helpful but not blocking) ## References - [Classification Criteria](classification-criteria.md) - Detailed routing logic - [Buzzword Dictionary](buzzword-dictionary.md) - Common vague terms to challenge
Detect common technical and organizational anti-patterns in proposals, architectures, and plans. Use when strategic-cto-mentor needs to identify red flags before they become problems.
Recommend architecture patterns (monolith, microservices, serverless, modular monolith) based on scale, team size, and constraints. Use when cto-architect needs to select the right architectural approach for a new system or migration.
Identify and challenge implicit assumptions in plans, proposals, and technical decisions. Use when strategic-cto-mentor needs to surface hidden assumptions and wishful thinking before they become costly mistakes.
Generate targeted clarifying questions (2-3 max) that challenge vague requirements and extract missing context. Use after request-analyzer identifies clarification needs, before routing to specialist agents. Helps cto-orchestrator avoid delegating unclear requirements.
Infrastructure and development cost estimation for technical projects. Use when planning budgets, evaluating build vs buy decisions, or projecting TCO for architecture choices.
Get CTO-level strategic and technical guidance
Use this agent when you need comprehensive technical architecture guidance, strategic technology decisions, or system design for complex web/mobile applications with ML/AI integration. Specifically invoke this agent when
Use this agent when you need strategic technical leadership, complex task orchestration across multiple domains, or help translating business requirements into technical execution. This agent excels at breaking down ambiguous requests, routing work to specialized agents, and maintaining strategic context throughout complex projects.