US federal agency procurement FORECASTS — what an agency says it intends to
- ✓Open-source license (MIT)
- ✓Actively maintained (<30d)
- ✓Clear description
- ✓Topics declared
- ✓Documented (README)
claude mcp add mcp-acquisition-forecasts -- npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-acquisition-forecasts{
"mcpServers": {
"mcp-acquisition-forecasts": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@pipeworx/mcp-acquisition-forecasts"]
}
}
}MCP Servers overview
# acquisition-forecasts
US federal agency **procurement forecasts** — what an agency has published its
intention to buy, months to years before any solicitation exists. Keyless.
Part of [Pipeworx](https://pipeworx.io) — an MCP gateway connecting AI agents to 1558+ live data sources.
This is the forward-looking surface. `usaspending` is money already obligated;
`govcon-intel` scans SAM for solicitations already open. A forecast is the only
one that answers *"should I be staffing for this"* rather than *"did I miss it"*.
## Tools
- `forecast_search(keyword?, agency?, sub_agency?, naics?, set_aside?, fiscal_year?, min_value?, limit?)`
- `forecast_detail(forecast_id, agency?)` — full narrative, PoP, contacts
- `forecast_agencies()` — what is wired, and the verdict for everything that isn't
## Coverage is one agency, and that is the finding
Agencies are required to publish forecasts and acquisition.gov indexes 22 of
them. I probed **every one** on 2026-08-29. Exactly **one** publishes machine-
readable data:
| Verdict | Count | Agencies |
|---|---|---|
| **JSON API** | **1** | **DHS** (apfs-cloud.dhs.gov, 847 rows) |
| HTML, no data file | 15 | Agriculture, Education, Energy, Justice, Labor, State, Interior, Treasury, Transportation, VA, GSA, NASA, NSF, SSA, DHS's own landing page |
| PDF only | 4 | **DoD**, HUD, NRC, OPM |
| Blocks automated clients (403) | 2 | USAID, Commerce |
| Unreachable (timeout) | 1 | HHS |
PDF forecasts are **deliberately not OCR-ed**. A parsed number that is wrong is
worse than no number, and these are dollar values people plan against.
Because of that, `forecast_agencies()` ships as a first-class tool and
`agencies_covered` + `coverage_note` ride on every search response. A pack named
for federal forecasts that quietly covered one agency would answer *"nothing
planned"* for 21 agencies it never checked — the absence-of-data-vs-absence-of-
the-thing failure, which is the one this catalog keeps re-learning.
Adding an agency is a config entry in `AGENCIES[]` plus a field map.
## Traps
**The APFS API ignores every query parameter.** `?naics=5415`,
`?organization=CBP` and `?zzznonsense=x` all return the identical 847 rows with
the identical first id. There is no server-side filtering, so the pack fetches
the whole file (~2 MB, cached 15 min) and filters in memory. Anyone
"optimising" this by pushing filters upstream gets a result that looks filtered
and is not.
**`small_business_set_aside` and `small_business_program` are different fields.**
The first is a **boolean** (true/false/null), the second is the program **name**
(`SB`, `8(a)`, `HUBZone`, `WOSB`, `SDVOSB`, `AbilityOne`, `None`, `TBD`).
Coalescing the boolean first turns 350 of 847 rows into the literal string
`"true"` and costs them their program name — and makes `set_aside="8(a)"` return
**27 rows instead of 71**, because only rows whose boolean happened to be null
could still match. They are returned as `set_aside` (the name) and
`set_aside_applies` (the boolean, `null` meaning *the row does not say*).
**NAICS arrives as code *and* label in one string** — `"236220 - Commercial and
Institutional Building Construction"`. Matching a caller's `5415` against the raw
field would also hit any description containing those digits. The code is split
out and matched as a **prefix**, which is how NAICS hierarchy works: `5415`
covers `541511`, `541512`, … (175 rows vs 19 for the full code).
**Values are bands, not numbers** — `"$50M to $100M"`, `"Over $100M"`. The band
text is preserved verbatim *and* parsed to `low`/`high`. For an open-ended top
band `high` is **null**, not a large number, and `min_value` treats it as
unbounded — a fabricated ceiling would be sortable and wrong.
**`organization` is a sub-agency path**, not an agency: `CBP/OIT/LSS/ITB`. All
847 rows are DHS. `agency` and `sub_agency` are reported separately so
`agency="DHS"` means what a caller expects.
**Forecasts are revised.** `published_date`, `previously_published` and
`last_updated` say which version you are looking at; a withdrawn or awarded
requirement can drop out of the file entirely, which is why `forecast_detail`
says so rather than just reporting "not found".
