Evidence-first Android and iOS security audits with CLI, TUI, MCP, public vulnerability intelligence, and OWASP-aligned evidence.
- ✓Open-source license (MIT)
- ✓Actively maintained (<30d)
- ✓Clear description
- ✓Topics declared
- ✓Documented (README)
claude mcp add apsa -- uvx apsa{
"mcpServers": {
"apsa": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["apsa"]
}
}
}MCP Servers overview
# APSA **Evidence-first security audits for Android and iOS.** [English](https://github.com/ictechgy/apsa/blob/main/README.md) · [한국어](https://github.com/ictechgy/apsa/blob/main/README.ko.md) This English README is the source of truth. The Korean README follows it. <!-- mcp-name: io.github.ictechgy/apsa --> APSA helps developers and security teams audit their own mobile apps. It inspects source code and APK/AAB/IPA builds, correlates public vulnerability information, and keeps evidence, coverage, and report history together. Use the CLI, terminal UI, or the same audit engine through MCP and reusable skills. Pronounced **“ap-sah”**; Korean name **앱사**. The name connects “app + audit” with **App Security Audit**. APSA combines the earlier Quaygate lint engine and Mobile Audit workflows in one package. APSA 1.1 adds bounded model report pages, portable approved baselines, exported policy decisions, and explicit source module/configuration selection. See [model and team workflows](docs/MODEL_WORKFLOWS.md) for the contract and [release sequence](docs/ROADMAP.md) for later analysis milestones. Mixed unsupported source languages and truncated pattern results are incomplete. Declared Gradle versions remain candidates until resolved-build evidence is supplied. OS-CVE correlation reports a bounded recent window, so feed freshness alone cannot satisfy historical coverage. APSA 1.2 adds AAB base-manifest/module DEX analysis, embedded IPA Mach-O metadata, bounded Objective-C `.m` candidates and parser OS isolation that is on by default where it can start. Every AAB audit stays partial, and embedded IPA metadata does not authenticate signatures. See [analysis scope and limits](https://github.com/ictechgy/apsa/blob/main/docs/NEXT_ANALYSIS.md) and the [independent holdout](https://github.com/ictechgy/apsa/blob/main/benchmarks/NEXT_RESULTS.md). **Upgrading from 1.1.** With the default `APSA_PARSER_SANDBOX=auto`, the parser runs under macOS Seatbelt or Linux bubblewrap after an input-free activation probe succeeds. Without a backend, the report records `parser_isolation.state: unavailable` and parses with resource limits only. If the backend is present but cannot start (for example inside another sandbox or with blocked user namespaces), the report also records the attempted backend and probe reason and adds an inventory warning. `required` refuses such audits; `off` skips the backend. A parser failure after isolation has started aborts the audit without an unsandboxed retry. Dependencies declared only in a Gradle version catalog no longer receive CVE matches until build usage or resolved versions are supplied. New rules (`AST-CRYPTO-ECB`, `AST-CRYPTO-WEAK-HASH`, `AST-SQL-CONCAT`, `OBJC-CRYPTO-WEAK-HASH`, `OBJC-WEBVIEW-UNTRUSTED-REQUEST`) can add findings relative to existing 1.1 baselines. APSA 1.3 links Gradle version-catalog aliases to the shipped dependency configurations that use them and reads application-module `gradle.lockfile` coordinates as resolved versions. It also decodes AAB feature-module manifests, recomputes Mach-O CodeDirectory page and entitlement hashes without authenticating the signature, adapts more Swift and Objective-C syntax, and can backfill an explicit range of Android security bulletins with SoC vendor and vendor patch-level context. See the [dependency evidence results](https://github.com/ictechgy/apsa/blob/main/benchmarks/DEPENDENCY_RESULTS.md), the [independent source pairs](https://github.com/ictechgy/apsa/blob/main/benchmarks/FPFN_RESULTS.md) and [analysis scope and limits](https://github.com/ictechgy/apsa/blob/main/docs/NEXT_ANALYSIS.md). **Upgrading from 1.2.