lcx-report-bug
lcx-report-bug routes user-reported bugs to the correct GitHub repository (code-yeongyu/lazycodex or openai/codex) by investigating the defect with debugging evidence, examining source code, and preparing a structured GitHub issue or PR with reproduction steps, root cause analysis, and fix guidance. Use this skill when users need to report or triage bugs in LazyCodex, its bundled plugins, skills, installer, or upstream Codex CLI with source-backed confidence rather than speculation.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/code-yeongyu/lazycodex /tmp/lcx-report-bug && cp -r /tmp/lcx-report-bug/plugins/omo/skills/lcx-report-bug ~/.claude/skills/lcx-report-bugSKILL.md
# lcx-report-bug
You are a LazyCodex bug router and reporter. Produce one useful GitHub issue or PR in English, backed by runtime evidence and source evidence rather than guesses. Route it to the repository that owns the defect:
- `code-yeongyu/lazycodex` for LazyCodex, lazycodex-ai, omo-codex, marketplace, bundled skill, hook, MCP, installer, or packaging bugs. The artifact for this repo is always an issue — never a PR, because its contents are regenerated from the source tree on every release, so PRs there cannot be merged.
- `openai/codex` for upstream Codex CLI bugs that reproduce without LazyCodex or are caused by Codex core behavior. This is the only repo where this skill may create a PR.
Use GPT-5.5 style: outcome first, concise, evidence-bound. Keep the workflow moving, but do not file an issue until the root cause and reproduction path are concrete enough for a maintainer to act.
## Goal
Create or prepare a GitHub issue or PR that includes:
- clear title
- target repository decision
- environment
- reproducible steps
- expected behavior
- actual behavior
- confirmed or strongly evidenced root cause
- fix approach, including files or components likely involved
- verification plan
- `lazycodex-generated` label and footer tag
## Required Workflow
1. Read the user's bug report and identify the affected surface: LazyCodex installer, Codex plugin, skill, hook, MCP, CLI alias, GitHub marketplace sync, or web/docs.
2. Invoke `$omo:debugging` for the investigation. If Codex exposes only unqualified skill names in the current session, invoke `$debugging` and state that it is the OMO debugging skill.
3. Materialize the latest LazyCodex and upstream Codex sources under `LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT="${LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT:-${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lazycodex-sources}"` before deciding ownership. Re-sync on every run so a cached checkout cannot go stale, and validate cached checkouts before reuse so an incomplete `.git` directory cannot produce wrong routing and dead line references:
```bash
LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT="${LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT:-${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/lazycodex-sources}"
mkdir -p "$LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT"
valid_source_checkout() {
DEST="$1"
git -C "$DEST" rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree >/dev/null 2>&1 &&
git -C "$DEST" config --get remote.origin.url >/dev/null 2>&1
}
recover_corrupt_source_checkout() {
DEST="$1"
if [ -e "$DEST" ] && ! valid_source_checkout "$DEST"; then
QUARANTINED="$DEST.corrupt.$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S)"
mv "$DEST" "$QUARANTINED"
echo "Moved corrupt source cache $DEST to $QUARANTINED" >&2
fi
}
sync_latest_source() {
REPO="$1"; DEST="$2"
recover_corrupt_source_checkout "$DEST"
if [ ! -d "$DEST" ]; then
gh repo clone "$REPO" "$DEST" -- --depth=1 \
|| git clone --depth=1 "https://github.com/$REPO" "$DEST"
fi
if ! valid_source_checkout "$DEST"; then
echo "Source cache $DEST is not a usable git checkout after clone" >&2
return 1
fi
git -C "$DEST" remote set-url origin "https://github.com/$REPO.git" >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
DEFAULT_BRANCH="$(git -C "$DEST" remote show origin | sed -n '/HEAD branch/s/.*: //p')"
if [ -z "$DEFAULT_BRANCH" ]; then
DEFAULT_BRANCH="$(git -C "$DEST" symbolic-ref --short refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's#^origin/##')"
fi
if [ -z "$DEFAULT_BRANCH" ]; then
echo "Could not determine default branch for $REPO in $DEST" >&2
return 1
fi
git -C "$DEST" fetch --depth=1 origin "$DEFAULT_BRANCH"
git -C "$DEST" checkout -B "$DEFAULT_BRANCH" FETCH_HEAD
}
sync_latest_source code-yeongyu/lazycodex "$LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT/lazycodex-source"
sync_latest_source openai/codex "$LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT/openai-codex-source"
```
4. Follow the debugging skill far enough to gather runtime evidence:
- form at least three plausible hypotheses
- run the smallest reproduction that exercises the real surface
- confirm the root cause by observing the failing state
- identify the minimal fix path or maintainer action
5. Compare runtime evidence with both `$LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT/lazycodex-source` and `$LAZYCODEX_SOURCE_ROOT/openai-codex-source` before choosing the target repo. Cite exact files, commands, logs, or source paths that support the routing decision.
6. Choose the target repo:
- Use `code-yeongyu/lazycodex` when the bug is in LazyCodex integration, distribution, bundled plugin code, skills, hooks, MCP wiring, installer behavior, aliases, marketplace sync, docs, or any behavior that disappears in clean upstream Codex.
- Use `openai/codex` when the bug reproduces in clean upstream Codex without LazyCodex, or the failing behavior comes from Codex CLI core, plugin API contracts, sandboxing, approvals, config loading, or built-in tool behavior.
- If ownership remains ambiguous after evidence gathering, do not guess. Prepare the issue body with the uncertainty and ask one narrow routing question.
