business-health-diagnostic
The business-health-diagnostic Claude Code skill evaluates SaaS company vitality by analyzing growth, retention, unit economics, and capital efficiency metrics within a unified framework. Use it when preparing board materials, quarterly business reviews, or fundraising documents to identify systemic issues, prioritize fixes by urgency level, and assess alignment with stage-specific benchmarks for early, growth, and scale stage companies.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills /tmp/business-health-diagnostic && cp -r /tmp/business-health-diagnostic/skills/business-health-diagnostic ~/.claude/skills/business-health-diagnosticSKILL.md
## Purpose Diagnose overall SaaS business health by analyzing growth, retention, unit economics, and capital efficiency metrics together. Use this to identify problems early, prioritize actions by urgency, and deliver a comprehensive health scorecard for board meetings, quarterly reviews, or fundraising preparation. This is not a single-metric check—it's a holistic diagnostic that connects revenue, retention, economics, and efficiency to reveal systemic issues and opportunities. ## Input **Works best with:** Whatever business metrics you have access to — growth rate, NRR/GRR, CAC payback, burn multiple, runway. Partial data is fine; the diagnostic flags what's missing. **Also useful:** The occasion (board meeting, quarterly review, fundraise prep) and what you already suspect is wrong. Anything supplied with the invocation itself — text after the skill name, a pasted context dump, or an appended `ARGUMENTS:` line — counts as answers already given. Use it and skip whatever it covers; don't re-ask. **Arriving empty-handed? That works too.** The diagnostic opens by asking your company stage and which metric families you can pull. **Example invocation:** `Run a health check: $8M ARR, 60% YoY growth, NRR 96%, CAC payback 21 months, 14 months runway — board meeting in 3 weeks.` ## Key Concepts ### The Business Health Framework A SaaS business is healthy when four dimensions work together: 1. **Growth & Retention** — Are you growing and keeping customers? - Revenue growth rate - NRR (Net Revenue Retention) - Churn rate - Quick Ratio 2. **Unit Economics** — Is the business model profitable at the customer level? - CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) - LTV (Lifetime Value) - LTV:CAC ratio - Payback period - Gross margin 3. **Capital Efficiency** — Are you using cash efficiently? - Burn rate - Runway - Rule of 40 - Magic Number 4. **Strategic Position** — Are you positioned for sustainable success? - Market positioning (below, at, above market pricing) - Competitive moat (network effects, data, brand) - Revenue concentration risk - Operating leverage ### Stage-Specific Benchmarks **Early Stage (Pre-$10M ARR):** - Focus: Product-market fit, unit economics - Growth: >50% YoY - LTV:CAC: >3:1 - Gross Margin: >70% - Runway: >12 months - Acceptable: Negative margins, high burn (if unit economics work) **Growth Stage ($10M-$50M ARR):** - Focus: Scaling efficiently - Growth: >40% YoY - NRR: >100% - Rule of 40: >40 - Magic Number: >0.75 - Acceptable: Moderate burn if growth is strong **Scale Stage ($50M+ ARR):** - Focus: Profitability, efficiency - Growth: >25% YoY - NRR: >110% - Rule of 40: >40 - Profit Margin: >10% - Required: Positive or near-positive cash flow ### Red Flag Categories **Critical (Fix immediately):** - Runway <6 months - LTV:CAC <1.5:1 - Churn accelerating cohort-over-cohort - NRR <90% - Magic Number <0.3 **High Priority (Fix within quarter):** - Rule of 40 <25 - Payback >24 months - Quick Ratio <2 - Gross margin <60% - Revenue concentration >50% in top 10 customers **Medium Priority (Address within 6 months):** - NRR 90-100% (flat, not growing) - Magic Number 0.3-0.5 - Operating leverage negative - Churn rate stable but high (>5% monthly) ### Anti-Patterns (What This Is NOT) - **Not a single metric:** "Revenue is growing 50%, we're great!" (ignoring burn, churn, unit economics) - **Not stage-agnostic:** Early-stage burn is acceptable; scale-stage burn is a problem - **Not static:** Health is directional—are metrics improving or degrading? - **Not just numbers:** Context matters (competitive pressure, market changes, team capacity) ### When to Use This Framework **Use this when:** - Preparing for board meetings or investor updates - Quarterly business reviews (QBR) - Fundraising preparation (know your numbers) - Annual planning (identify improvement areas) - You suspect problems but can't pinpoint them - New PM/exec joining and needs health assessment **Don't use this when:** - You're pre-revenue (focus on product-market fit first) - You're in pure research mode (not enough data) - You need tactical guidance (use specific skills: feature, channel, pricing) --- ### Facilitation Source of Truth Use [`workshop-facilitation`](../workshop-facilitation/SKILL.md) as the default interaction protocol for this skill. It defines: - session heads-up + entry mode (Guided, Context dump, Best guess) - one-question turns with plain-language prompts - progress labels (for example, Context Qx/8 and Scoring Qx/5) - interruption handling and pause/resume behavior - numbered recommendations at decision points - quick-select numbered response options for regular questions (include `Other (specify)` when useful) This file defines the domain-specific assessment content. If there is a conflict, follow this file's domain logic. ## Application This interactive skill asks **up to 4 adaptive questions**, then delivers a comprehensive diagnostic with prioritized recommendations. --- ### Step 0: Gather Context **Agent asks:** "Let's diagnose your business health. I'll need metrics across four dimensions: growth, retention, unit economics, and capital efficiency. **Company context:** - Stage: (Pre-$10M ARR, $10M-$50M ARR, $50M+ ARR) - Business model: (PLG, sales-led, hybrid) - Target market: (SMB, mid-market, enterprise, mixed) **Why this matters:** Benchmarks vary by stage. Early-stage optimizes for growth; scale-stage optimizes for efficiency. Please provide the following metrics. Use 'unknown' if you don't have a metric." --- ### Step 1: Growth & Retention Metrics **Agent asks:** "**Growth & Retention:** 1. **Revenue:** - Current MRR or ARR: $___ - Revenue growth rate: ___% (MoM or YoY) 2. **Retention:** - Monthly churn rate: ___% - NRR (Net Revenue Retention): ___% - Quick Ratio: ___ (or I can calculate it) 3. **Expansion:** - Expansion revenue as % of total MRR: ___% 4. **Cohort trends:** - Are re
Evaluate acquisition channels using unit economics, customer quality, and scalability. Use when deciding whether to scale, test, or kill a growth channel.
Design multi-agent AI workflows with clear boundaries, handoffs, and monitoring. Use when a complex PM task should run as parallel specialized agents instead of one linear process.
Assess whether your product work is AI-first or AI-shaped. Use when evaluating AI maturity and choosing the next team capability to build.
Understand the PM-to-Director transition through altitude and horizon thinking. Use when diagnosing scope, time-horizon, or leadership-level gaps.
Map evidence-backed growth options across the Ansoff Matrix with risk-rated sequencing. Use when the question is where the next tranche of growth comes from, and at what risk.
The protocol behind every investigation skill. Use when AI research must proceed without you: search-plan gate, Fact/Inference/Assumption labels, confidence stacking, diffable outputs.
Research and draft a competitive battle card from public evidence — every claim labeled and sourced. Use when a rep needs a field-action card, not a research report.
Research a company, industry, or competitor set using web search and seven analytical lenses. Use when you need structured intel that feeds downstream PM skills.