management-deep-dive
Deep management assessment — the 'buying a stock is buying a person' layer. For a company or a named executive, evaluate integrity (promise-vs-delivery tracking, crisis behavior, stakeholder treatment), ability (strategic foresight, execution, capital-allocation record) and governance (equity structure, compensation, related-party deals). Outputs a weighted score across integrity / ability / capital-allocation / governance plus Duan Yongping's 3-question verdict ('would you hand this person your money for 10 years'). Use when standard research leaves management quality uncertain, or when management IS the investment thesis.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HKUDS/Vibe-Trading /tmp/management-deep-dive && cp -r /tmp/management-deep-dive/agent/src/skills/management-deep-dive ~/.claude/skills/management-deep-diveSKILL.md
# Management Deep Dive: Buying a Stock Is Buying a Person Deep management research on a company (or `person company`). > "Buying a stock is buying a person. Find someone you trust, then hold long-term." — Duan Yongping > > "To judge management, look at what they do when no one is watching." — Buffett ## Design Philosophy Most analysis stops at the surface: résumé, shareholding, compensation. But Buffett spends time talking with management, Li Lu says investing is fundamentally investing in people, Duan Yongping says buying a stock is buying a person. AI can't have dinner with management, but it can via public information: ① **track whether words match deeds** (promises vs delivery); ② **analyze the return of every major capital-allocation decision**; ③ **infer character from decisions made in hard times**; ④ **cross-check via employee / merchant / customer feedback**. Use when: standard research leaves management score uncertain (★★★ or below), or when management is the core investment logic. ## Step 1: Identify Key People Use `web_search` / `get_stock_profile` / `get_sec_filings`: | Role | Name | Tenure | Background | Shareholding/options | |------|------|--------|------------|----------------------| | CEO/Chairman | | | | | | CFO | | | | | | Founder (if not in role) | | | | | | Actual controller (if different from CEO) | | | | | | Other key executives | | | | | **Distinguish "who decides" from "whose name is on the title"** — some founders remain the soul even after stepping down. Then gather four data categories (sequentially via `web_search` + `get_stock_news` + `get_financial_statements` + `get_sec_filings`, or `run_swarm`): ① CEO public statements and prediction record; ② capital-allocation decisions (M&A / buybacks / dividends / new business); ③ governance and compensation; ④ side validation (employee / customer / industry reputation). ## Step 2: CEO Circle of Competence ### Strategic Foresight Use `web_search` to collect the CEO's public statements over the past 5 years (shareholder letters, calls, interviews, social media); extract their judgments: | Time | CEO's judgment/prediction | Actual outcome | Accuracy | |------|---------------------------|----------------|----------| | | "We believe market X will..." | X actually... | ✅/❌ | Key questions: Has the CEO made correct calls ahead of the market? Stayed calm when everyone was bullish? Is their industry understanding independent or following the crowd? ### Execution | Dimension | Assessment | Evidence | |-----------|-----------|----------| | Strategy-to-execution | Did they do what they said? | | | Organization | Can they attract and retain talent? | | | Crisis handling | How do they respond to difficulty? | | | Iteration speed | How fast do they correct mistakes? | | ## Step 3: Integrity Assessment (most important) > Buffett: "We look for three qualities: integrity, intelligence, and energy. Without the first, the other two will kill you." ### Promise-vs-Delivery Tracking Extract specific commitments from the past 3 years (calls, letters, interviews) via `get_sec_filings` / `web_search` / `get_stock_news`: | # | Time | Commitment | Occasion | Delivery | Rating | |---|------|-----------|----------|----------|--------| | 1 | | "X business profitable in 2025" | 2024 annual call | | ✅/⚠️/❌ | | Delivery rate | Rating | |:-------------:|--------| | >80% | Excellent — does what it says | | 60-80% | Acceptable — right direction, execution