Skip to main content
ClaudeWave
Skill963 estrellas del repoactualizado 4d ago

cs-escalation-brief

# cs-escalation-brief This Claude Code skill generates structured escalation briefs for at-risk customer accounts, organizing critical information into account context, timeline, root cause analysis, business impact, and actionable resolution plans. Use it when customers threaten churn, P1 issues require executive attention, accounts escalate internally, or when preparing save plays for retention efforts.

Instalar en Claude Code
Copiar
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills /tmp/cs-escalation-brief && cp -r /tmp/cs-escalation-brief/plugins/pm-cs/skills/cs-escalation-brief ~/.claude/skills/cs-escalation-brief
Después abre una sesión nueva de Claude Code; el skill carga automáticamente.

SKILL.md

# Customer Escalation Brief Skill

Produce a clear, concise escalation brief that gives internal stakeholders — VP CS, CCO, product leadership, or the CEO — everything they need to understand the situation, make decisions, and act fast.

A good escalation brief is not a complaint. It is a professional document that states the facts, assigns accountability honestly, and proposes a specific resolution plan.

## Required Inputs

Ask for these if not already provided:
- **Account name**, tier, and ARR
- **CSM name** and account owner
- **Nature of the escalation** — what happened, what the customer is saying
- **Timeline** of events leading to escalation
- **Customer contact** who escalated (name, role, influence level)
- **What the customer wants** — their stated ask
- **What we believe the root cause is**
- **What has already been done** to address the situation
- **Renewal date** and current renewal risk assessment

## Escalation Levels

Calibrate urgency and audience based on escalation level:

| Level | Trigger | Audience | Response time |
|---|---|---|---|
| L1 — Account Risk | Customer expressing dissatisfaction; renewal at risk | CSM + CS Manager | 24 hours |
| L2 — Executive Escalation | Customer escalated to their exec; requesting vendor exec involvement | VP CS + Account Exec | 4 hours |
| L3 — Churn Risk | Customer has issued notice or is in active churn conversation | CCO / CEO + Revenue leadership | 1 hour |
| L4 — Public Risk | Customer threatening public escalation, legal, or press | CCO / Legal / Comms | Immediate |

## Output Format

---

# Escalation Brief: [Account Name]

**Escalation level:** L[1/2/3/4] — [Label]
**Date raised:** [Date]
**Raised by:** [CSM name]
**Escalation owner:** [Name of exec or senior stakeholder now leading response]

---

## Account at a Glance

| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| ARR | £/$/€[X] |
| Tier | Enterprise / Mid-Market / SMB |
| Customer since | [Date] |
| Renewal date | [Date] — [N] days away |
| Renewal risk (pre-escalation) | Green / Amber / Red |
| Renewal risk (current) | Green / Amber / Red |
| Customer contact who escalated | [Name, role, seniority] |
| Executive sponsor (customer) | [Name, role — active / passive / vacant] |
| Executive sponsor (vendor) | [Name, role] |

---

## What Happened — Summary

[3–5 sentences. State the facts plainly. What the customer experienced, how they reacted, and how we learned about the escalation. No editorialising. No blame.]

---

## Timeline

List in chronological order. Each entry: `[Date / time] — [What happened. Who did what.]`

Include:
- When the original issue or trigger event occurred
- When the customer first raised concerns (informally)
- When it escalated (formal escalation or exec involvement)
- Actions taken since escalation

---

## Root Cause

**Primary cause:** [One clear sentence. What specifically went wrong.]

**Contributing factors:**
- [Factor 1 — be honest about internal failures as well as external ones]
- [Factor 2]

**Is this a systemic issue or isolated?**
[ ] Isolated to this account
[ ] Pattern seen in other accounts — details: [_______]
[ ] Product or process gap that needs fixing

---

## Customer's Stated Position

**What the customer says happened:** [Their version of events — fair and unfiltered]

**What they are asking for:** [Their explicit ask — compensation, fix by date, exec call, SLA credit, exit clause]

**Sentiment of escalating contact:** [Frustrated but constructive / Angry / Seeking exit / Unknown]

**Risk of public escalation:** Low / Medium / High — [evidence if Medium or High]

---

## Business Impact

| Impact type | Detail |
|---|---|
| ARR at risk | £/$/€[X] |
| Potential churn probability | [X]% |
| Reputational risk | Low / Medium / High |
| Reference / case study status | [Was a reference — now at risk / Not a reference] |
| Expansion pipeline at risk | £/$/€[X] |

