workflow
|
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace /tmp/workflow && cp -r /tmp/workflow/plugins/ai-agency/hyperflow/skills/workflow ~/.claude/skills/workflowSKILL.md
# Workflow Big-task path for work that is too large for normal turn-by-turn orchestration: system-wide changes, large migrations, repo-wide audits, high-confidence verification, and task prompts that explicitly ask for a workflow. - In Claude Code, use the host dynamic workflow runtime. - In Codex, run the portable workflow adapter with Codex subagents when exposed; otherwise run the same phases inline in the current thread. - In OpenCode, run the portable workflow adapter with Task/subagent dispatch when exposed; otherwise run the same phases inline in the current session. - In Grok, run the portable workflow adapter with `spawn_subagent` when enabled; otherwise run the same phases inline in the current session. - In Antigravity, Desktop/web bridge mode, or any host that cannot preserve the adapter phases, say so in one line and route to `/hyperflow:plan` with `chain-mode=auto`. Claude Code dynamic workflows require Claude Code v2.1.154 or later and can be disabled by `/config`, managed settings, `~/.claude/settings.json`, or `CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_WORKFLOWS=1`. When disabled, use the portable adapter if the host is Codex, OpenCode, or Grok; otherwise route to `/hyperflow:plan` with `chain-mode=auto`. ## Routing Rules - Run this skill in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and Grok. - Auto-route here when triage returns `flow=deep` or `flow=scientific`, `scope=system-wide`, or the user says `big task`, `large migration`, `repo-wide audit`, `run a workflow`, or `dynamic workflow`. - Do not route here for moderate multi-file work, routine bug fixes, or a task that needs user sign-off between implementation stages. Big-task workflow runs should not depend on arbitrary mid-run user input; split sign-off-heavy work into separate workflows or use `spec -> scope -> dispatch`. - Do not set `/effort ultracode` or `xhigh` automatically. The user can enable `/effort ultracode` manually for session-wide workflow selection. ## Provider Contracts ### Claude Code Native Workflow When this skill runs, ask the Claude Code workflow runtime to create a dynamic workflow for `$ARGUMENTS`. The generated workflow must preserve Hyperflow's doctrine inside the worker prompts and must include these phases: 1. Research and planning - Map affected files, dependency edges, tests, docs, and risk boundaries. - Read `.hyperflow/profile.md`, `.hyperflow/architecture.md`, `.hyperflow/conventions.md`, `.hyperflow/testing.md`, and `.hyperflow/memory/index.md` when present. - Produce a concise execution graph with parallelizable units and dependencies. 2. Parallel implementation or investigation - Fan out independent agents by subsystem or file family. - Keep each agent brief specific: objective, files in scope, constraints, acceptance criteria, and test expectations. - Use the lightest model/stage that can safely do the work when the runtime supports model routing. 3. Adversarial verification - Run independent verification agents against each implementation or finding. - For audits, verify each finding before reporting it. - For implementation, check cross-file integration, regression risk, security-sensitive paths, and missed tests. 4. Quality gates and repair loop - Run the project lint, typecheck, build, and relevant tests from `.hyperflow/testing.md` or detected package scripts. - Retry focused fixes only for verified failures. - Never use `--no-verify`; never force-push to main or master. 5. Final synthesis - Return one coordinated result with completed work, verification evidence, unresolved risks, changed files, and next actions. - For durable project learnings, identify what should be appended to `.hyperflow/memory/`, but do not invent memory entries unrelated to the run. ### Codex Portable Workflow Adapter Codex does not provide Claude Code's dynamic workflow runtime. Treat `/hyperflow:workflow` as a custom Hyperflow workflow envelope around Codex subagents and inline fallback: 1. Research and planning - Read the same `.hyperflow/` cache files listed above when present. - Write or update `.hyperflow/tasks/<slug>.md` for implementation or audit work that needs durable progress tracking. - Build an execution graph with parallelizable units, dependencies, expected commits, and verification commands. 2. Parallel implementation or investigation - If Codex subagent tools are exposed, dispatch independent searcher/worker/writer units together and collect their results before review. - Map implementation and writing tasks to worker subagents; map codebase research to explorer/search subagents. - If subagents are unavailable, run each unit inline with explicit worker and reviewer labels. 3. Adversarial verification - Run a separate verification pass for each completed unit before reporting it. - Use Codex thinking defaults for verification and final integration review. 4. Quality gates and commits - Run the detected lint, typecheck, build, and relevant tests. - Commit each accepted unit separately using conventional commits. - Never use `--no-verify`; never request `xhigh`. 5. Final synthesis - Return changed files, verification evidence, unresolved risks, and next actions. ### OpenCode Portable Workflow Adapter OpenCode does not provide Claude Code's dynamic workflow runtime. Treat `/hyperflow:workflow` as a custom Hyperflow workflow envelope around OpenCode's task/subagent facilities and inline fallback: 1. Research and planning - Read the same `.hyperflow/` cache files listed above when present. - Write or update `.hyperflow/tasks/<slug>.md` for implementation or audit work that needs durable progress tracking. - Build an execution graph with parallelizable units, dependencies, expected commits, and verification commands. 2. Parallel implementation or investigation - If OpenCode exposes Task/subagent dispatch, send independent implementation or investigation units through that path. - Keep each subtask bounded
|
Engineering lead — hand Apex any task and it routes internally. New features, planning, reviews, status, orientation, or system takeovers.
Plan and scope a project — discovery, challenge assumptions, present S/M/L options with token and cost estimates. Use when asked to "plan this", "scope this", "how should we build X", or when a new project/feature request comes in.
Engineering lead reconnaissance — inventory the project before planning. Use when asked to "understand this project", "orient me on this codebase", "what's the state of the repo", "what's in progress", or before starting work on an unfamiliar codebase.
Cross-cutting review of recent work — catches gaps between specialists. Use when asked to "review what we built", "check the work", "pre-launch review", or after completing a significant chunk of work.
CTO-level project status from git and codebase state. Use when asked "where are we", "project status", "what's done", or at the start of a work session.
System takeover — take ownership of an existing codebase or inherited system. Use when "we acquired this", "previous team left", "take over this system", "inherited this codebase".
Knowledge engineer — architecture docs, ADRs, diagrams, changelogs, onboarding, and reports.