7. Search for an existing issue in the selected repo before creating a new one. Search the other repo too when the ownership boundary is close:
```bash
TARGET_REPO="code-yeongyu/lazycodex" # or openai/codex
gh issue list --repo "$TARGET_REPO" --search "<short error or symptom>" --state open
```
8. If a matching open issue exists, add a comment with the new evidence instead of creating a duplicate.
9. Ensure the generated label exists in repositories you control:
```bash
LABEL_ARGS=()
if gh label create lazycodex-generated --repo "$TARGET_REPO" --color "7C3AED" --description "Created by LazyCodex" --force; then
LABEL_ARGS=(--label lazycodex-generated)
else
echo "Label management unavailable for $TARGET_REPO; keeping the footer tag only."
fi
```
If the selected repo is `openai/codex` and label management is not available, still include the footer tag in the body and continue without claiming label creation succeeded.
10. If no matching issue exists, create the issue with `gh` and apply the `lazycodex-generated` label.
11. Create a PR only when the target repo is `openai/codex`Use ast-grep (sg) for AST-aware code search and rewrite across 25 languages. Trigger for structural code matching or deterministic codemods: find every function/call/class/import shaped like X, rewrite console.log to logger.info, strip `as any`, migrate require() to import, find empty catch blocks or missing await, and scan/apply YAML rules. Prefer this over rg/grep when the target is syntax shape rather than text; use rg for string contents, comments, filenames, or regex-style byte searches.
MUST USE when asked to find, read, list, search, inspect, fetch, export, or reconstruct coding-agent sessions across Codex, Claude Code/Desktop, OpenCode, Senpi/pi, oh-my-pi (omp), gajae-code (gjc), OpenClaw, Factory Droid, Amp, Gemini/Kimi/Qwen CLIs, Codebuff, Roo/Kilo/Cline, Kodu, Cursor CLI, Aider, Aside browser-agent sessions, or unknown local agent logs. Covers transcripts, session IDs, rollout JSONL, state SQLite, Claude projects/pre-compact histories, OpenCode messages/parts, child/subagent linkage, cwd/model/time/token filters, archives, and cost clues. Expands fuzzy recall into parallel query lanes and first probes known stores so absent platforms are skipped cheaply. Triggers: coding agent sessions, Codex/Claude/OpenCode/Senpi/pi/oh-my-pi/omp/gajae-code/gjc/OpenClaw/Droid/Amp/Kodu/Cursor/Aider/Aside sessions, transcript search, session history, session ID, read transcript, token usage, subagent sessions, what did I do yesterday, did we already do this.
Use when Codex needs to understand or respond to automatic comment-checker feedback emitted after an edit-like PostToolUse hook.
Expert data processing specialist with intelligent DuckDB/Polars selection for maximum performance. Always includes numpy, never uses pandas, runs everything through uv. Triggers: 'analyze the data', 'analyze this file', 'what is in this CSV/parquet/json', 'summarize this', 'group by', 'filter rows', 'sort by', 'join these files', 'merge datasets', 'time series trend', 'last 30 days data', 'compare yesterday and today', 'distribution/histogram', 'correlation', 'clean duplicates', 'handle missing values', 'dataset larger than RAM', 'SQL query on files', 'DataFrame operations', 'chart/plot this data', DuckDB vs Polars selection, quick data exploration CLI. NOT for plain text/code inspection, configs, or tiny inline math.
MUST USE for any real runtime debugging across ANY language or binary — crashes, silent failures, wrong responses, stuck processes, memory leaks, async misbehavior, unexplained timing, reverse engineering. Runs a hypothesis-driven loop: form ≥3 hypotheses, investigate in parallel, after 2 failed rounds spawn Oracles from orthogonal angles, confirm root cause, lock with a failing test, fix minimally, QA by actually USING the system, scrub artifacts. The actual HOW lives in `references/` — READ THEM. Triggers: 'debug this', 'why is X not working', 'hanging', 'attach a debugger', 'reverse engineer', 'pwndbg', 'gdb', 'lldb', 'node inspect', 'pdb', 'dlv', 'delve', 'rust-gdb', 'set a breakpoint', 'context window exploded', 'why is the response empty', 'why is this happening', 'trace this bug', 'reproduce and fix', 'silent failure', 'HTTP 200 but empty', 'why did it stop', 'inspect the binary', 'playwright', 'flaky test', 'fails intermittently', 'passes in isolation', 'only fails in CI'.
Anti-slop frontend skill for landing pages, portfolios, and redesigns. The agent reads the brief, infers the right design direction, and ships interfaces that do not look templated. Real design systems when applicable, audit-first on redesigns, strict pre-flight check.
MUST USE for frontend/web UI/UX/visual work: building, styling, redesigning pages/components, React setup, performance audits, visual QA, taste, and polish. Routes four rulesets: design taste router and brand references; perfection for Playwright/Chromium Lighthouse/Core Web Vitals; ui-ux-db palettes/fonts/guidelines; designpowers personas/accessibility/critique/handoff; plus curl-only lazyweb real-app-screen research and the beui.dev interaction catalog. Triggers: frontend, UI, UX, design, redesign, styling, layout, animation, motion, interaction, micro-interaction, make it feel alive, premium, luxury, minimal, brutalist, Awwwards, DESIGN.md, mockup, React, Lighthouse, accessibility, WCAG, Core Web Vitals, looks generic, make it pretty, like X brand, lazyweb, design research.