---

## What Has Been Done So Far

1. [Action taken — by whom — date — outcome]
2. [Action taken — by whom — date — outcome]
3. [Action taken — by whom — date — outcome]

**Has a formal apology or acknowledgement been issued?** Yes / No

---

## Proposed Resolution Plan

**Immediate actions (next 24–48 hours):**

| Action | Owner | By when |
|---|---|---|
| [Action] | [Name] | [Date] |
| [Action] | [Name] | [Date] |

**Medium-term actions (next 2–4 weeks):**

| Action | Owner | By when |
|---|---|---|
| [Action] | [Name] | [Date] |

**What we are NOT offering:** [Be explicit about what is not on the table — avoids misaligned expectations]

**Success criteria:** [How will we know the escalation is resolved? What does the customer need to confirm they are satisfied?]

---

## Decision Required from Escalation Owner

[State clearly what decision or resource the escalation owner needs to provide. Be specific — do not make them ask. E.g.: "We need approval to offer a 20% service credit for Q2" or "We need an exec call with [name] within 48 hours."]

---

## Communication Plan

| Audience | Message | Channel | Owner | By when |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Escalating customer contact | [Summary of message] | Email / Call | [Name] | [Date] |
| Customer exec sponsor | [Summary] | Call | [Name] | [Date] |
| Internal CS team | [Summary] | Slack / Meeting | CS Manager | [Date] |

---

## Quality Checks

- [ ] Root cause is specific — not "communication breakdown" or "product gap" without detail
- [ ] Customer's position is stated fairly — not minimised or dismissed
- [ ] A clear decision is requested from the escalation owner — brief does not end with "what do you think?"
- [ ] ARR at risk is quantified
- [ ] Communication plan has owners and dates — not "TBD"
- [ ] Language is professional and blameless toward individuals

## Anti-Patterns

- [ ] Do not assign blame to individuals — focus on system failures and process gaps
- [ ] Do not downplay ARR at risk or describe churn risk vaguely without a number
- [ ] Do not leave resolution plan ownership as "TBD" or unassigned
- [ ] Do not write the bri
ai-ethics-reviewSkill

Conduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when preparing to deploy an AI system, assessing algorithmic risk, auditing a model for bias, or producing a responsible AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety, accountability, and societal impact with a risk tier score, pre-deployment checklist, and prioritised mitigations.

ai-product-canvasSkill

Structure AI and ML product decisions with the rigour of any product decision. Use when building AI-powered features, evaluating LLM integrations, designing AI products, or assessing AI readiness. Produces a complete AI product canvas covering problem definition, model approach, data requirements, evaluation framework, UX design, responsible AI checklist, and launch monitoring plan.

design-handoff-briefSkill

Transform feature briefs into structured design briefs that give designers the context they need before opening Figma. Use when asked to write a design brief, create a design handoff, brief a designer on a new feature, or translate a PRD into design requirements. Produces a brief with user goal, emotional context, success criteria, constraints, edge cases, and out-of-scope boundaries.

experiment-designerSkill

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests and interpret experiment results. Use when asked to design an experiment, run an A/B test, calculate sample size, interpret test results, or assess whether an experiment was successful. Produces a complete experiment design with hypothesis, sample size, run time, success criteria, and risk flags — or a results interpretation with ship/iterate/kill recommendation.

multi-source-signal-synthesiserSkill

Synthesises user signals from multiple research sources into a unified, weighted insight brief. Use when you have data from interviews, support tickets, NPS verbatims, app reviews, or sales calls and need to reconcile contradictions, surface the underlying need behind requests, or answer 'what are users really telling us'. Produces ranked insights with confidence ratings, source weighting rationale, divergent signal analysis by user segment, and a research gap identification section.

data-analysis-standardSkill

Structure a product data analysis, metric deep-dive, funnel analysis, or cohort study. Use when asked to analyse product metrics, investigate a drop in conversion, explain a data change to stakeholders, or find the root cause of a metric movement. Produces a structured analysis with question, root cause, confidence level, and recommended action.

product-health-analysisSkill

Interpret product metrics against goals and surface actionable signals. Use when asked to analyse product health, review key metrics, investigate a performance issue, produce a health report, or assess product-market fit signals. Produces a structured health report with RAG status, trend analysis, root cause hypotheses, and prioritised actions.

retention-analysisSkill

Structure a retention analysis, churn investigation, or engagement deep-dive for any product team. Use when asked to analyse user retention, investigate churn, measure DAU/MAU, or build a retention improvement plan. Produces a retention snapshot with root cause hypotheses, aha-moment correlation, and prioritised interventions.