gaps | | 40-60% | Concerning — over-promises, under-delivers | | <40% | Serious problem — untrustworthy | ### Behavior in Hard Times Search for major crises (price crash, earnings miss, regulatory shock, competition); analyze management's response: proactive comms or hiding? Internal attribution or blaming external? Used the crisis to do the hard right thing or to pander short-term? ### Treatment of Stakeholders | Stakeholder | Attitude | Evidence | Rating | |-------------|----------|----------|--------| | Shareholders | Respect/ignore/exploit | | | | Employees | Treat well/exploit/ignore | | | | Customers/users | Customer-first/short-term extract | | | | Merchants/suppliers | Fair/extreme price pressure | | | | Regulator/society | Compliant/corner-cutting | | | ## Step 4: Capital Allocation Buffett's most-valued ability — **for every dollar earned, how much does management turn it into?** Search past 5 years of capital decisions (`web_search` / `get_financial_statements`); score each: **M&A record**: time / target / amount / strategic logic / after-the-fact return / score(1-5) **Buybacks** (use `financial_rigor` `command=verify_valuation` to check PE at buyback time vs now): time / amount / avg price / PE then / retrospective / score(1-5) **Dividends**: year / amount / payout ratio / vs FCF / sustainable **New business investment**: time / area / cumulative spend / status / return / score(1-5) ### Capital Allocation Score | Dimension | Score(1-5) | Notes | |-----------|:---------:|-------| | M&A discipline | | Right price? Integration? | | Buyback timing | | Buy low, stop high? | | Dividend rationality | | Payout vs FCF? | | New business | | Success rate? Stop-loss discipline? | | Cash management | | Reasonable reserves? Hoarding? | | **Overall** | | | ## Step 5: Governance ### Equity Structure | Item | Detail | Risk | |------|--------|------| | Dual-class / super-voting? | | | | Founder/controller stake? | | | | VIE structure? | | | | Independent directors truly independent? | | | | Recent major-holder changes? | | | ### Compensation | Executive | Total annual comp | % of net income | vs peers | Reasonable? | |-----------|-------------------|-----------------|----------|-------------| Is incentive aligned with long-term shareholders or encouraging short-term behavior? ### Related-Party Transactions | Related party | Transaction | Amount | Arm's length? | Risk | |---------------|------------|--------|---------------|------| ## Step 6: Side Validation A
Professional finance research toolkit — backtesting (10 engines + benchmark comparison panel), factor analysis, Alpha Zoo (462 pre-built alphas across qlib158/alpha101/gtja191/academic/fundamental), options pricing, 90 finance skills, 30 multi-agent swarm teams, Trade Journal analyzer, and Shadow Account (extract → backtest → render) across 25 market-data sources (tushare, yfinance, okx, binance, akshare, baostock, tencent, mootdx, ccxt, futu, mt5, tickerall, local, eastmoney, sina, stooq, yahoo, pykrx, india_broker, qveris, longbridge, plus optional-key finnhub/alphavantage/tiingo/fmp).
ADR/H-share/A-share cross-listing premium analysis — track pricing gaps between US-listed ADRs, HK-listed H-shares, and A-shares for arbitrage signals, dual-listing valuation, and delisting risk assessment.
AKShare financial data aggregator (18k+ stars). Free, no API key. Covers A-shares, US, HK, futures, macro, forex. Primary fallback for tushare and yfinance.
Browse and bench the bundled alpha zoos — prebuilt cross-sectional factor libraries (Kakushadze 101, GTJA 191, Qlib 158, Fama-French / Carhart). Use when the user asks "which alphas exist", wants metadata on a named alpha, or wants to run IC/IR on a whole zoo over a universe.
A 股 ST/*ST 风险预测框架 — 基于最新中报/三季报或业绩预告/快报,预测下一财年是否会因营收、利润、净资产、分红不达标而被风险警示,并将新浪监管处罚记录作为独立证据面纳入风险等级。仅适用于 A 股,不预测财务造假。
Asset allocation theory and optimizer usage — MPT / Black-Litterman / risk budgeting / all-weather strategy, including guides for 5 optimizers and rebalancing rules.
Diagnose failed or underperforming backtests, locate the root cause, and fix the issue
Behavioral finance applications: theories of overreaction and underreaction, behavioral explanations for momentum and reversal, investor sentiment cycles, cognitive-bias checklists, and debiasing quantitative strategies.