Skip to main content
ClaudeWave
Skill63 estrellas del repoactualizado 3d ago

go-code-review

Reviews Go code for idiomatic patterns, error handling, concurrency safety, and common mistakes. Use when reviewing .go files, checking error handling, goroutine usage, or interface design. Covers generics (Go 1.18+), errors.Join and slog (Go 1.21+), and Go 1.22 loop variable semantics.

Instalar en Claude Code
Copiar
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/existential-birds/beagle /tmp/go-code-review && cp -r /tmp/go-code-review/plugins/beagle-go/skills/go-code-review ~/.claude/skills/go-code-review
Después abre una sesión nueva de Claude Code; el skill carga automáticamente.

SKILL.md

# Go Code Review

## Review Workflow

Follow this sequence **in order**. Do not emit findings until every **Pass** below is satisfied.

1. **Baseline `go.mod`** — Open `go.mod` and read the `go` directive.  
   **Pass:** You can state the exact `go X.YY` value (in the review preamble or working notes). Apply version-gated advice only when it matches this baseline (loop capture pre-1.22, `slog`/structured logging from 1.21, `errors.Join` from 1.20).

2. **Read surrounding code** — For each changed `.go` file, read full functions or logical units that contain the edits, not only the diff hunk.  
   **Pass:** At least one full enclosing function (or package-level `init`/var block) containing the change was read per changed file.

3. **Scope the checklist** — Decide which [Review Checklist](#review-checklist) blocks apply (error handling, concurrency, interfaces/types, resources, naming). Load [references](#quick-reference) for those blocks; skip blocks that are irrelevant to the diff.  
   **Pass:** The review (or working notes) lists which checklist blocks you applied, or marks blocks N/A with a one-line reason tied to the diff (e.g. “no concurrency in change”).

4. **Pre-report verification** — Load and follow [review-verification-protocol](../review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md).  
   **Pass:** The protocol’s **Pre-Report Verification Checklist** is satisfied for each finding you will report (actual code read, surrounding context checked, “wrong” vs “different style” distinguished, etc.).

## Hard gates (same sequence, shorter)

| Step | Objective pass condition |
| --- | --- |
| 1 | `go X.YY` from `go.mod` is recorded before version-specific advice. |
| 2 | Full enclosing context read per changed file, not diff-only. |
| 3 | In-scope checklist blocks listed or N/A with diff-tied reason; references opened as needed. |
| 4 | `review-verification-protocol` completed for every reported issue. |

## Output Format

Report findings as:

```text
[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE
Severity: Critical | Major | Minor | Informational
Description of the issue and why it matters.
```

## Quick Reference

| Issue Type | Reference |
|------------|-----------|
| Missing error checks, wrapping, errors.Join | [references/error-handling.md](references/error-handling.md) |
| Race conditions, channel misuse, goroutine lifecycle | [references/concurrency.md](references/concurrency.md) |
| Interface pollution, naming, generics | [references/interfaces.md](references/interfaces.md) |
| Resource leaks, defer misuse, slog, naming | [references/common-mistakes.md](references/common-mistakes.md) |

## Review Checklist

### Error Handling
- [ ] All errors checked (no `_ = err` without justifying comment)
- [ ] Errors wrapped with context (`fmt.Errorf("...: %w", err)`)
- [ ] `errors.Is`/`errors.As` used instead of string matching
- [ ] `errors.Join` used for aggregating multiple errors (Go 1.20+)
- [ ] Zero values returned alongside errors

### Concurrency
- [ ] No goroutine leaks (context cancellation or shutdown signal exists)
- [ ] Channels closed by sender only, exactly once
- [ ] Shared state protected by mutex or sync types
- [ ] WaitGroups used to wait for goroutine completion
- [ ] Context propagated through call chain
- [ ] Loop variable capture handled (pre-Go 1.22 codebases only)

