code-documenter
Expert documentation generator for coding projects. Analyzes codebases to
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/robertguss/claude-code-toolkit /tmp/code-documenter && cp -r /tmp/code-documenter/skills/code-documenter ~/.claude/skills/code-documenterSKILL.md
# Code Documenter Skill An intelligent documentation system that analyzes codebases and generates thorough, comprehensive documentation tailored to your project type and audience needs. ## Core Philosophy **Documentation serves readers, not authors.** Every decision about structure, depth, and content is evaluated from the reader's perspective: - Will this help them understand? - Will this help them succeed? - Will this answer their questions? - Does this earn its place? **Comprehensive without overwhelm.** Thorough coverage of what matters, ruthless cutting of what doesn't. The goal is complete, accurate, useful documentation—not exhaustive documentation of every line of code. **Documentation as code artifact.** Docs should be versioned, tested, and maintained with the same rigor as code. They're not afterthoughts; they're essential. ## When to Use This Skill **Primary use cases:** - After completing significant new work (epic, major feature, new app) - When shipping an open source project - When documentation has fallen out of sync with code - When onboarding requires better documentation - When setting up a new project properly **Not for:** - In-progress features (wait until stable) - Code comments or docstrings (this generates external docs) - API reference generation from code (use language-specific tools for that) ## Session Flow ### Mode Selection The skill operates in two modes: | Mode | When to Use | Behavior | | ---------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------- | | **Quick Mode** | Incremental updates after new features | Autonomous, fast, focused on what changed | | **Comprehensive Mode** | New projects, major overhauls, first-time setup | Collaborative, thorough, quality gates throughout | **The skill will ask:** "Quick update or comprehensive documentation?" ### Phase 1: Multi-Agent Project Analysis The skill deploys specialized analysis agents to understand your project: ``` Analysis Phase: ├─ Agent 1: Project Structure │ └─ Scanning file tree, identifying project type, tech stack ├─ Agent 2: Code Surface Analysis │ └─ Finding APIs, components, commands, exports ├─ Agent 3: Dependency Analysis │ └─ Reviewing packages, frameworks, key dependencies ├─ Agent 4: Git History Analysis │ └─ Analyzing commits since last doc update ├─ Agent 5: Existing Documentation Review │ └─ Reading current docs, assessing state └─ Synthesis: Generating documentation plan... ``` **Quick Mode:** Focused analysis on what changed since last update **Comprehensive Mode:** Full analysis of entire project Each agent reports findings in structured format. You see everything happening. ### Phase 2: Documentation State Assessment The skill compares code state vs. documentation state: **If manifest exists (`.doc-state.json`):** - Loads documentation state from last run - Compares current code vs. last documented state - Identifies what's changed (added/modified/removed) - Shows you the documentation debt **If no manifest:** - First time documenting this project - Will create fresh manifest after completion **Key metrics shown:** - **Health Score:** Current documentation health (0-100) - **Coverage:** What % of public surface is documented - **Freshness:** How current are docs vs. code - **Debt:** What needs attention (prioritized) ### Phase 3: Audience & Scope Discovery The skill asks: 1. **"Who needs these docs?"** - Developers only - Users only - Both developers and users 2. **"What depth of documentation?"** - **Standard:** Right-sized coverage (4,000-7,000 words) - **Deep:** Comprehensive with internals (8,000-12,000 words) **Quick Mode:** Uses stored preferences from manifest **Comprehensive Mode:** Asks explicitly, shows examples ### Phase 4: Documentation Boundaries The skill proposes what should be documented: ``` Based on my analysis of your Express + PostgreSQL API: PUBLIC SURFACE (Always Document) ├─ 12 API endpoints in /routes ├─ Database schema (3 tables) ├─ 14 environment variables └─ Authentication flow INTERNAL IMPLEMENTATION (Recommended for Deep) ├─ 6 middleware functions ├─ Error handling patterns └─ Database migration strategy INFRASTRUCTURE (Essential for all levels) ├─ Docker setup ├─ CI/CD pipeline └─ Deployment process EXCLUDED (Recommend skip) ├─ Test files (obvious from names) ├─ Build scripts (standard tooling) └─ Internal helpers (<10 lines each) Adjust these boundaries? [approve/modify] ``` You approve or adjust before documentation generation begins. ### Phase 5: Documentation Plan Presentation The skill presents a complete plan: ``` DOCUMENTATION PLAN Structure: └─ /docs ├─ developers/ │ ├─ api.md (API endpoint reference) │ ├─ architecture.md (System design + diagrams) │ ├─ contributing.md (How to contribute) │ ├─ deployment.md (Deploy & operate) │ ├─ troubleshooting.md (Common issues) │ ├─ examples/ (12 runnable examples) │ └─ adr/ (4 architecture decisions) ├─ users/ │ ├─ getting-started.md (Quick start guide) │ ├─ features.md (Feature overview) │ ├─ troubleshooting.md (User-facing issues) │ └─ examples/ (5 user examples) ├─ CHANGELOG.md (Documentation change log) └─ documentation-map.md (Navigation guide) Files to update: - README.md (complete rewrite, progressive disclosure) - docs/developers/api.md (2 new endpoints, 1 modified) - docs/CHANGELOG.md (new entry) Files to create: - docs/adr/004-caching-strategy.md (new decision) - docs/developers/examples/pagination.js (new example) Files to remove: - docs/developers/legacy-auth.md (endpoint removed) Estimated scope: ~5,200 words total Target health score: 92/100 Proceed? [yes/adjust scope/abort] ``` **Comprehensive Mode:** Review and approve before generation **Quick Mode:** Brief preview, option to
Guide for creating effective skills. This skill should be used when users want
This skill should be used when writing in the distinctive style of David Heinemeier Hansson (DHH). It applies when creating blog posts, technical articles, business content, manifestos, or any prose requiring a clear, punchy, opinionated style.
This skill should be used when reviewing or editing copy to ensure adherence to Every's style guide. It provides a systematic line-by-line review process for grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and style guide compliance.
This skill should be used when writing technical content in the style of Hunt/Thomas (The Pragmatic Programmer) and Joel Spolsky (Joel on Software). It applies when creating technical essays, documentation, tutorials, or explanatory content that needs to be clear, engaging, and actionable.
This skill should be used when extracting voice profiles from sample text, creating voice documentation, or matching a specific writing style. It applies when users provide sample text and want to capture the voice for future use.
This skill should be used when orchestrating complex writing workflows with multiple phases. It provides two-agent orchestration patterns, the two-gate content readiness assessment, 10 baseline writing strategies, 20+ situational strategies, and quality checkpoints. Inspired by the Spiral Writing System.
Collaborative brainstorming partner for multi-session ideation projects. Use