## Quick Start
Add to your MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, etc.):
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"acquisition-forecasts": {
"url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/acquisition-forecasts/mcp"
}
}
}
```
### What this endpoint actually serves
`tools/list` at `https://gateway.pipeworx.io/acquisition-forecasts/mcp` returns the tools in the table
above **plus the shared Pipeworx meta-tools** — `ask_pipeworx`,
`discover_tools`, `search_within`, `remember`/`recall` and the rest of the
gateway-wide set. So the tool count you see is larger than this table: a
single-pack endpoint currently lists roughly 30 shared tools alongside the
pack's own. The connection's `initialize` response states its exact scope, and
is the authoritative answer for a given day.
This is deliberate, not multiplexing by accident. The meta-tools are what let a
scoped connection answer a question this pack does not cover — via
`ask_pipeworx`, which routes across the whole catalog — without you adding a
second MCP server. There is currently no way to mount a pack endpoint without
them; if the extra schemas cost you more context than the routing is worth,
connect to the full gateway once rather than to several pack endpoints.
Or connect to the full Pipeworx gateway to get every pack's tools listed
directly, instead of just this one's:
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"pipeworx": {
"url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/mcp"
}
}
}
```
Both URLs reach the same gateway and the same 1558+ data sources. The
only difference is which pack's tools are listed **directly**; `ask_pipeworx`
reaches all of them from either one.
## Standalone (no gateway account)
This package also runs as a local stdio MCP server — no Pipeworx account, no
gateway round-trip:
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"acquisition-forecasts": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@pipeworx/mcp-acquisition-forecasts"]
}
}
}
```
Or run it directly to confirm it starts:
```bash
npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-acquisition-forecasts
```
It speaks MCP over stdin/stdout and answers `initialize`/`tools/list`/`tools/call`
for **only** this pack's tools — none of the shared meta-tools the gateway
connection above adds. Same source, same tools, no ask_pipeworx routing.
## Using with ask_pipeworx
Instead of calling tools directly, you can ask questions in plain English —
this works on the pack endpoint above as well as on the full gateway:
```
ask_pipeworx({ question: "your question about Acquisition Forecasts data" })
```
The gateway picks the right tool and fills the arguments automatically.
## More
- [Docs and guides](https://pipeworx.io/docs)
- [pipeworx.io](https://pipeworx.io)
## License
MIT
What people ask about mcp-acquisition-forecasts
What is pipeworx-io/mcp-acquisition-forecasts?
+
pipeworx-io/mcp-acquisition-forecasts is mcp servers for the Claude AI ecosystem. US federal agency procurement FORECASTS — what an agency says it intends to It has 0 GitHub stars and its last recorded update is dated 2026-09-11.
How do I install mcp-acquisition-forecasts?
+
You can install mcp-acquisition-forecasts by cloning the repository (https://github.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-acquisition-forecasts) or following the README instructions on GitHub. ClaudeWave also provides quick install blocks on this page.
Is pipeworx-io/mcp-acquisition-forecasts safe to use?
+
Our security agent has analyzed pipeworx-io/mcp-acquisition-forecasts and assigned a Trust Score of 95/100 (tier: Verified). See the full breakdown of passed checks and flags on this page.
Who maintains pipeworx-io/mcp-acquisition-forecasts?
+
pipeworx-io/mcp-acquisition-forecasts is maintained by pipeworx-io. The last recorded GitHub activity is dated 2026-09-11, with 0 open issues.
Are there alternatives to mcp-acquisition-forecasts?
+
Yes. On ClaudeWave you can browse similar mcp servers at /categories/mcp, sorted by popularity or recent activity.
Deploy mcp-acquisition-forecasts to your cloud
Ship this repo to production in minutes. Each platform spins up its own environment with editable env vars.
Maintain this repo? Add a badge to your README
Drop the badge into your GitHub README to show it's tracked on ClaudeWave. Each badge links back to this page and reflects the live Trust Score.
[](https://claudewave.com/repo/pipeworx-io-mcp-acquisition-forecasts)<a href="https://claudewave.com/repo/pipeworx-io-mcp-acquisition-forecasts"><img src="https://claudewave.com/api/badge/pipeworx-io-mcp-acquisition-forecasts" alt="Featured on ClaudeWave: pipeworx-io/mcp-acquisition-forecasts" width="320" height="64" /></a>More MCP Servers
Fair-code workflow automation platform with native AI capabilities. Combine visual building with custom code, self-host or cloud, 400+ integrations.
User-friendly AI Interface (Supports Ollama, OpenAI API, ...)
An open-source AI agent that brings the power of Gemini directly into your terminal.
Real-time global intelligence dashboard. AI-powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface
The fastest path to AI-powered full stack observability, even for lean teams.
🕷️ An adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full-scale crawl!