code-overview
The code-overview skill synthesizes contextual understanding of a code target by orchestrating discovery agents and architectural reviewers to produce a read-only orientation document. Use it to quickly understand unfamiliar codebases, pull requests, or code sections before deeper review or modification, particularly when navigating complex projects where initial context-mapping accelerates productive work.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/testdouble/han /tmp/code-overview && cp -r /tmp/code-overview/han-coding/skills/code-overview ~/.claude/skills/code-overviewSKILL.md
## Project Context
- git installed: !`which git`
- gh installed: !`which gh`
- CLAUDE.md: !`find . -maxdepth 1 -name "CLAUDE.md" -type f`
- project-discovery.md: !`find . -maxdepth 3 -name "project-discovery.md" -type f`
## Operating Principles
Read these before doing anything. They constrain every step below.
- **The skill orchestrates and synthesizes; the agents discover, then refine.** The skill resolves the target, classifies size, dispatches exploration, and writes the overview. `han-core:codebase-explorer` agents gather the surrounding code and context the synthesis draws on — they do not write the overview. After the draft is written, `han-core:information-architect` and `han-core:junior-developer` review it for progressive disclosure and readability; the skill applies their recommendations. The skill itself produces the grouping, the charts, the orientation, and the final rewrite.
- **Read-only, always.** The skill explains; it never edits the target. It writes only its own scratch overview file. BECAUSE the job is understanding, not modification — this keeps the skill safe to point at unfamiliar code.
- **No quality judgment, ever.** The overview raises no findings, severities, or recommended changes — including in the PR-mode "what to watch" section, which is navigational only. BECAUSE reviewing a PR's quality is `code-review`'s job; this skill only helps the operator understand the PR before they review it. Crossing this line collapses the boundary between the two skills.
- **No PR statistics, ever.** The overview never states lines changed, files changed, additions/deletions, commit counts, or any other diff-stat figure — not in the intro, not in a section, not anywhere. BECAUSE these numbers go stale the instant the PR is updated and add no understanding; describe what changed and why, never how big the diff is.
- **Ephemeral, not documentation.** The overview is written to a scratch file outside the repository and is never committed into the repository's documentation tree. BECAUSE durable feature and system docs are `project-documentation`'s job; this skill is an understand-now orientation aid.
- **Default to small.** Start size classification at small and escalate only when a higher-band signal is clearly present. BECAUSE under-dispatching is recoverable by re-running larger; over-dispatching burns tokens and dilutes the overview.
- **Minimal technical detail, scoped per section.** Keep the purpose, flow, and context sections at the level of what the code does and why. The where-to-start / what-to-watch handoff is the one exception — it must name concrete entry points or it is not actionable.
- **The output template lives at [references/overview-template.md](./references/overview-template.md).** Render that template; do not invent a structure inline.
# Produce a Code Overview
## Step 1: Resolve the Target and Select the Mode
**Bind `$size`.** If the user passed `small`, `medium`, or `large` as the first positional argument, bind `$size` to it. Anything else is part of the target, not a size; bind `$size` to the literal `none provided`.
**Note tool availability.** Read `git installed` and `gh installed` from Project Context. If `git installed` is empty, git is unavailable — see the degraded paths below.
**Resolve the target and mode by this fixed precedence**, so an ambiguous string never silently selects the wrong mode:
1. **An explicit pull request reference or URL** (e.g. `#82`, `https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/82`) → **PR mode** against that pull request. Requires `gh`; if `gh installed` is empty, tell the user `gh` is needed to read a named pull request and offer code mode against a local target instead.
2. **An existing file or directory path** (confirm it resolves with Glob or find) → **code mode** on that path.
3. **A symbol** (a function, class, type, or other named code entity) → **code mode** on that symbol. Resolve it with Grep across the repository.
4. **No target string given** → **PR mode** against the current branch's changes (the local diff). This requires git, not a remote pull request.
**Handle the unresolvable and empty cases** (state the problem plainly and stop; never guess):
- A path or symbol that resolves to nothing, or a symbol ambiguous across several definitions → report what could not be resolved and ask the user to disambiguate.
- No target given and the working tree is clean with no branch changes → ask the user for a code target rather than producing an empty overview.
- No target given and git is unavailable → tell the user PR mode and the bare-invocation default need git to read changes, and ask for a named code target (code mode still runs without git).
**Resolve project context.** If `CLAUDE.md` is present, read its `## Project Discovery` section for conventions; fall back to `project-discovery.md`. These resolve language and framework questions so the explorers infer less. If neither exists, note that surrounding-code inference applies and pass that into the briefs.
## Step 2: Classify Size and Announce
**Classify the target's size. Default to small**; escalate only on a clear signal, and stay at the smaller band when a signal is borderline.
- **Small** *(default)* — a single file, a single symbol, or a small change set (a few files in one subsystem).
- **Medium** — a directory or module, or a moderate change set (several files across one or two adjacent subsystems).
- **Large** — multiple subsystems, or a large change set (many files across several subsystems).
**Apply the size override.** If `$size` is not `none provided`, use it as the band and skip the signal-based classification; a conversational override ("give me a large overview") is equivalent.
**Announce the chosen mode and size in one line before dispatching any exploration** — for example, `Code mode, size medium: directory \`src/auth/\` spanning the session and token subsystems.` State tool degradation in the same line when it applies (`git unavailable>
>
>
>
>
>
Performs deep architectural analysis of a specified module, directory, or feature area by examining structural coupling, data flow, concurrency patterns, risk, and SOLID alignment. Use when the user wants to assess, evaluate, or review the architecture, design quality, dependency structure, coupling, cohesion, or technical debt of an existing part of the codebase. Not for investigating specific bugs, runtime errors, or failures — use investigate. Not for test planning — use test-planning. Not for file-level code review — use code-review. Not for researching open-ended options, prior art, or how something works — use research. Not for writing documentation or architectural decision records.
Run a comprehensive code review on local source files. Use this skill when the user asks to review, audit, inspect, evaluate, or check code, even if they never use the word \"review.\" Does not post comments to GitHub pull requests — use post-code-review-to-pr for that. Does not analyze architectural structure or module boundaries — use architectural-analysis for that. Does not explain code or a PR to build understanding before reviewing — use code-overview for that. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.