full-output-enforcement
Full-Output Enforcement is a Claude Code skill that prevents incomplete outputs by enforcing complete code generation, eliminating placeholder patterns like ellipses or "TODO" comments, and implementing clean token-limit handling through pausable checkpoints. Use this when requesting exhaustive implementations, multi-file projects, or production-critical code where partial outputs would be non-functional.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/code-yeongyu/lazycodex /tmp/full-output-enforcement && cp -r /tmp/full-output-enforcement/plugins/omo/skills/frontend/references/design/output- ~/.claude/skills/full-output-enforcementoutput-skill.md
# Full-Output Enforcement ## Baseline Treat every task as production-critical. A partial output is a broken output. Do not optimize for brevity — optimize for completeness. If the user asks for a full file, deliver the full file. If the user asks for 5 components, deliver 5 components. No exceptions. ## Banned Output Patterns The following patterns are hard failures. Never produce them: **In code blocks:** `// ...`, `// rest of code`, `// implement here`, `// TODO`, `/* ... */`, `// similar to above`, `// continue pattern`, `// add more as needed`, bare `...` standing in for omitted code **In prose:** "Let me know if you want me to continue", "I can provide more details if needed", "for brevity", "the rest follows the same pattern", "similarly for the remaining", "and so on" (when replacing actual content), "I'll leave that as an exercise" **Structural shortcuts:** Outputting a skeleton when the request was for a full implementation. Showing the first and last section while skipping the middle. Replacing repeated logic with one example and a description. Describing what code should do instead of writing it. ## Execution Process 1. **Scope** — Read the full request. Count how many distinct deliverables are expected (files, functions, sections, answers). Lock that number. 2. **Build** — Generate every deliverable completely. No partial drafts, no "you can extend this later." 3. **Cross-check** — Before output, re-read the original request. Compare your deliverable count against the scope count. If anything is missing, add it before responding. ## Handling Long Outputs When a response approaches the token limit: - Do not compress remaining sections to squeeze them in. - Do not skip ahead to a conclusion. - Write at full quality up to a clean breakpoint (end of a function, end of a file, end of a section). - End with: ``` [PAUSED — X of Y complete. Send "continue" to resume from: next section name] ``` On "continue", pick up exactly where you stopped. No recap, no repetition. ## Quick Check Before finalizing any response, verify: - No banned patterns from the list above appear anywhere in the output - Every item the user requested is present and finished - Code blocks contain actual runnable code, not descriptions of what code would do - Nothing was shortened to save space
Use when Codex needs to understand or respond to automatic comment-checker feedback emitted after an edit-like PostToolUse hook.
Use when Codex needs language-server diagnostics, definitions, references, symbols, or rename safety checks in the current workspace.
Use when the user asks about Codex Rules behavior, injected project rules, supported rule file locations, matching, or environment configuration.
MUST USE for planning before coding: 5+ steps, ambiguous scope, multiple modules, architecture decisions, a vague 'just make it good / figure out what to build' brief, or any request to plan, interview, or break work down. Explore-first planning consultant (Prometheus) that grounds in the codebase, asks only the forks exploration cannot resolve - or researches them to best practice when the intent is fuzzy - waits for explicit approval, then writes ONE decision-complete work plan a worker executes with zero further interview. Triggers: ulw-plan, plan this, make a plan, plan before coding, interview me, break this down, start planning, plan mode, just make it good, figure out what to build.
Goal-like loop that uses ultrawork mode to decompose work into systematic, evidence-bound steps.
MUST USE for any real runtime debugging across ANY language or binary — crashes, silent failures, wrong responses, stuck processes, memory leaks, async misbehavior, unexplained timing, reverse engineering. Runs a hypothesis-driven loop: form ≥3 hypotheses, investigate in parallel, after 2 failed rounds spawn Oracles from orthogonal angles, confirm root cause, lock with a failing test, fix minimally, QA by actually USING the system, scrub artifacts. The actual HOW lives in `references/` — READ THEM. Triggers: 'debug this', 'why is X not working', 'hanging', 'attach a debugger', 'reverse engineer', 'pwndbg', 'gdb', 'lldb', 'node inspect', 'tsx debug', 'pdb', 'dlv', 'delve', 'rust-gdb', 'set a breakpoint', 'context window exploded', 'why is the response empty', 'attach the debugger', 'debug it', 'why is this happening', 'trace this bug', 'reproduce and fix', 'silent failure', 'HTTP 200 but empty', 'why did it stop', 'inspect the binary', 'reverse engineering', 'playwright'.
Designer-turned-developer who crafts stunning UI/UX even without design mockups
MUST USE whenever a task needs a commit or git-history investigation. Covers atomic commits, staging, commit-message style, rebase, squash, fixup/autosquash, blame, bisect, reflog, git log -S/-G, and questions like who wrote this or when was this added. Do not use for ordinary code edits unless the user asks for git work.