### Interfaces and Types
- [ ] Interfaces defined by consumers, not producers
- [ ] Interface names follow `-er` convention
- [ ] Interfaces minimal (1-3 methods)
- [ ] Concrete types returned from constructors
- [ ] `any` preferred over `interface{}` (Go 1.18+)
- [ ] Generics used where appropriate instead of `any` or code generation

### Resources and Lifecycle
- [ ] Resources closed with `defer` immediately after creation
- [ ] HTTP response bodies always closed
- [ ] No `defer` in loops without closure wrapping
- [ ] `init()` functions avoided in favor of explicit initialization

### Naming and Style
- [ ] Exported names have doc comments
- [ ] No stuttering names (`user.UserService` → `user.Service`)
- [ ] No naked returns in functions > 5 lines
- [ ] Context passed as first parameter
- [ ] `slog` used over `log` for structured logging (Go 1.21+)

## Severity Calibration

### Critical (Block Merge)
- Unchecked errors on I/O, network, or database operations
- Goroutine leaks (no shutdown path)
- Race conditions on shared state (concurrent map access without sync)
- Unbounded resource accumulation (defer in loop, unclosed connections)

### Major (Should Fix)
- Errors returned without context (bare `return err`)
- Missing WaitGroup for spawned goroutines
- `panic` for recoverable errors
- Context not propagated to downstream calls

### Minor (Consider Fixing)
- `interface{}` instead of `any` in Go 1.18+ codebases
- Missing doc comments on exports
- Stuttering names
- Slice not preallocated when size is known

### Informational (Note Only)
- Suggestions to add generics where code generation exists
- Refactoring ideas for interface design
- Performance optimizations without measured impact

## When to Load References

- Reviewing error return patterns → error-handling.md
- Reviewing goroutines, channels, or sync types → concurrency.md
- Reviewing type definitions, interfaces, or generics → interfaces.md
- General review (resources, naming, init, performance) → common-mistakes.md

## Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

These are acceptable Go patterns — reporting them wastes developer time:

- **`_ = err` with reason comment** — Intentionally ignored errors with explanation
- **Empty interface / `any`** — For truly generic code or interop with untyped APIs
- **Naked returns in short functions** — Acceptable in functions < 5 lines with named returns
- **Channel without close** — When consumer stops via context cancellation, not channel close
- **Mutex protecting struct fields** — Even if accessed only via methods, this is correct encapsulation
- **`//nolint` directives with reason** — Acceptable when accompanied by explanation
- **Defer in loop*
release-tagSlash Command

tag and push a release after the release PR is merged

releaseSlash Command

create a release PR (auto-detects previous tag)

deepagents-architectureSkill

Guides architectural decisions for Deep Agents applications. Use when deciding between Deep Agents vs alternatives, choosing backend strategies, designing subagent systems, or selecting middleware approaches.

deepagents-code-reviewSkill

Reviews Deep Agents code for bugs, anti-patterns, and improvements. Use when reviewing code that uses create_deep_agent, backends, subagents, middleware, or human-in-the-loop patterns. Catches common configuration and usage mistakes.

deepagents-implementationSkill

Implements agents using Deep Agents. Use when building agents with create_deep_agent, configuring backends, defining subagents, adding middleware, or setting up human-in-the-loop workflows.

langgraph-architectureSkill

Guides architectural decisions for LangGraph applications. Use when deciding between LangGraph vs alternatives, choosing state management strategies, designing multi-agent systems, or selecting persistence and streaming approaches.

langgraph-code-reviewSkill

Reviews LangGraph code for bugs, anti-patterns, and improvements. Use when reviewing code that uses StateGraph, nodes, edges, checkpointing, or other LangGraph features. Catches common mistakes in state management, graph structure, and async patterns.

langgraph-implementationSkill

Implements stateful agent graphs using LangGraph. Use when building graphs, adding nodes/edges, defining state schemas, implementing checkpointing, handling interrupts, or creating multi-agent systems with LangGraph.