agent-orchestration-advisor
Design multi-agent AI workflows with clear boundaries, handoffs, and monitoring. Use when a complex PM task should run as parallel specialized agents instead of one linear process.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills /tmp/agent-orchestration-advisor && cp -r /tmp/agent-orchestration-advisor/skills/agent-orchestration-advisor ~/.claude/skills/agent-orchestration-advisorSKILL.md
## Purpose Guide product managers through designing **multi-agent workflows**—breaking complex, repetitive PM tasks into parallel, specialized AI agents rather than linear, sequential processes or manual execution. Use this to transition from "document-heavy administrator" to "systems-level orchestrator" who coordinates a "living system" of AI agents, human teams, and market data interacting continuously. **Key Shift:** From linear project management (one task at a time) to orchestration (multiple agents working simultaneously, each with clear boundaries and handoffs). This is not about prompt writing—it's about **architecting workflows where AI agents handle repetitive research, synthesis, and validation while PMs focus on strategy and decision-making**. ## Input **Works best with:** The workflow or recurring task you want to orchestrate — described in a sentence or two, however manual or messy it is today. **Also useful:** Where it breaks down now (too slow, too sequential, too dependent on you), the tools your team already uses, and whether you've worked through [context-engineering-advisor](../context-engineering-advisor/SKILL.md) first (it's the prerequisite discipline). Anything supplied with the invocation itself — text after the skill name, a pasted context dump, or an appended `ARGUMENTS:` line — counts as answers already given. Use it and skip whatever it covers; don't re-ask. **Arriving empty-handed? That works too.** The advisor opens by asking which PM workflow eats the most of your week, then walks the four orchestration dimensions against it. **Example invocation:** `Design an orchestration for our weekly competitive intel: today one PM spends 6 hours scraping, summarizing, and briefing — sequentially.` ## Key Concepts ### Orchestration vs. Project Management | Dimension | Project Management | Orchestration | |-----------|-------------------|---------------| | **Approach** | Linear oversight of schedules and human tasks | Managing "living system" where AI agents, humans, and data interact continuously | | **Task Flow** | Sequential (finish A, then B, then C) | Parallel (A, B, C run simultaneously) | | **PM Role** | Document-heavy administrator | Systems-level leader coordinating automated systems + human judgment | | **Focus** | Output (features shipped) | Outcome (business results, learning velocity) | | **Risk Management** | Manual tracking and mitigation | Real-time monitoring with agentic systems flagging gaps | **Critical Insight:** Orchestration is not about replacing humans—it's about **force-multiplying human judgment** by automating repetitive, time-consuming tasks. --- ### The Four Dimensions of Orchestration #### 1. **Coordination of Multi-Agent Workflows** Breaking complex tasks into specialized agents that run in parallel. **Example:** - **Manual (Old):** PM spends 8 hours compiling competitive intel, then 4 hours synthesizing customer feedback, then 3 hours identifying roadmap gaps = 15 hours sequentially - **Orchestrated (New):** Three agents run simultaneously: - Agent A: Competitive intel (research agent) - Agent B: Customer synthesis (synthesis agent) - Agent C: Roadmap gap analysis (analysis agent) - Total time: 8 hours (limited by slowest agent), PM reviews outputs in 2 hours = 10 hours total, 5 hours saved **Key Principle:** Shift from manual selection to **hypothesis orchestration**—agents generate hypotheses, PM validates and decides. #### 2. **Leadership of Cross-Functional AI Pods** Governing diverse teams (data scientists, ML engineers, compliance, ethicists) to ensure solutions are scalable, ethical, and aligned. **What it includes:** - Embedding diversity-aware workflows - Risk management (not afterthought) - Ethical orchestration (ensuring AI doesn't "go rogue") - Cross-functional alignment (engineering, compliance, design) **PM Role:** Guardian of Governance—ensures AI systems reflect company values. #### 3. **Launch Control Tower Function** Real-time monitoring of organizational readiness across functions using agentic systems to flag gaps before critical failures. **What it monitors:** - Support readiness (docs, training, escalation paths) - Marketing readiness (messaging, assets, GTM plan) - Operations readiness (infrastructure, scaling, monitoring) **Key Principle:** Agentic systems act as early warning system—flag gaps before they become blockers. #### 4. **Strategic Intent Alignment (Context Engineering Applied)** Feeding AI agents the correct mix of mission, constraints, and priorities to ensure automated decisions reflect company values. **Connection:** This is **context engineering at the orchestration layer**. See `context-engineering-advisor` for foundations. **What agents need:** - Product constraints (what we will/won't build) - Strategic priorities (what matters most right now) - Operational definitions (shared glossary) - Evidence standards (what counts as validation) --- ### The Four AI Management Workflows (Productside Blueprint) Every PM must master these workflows to move fast while staying grounded: 1. **Context Engineering** ✅ (Foundation) - Create AI workspace that remembers product domain, research, JTBD, personas, constraints - **Skill:** `context-engineering-advisor` 2. **Synthetic Evals** 📋 (Quality Assurance) - Automated validation tests for AI reasoning - Generate synthetic data, run workflows against traces - Eliminates 80% of hallucination risk 3. **Agentic Workflows** ← **We're here** - Agents handle repetitive tasks (competitive intel, customer synthesis, roadmap gaps) - PM focuses on strategy 4. **Vibe Coding** 📋 (Rapid Prototyping) - Generate clickable prototypes from context workspace - Collapse feedback loops from weeks to hours - **Connection:** `pol-probe-advisor` (Vibe-Coded PoL Probes) --- ### AI-Shaped Problems (Teresa Torres) **What makes a problem "AI-shaped"?** - Previously difficult to scale due to human involvement (e.g.,
Evaluate acquisition channels using unit economics, customer quality, and scalability. Use when deciding whether to scale, test, or kill a growth channel.
Assess whether your product work is AI-first or AI-shaped. Use when evaluating AI maturity and choosing the next team capability to build.
Understand the PM-to-Director transition through altitude and horizon thinking. Use when diagnosing scope, time-horizon, or leadership-level gaps.
Map evidence-backed growth options across the Ansoff Matrix with risk-rated sequencing. Use when the question is where the next tranche of growth comes from, and at what risk.
The protocol behind every investigation skill. Use when AI research must proceed without you: search-plan gate, Fact/Inference/Assumption labels, confidence stacking, diffable outputs.
Research and draft a competitive battle card from public evidence — every claim labeled and sourced. Use when a rep needs a field-action card, not a research report.
Diagnose SaaS business health across growth, retention, efficiency, and capital. Use when preparing a business review or prioritizing urgent fixes.
Research a company, industry, or competitor set using web search and seven analytical lenses. Use when you need structured intel that feeds downstream PM skills.