** - Catalog aliases referenced from shipped configurations become `declared` candidates and can receive CVE matches again; unreferenced, test-only and build-tooling aliases stay unresolved. Application-module lockfile coordinates are exact, so their matches are `version-affected`, and the default policy fails on high and critical ones; other modules' lockfile coordinates stay `declared` candidates. A declared candidate that every shipping application resolved is superseded and leaves CVE correlation. Partial inputs keep every candidate, and with unparsed project references only an application's own declarations can be superseded. - Lockfile assumptions: APSA does not check that dependency locking is enabled or that the lockfile is current, and it merges the release runtime classpaths of every application module (flavors and wear, TV or automotive apps). `--source-module` scans only that module's directory, so a root version catalog and library-module declarations outside it are not read. - Baselines and waivers: a lockfile-resolved finding has a new location (`gradle.lockfile`) and status, so `only_new` treats it as new and waivers for the old finding ID no longer match. Re-approve baselines after upgrading. - `--online` sends catalog aliases used in shipped configurations and the release-runtime lockfile coordinates of every module, transitive ones and private group IDs included, to OSV; there is no exclusion list. One run queries at most 100 packages: those without an OSV result from the last day first, and among them build-file declarations before lockfile coordinates in lockfile order. Measured application lockfiles hold 179–412 shipped coordinates, so a single run leaves the rest `not-run`: a required `DEPENDENCY-CVE` rule cannot pass, the online audit is incomplete and the default `fail_on_partial` policy exits 3. Repeated runs within a day advance through the remainder, and a package with an OSV result from the last day counts as checked. Unresolved catalog aliases and ecosystems OSV does not support are reported as online errors on every run, so they keep the online audit incomplete however many runs follow. - IPA reports gain `BINARY-IOS-CODE-INTEGRITY`. Consistent hashes do not prove authenticity, because a modified binary that was re-signed is consistent. A mismatch adds a warning, not a finding; App Store encrypted and unsigned executables stay `not-run`. - `intel sync` refreshes only the recent Android bulletin window; use `intel backfill` for older months. Records cached by 1.2 derive their vendor scope from the component name; entries outside chipset and kernel sections use the platform patch level only. AAB feature-module installation stays unknown. - Adapted Swift and Objective-C files stay partial, and an Objective-C function overlapping a normalized preprocessor conditional is skipped as uncertain. Unmodified 1.2 skills upgrade with `apsa skill install`. APSA 1.4 is easier to put in front of developers and coding agents. A GitHub Action uploads SARIF to code scanning with stable fingerprints, security severity, MASWE tags and evidence status; every report carries an [OWASP MASWE v1.0](https://mas.owasp.org/MASWE/) coverage matrix that names the weaknesses APSA did not assess; and the MCP server is packaged for the MCP Registry and as a Claude Code plugin, with a documented [MCP security model](https://github.com/ictechgy/apsa/blob/main/docs/MCP_SECURITY.md). **Upgrading from 1.3.** - SARIF exports now list a descriptor for every rule with results (help, `security-severity`, precision, MASVS/MASWE tags), add `partialFingerprints` from the finding identity, and report not-run and partial coverage as tool execution notifications. Candidate findings are `warning` rather than `error` and their rules are tagged `candidate`. `--sarif-root` makes locations repository-relative; URIs are percent-encoded, and APK/AAB/IPA members and files outside the target appear as logical locations on the target. Code scanning may therefore show re-keyed alerts once. - New source checks (exported components, backup, `targetSdk`, privacy manifests, ATS exceptions, hard-coded secrets, insecure randomness, trust-all TLS, external storage, Java deserialization, more SQL sinks, mutable `PendingIntent`) add findings and coverage entries. A policy with `required_rules` or a severity gate can fail where 1.3 passed; review the first 1.4 report before tightening gates. - Rule metadata gains MASWE v1.0 identifiers; model context and `capabilities` gain a `maswe` section, and Markdown reports a MASWE coverage table. Reports derived by `reports ingest` add `external_inputs` and findings with `origin: external`; existing fields keep their meaning. - The MCP server adds `verify_finding`, `specs_validate`, `reports_ingest_sarif`, `reports_checklist` and `reports_history`. `tool_manifest_sha256` now covers a normalized APSA-owned surface, so its value changes; update any pinned hash. Unmodified 1.3 skills upgrade with `apsa skill install`. APSA 1.5 widens what a source scan looks for. New checks cover the OWASP MASWE weaknesses behind most MASTG demo misses: broken ciphers and implicit ECB, key material and IVs built from constants, short (512–1536-bit) RSA, DSA and DH key sizes and CryptoKit `Insecure` digests; biometric results not bound to a key, device-credential fallback and keys that survive new enrollment; TLS below 1.2, iOS connections outside App Transport Security, and user CAs or cleartext in the network security configuration; unverified App Links, intent redirection and implicit internal Intents; path traversal and keyed unarchiving without secure coding; and Safe Browsing turned off, UIWebView and WKWebView file access. On a blind holdout of 24 public vulnerable/fixed pairs labeled by MASWE weakness, APSA 1.5.0 found 7 of the 21 scored in-scope pairs at the labeled lines (Wilson 95% 17–55%). Two of the seven come from rules new in 1.5 and five from rules 1.4 already had; the fixed-side FP upper bound is 4 of 21, and a 22nd in-scope pair failed to scan. See the [blind pair results](https://github.com/ictechgy/apsa/blob/main/benchmarks/BLIND_PAIRS_RESULTS.md) and [analysis scope and limits](https://github.com/ictechgy/apsa/blo
What people ask about apsa
What is ictechgy/apsa?
+
ictechgy/apsa is mcp servers for the Claude AI ecosystem. Evidence-first Android and iOS security audits with CLI, TUI, MCP, public vulnerability intelligence, and OWASP-aligned evidence. It has 0 GitHub stars and its last recorded update is dated 2026-10-11.
How do I install apsa?
+
You can install apsa by cloning the repository (https://github.com/ictechgy/apsa) or following the README instructions on GitHub. ClaudeWave also provides quick install blocks on this page.
Is ictechgy/apsa safe to use?
+
Our security agent has analyzed ictechgy/apsa and assigned a Trust Score of 95/100 (tier: Verified). See the full breakdown of passed checks and flags on this page.
Who maintains ictechgy/apsa?
+
ictechgy/apsa is maintained by ictechgy. The last recorded GitHub activity is dated 2026-10-11, with 0 open issues.
Are there alternatives to apsa?
+
Yes. On ClaudeWave you can browse similar mcp servers at /categories/mcp, sorted by popularity or recent activity.
Deploy apsa to your cloud
Ship this repo to production in minutes. Each platform spins up its own environment with editable env vars.
Maintain this repo? Add a badge to your README
Drop the badge into your GitHub README to show it's tracked on ClaudeWave. Each badge links back to this page and reflects the live Trust Score.
[](https://claudewave.com/repo/ictechgy-apsa)<a href="https://claudewave.com/repo/ictechgy-apsa"><img src="https://claudewave.com/api/badge/ictechgy-apsa" alt="Featured on ClaudeWave: ictechgy/apsa" width="320" height="64" /></a>More MCP Servers
Fair-code workflow automation platform with native AI capabilities. Combine visual building with custom code, self-host or cloud, 400+ integrations.
User-friendly AI Interface (Supports Ollama, OpenAI API, ...)
An open-source AI agent that brings the power of Gemini directly into your terminal.
Real-time global intelligence dashboard. AI-powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface
🕷️ An adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full-scale crawl! Don't be shy, join here: https://discord.gg/EMgGbDceNQ and follow here for daily tips and tricks: https://x.com/Scrapling_dev
The fastest path to AI-powered full stack observability, even for lean teams.