eol-checklist
Build a phase-gated EOL checklist sized to the sunset, with a named owner on every item. Use when the decision to retire is made and you need the operational plan.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills /tmp/eol-checklist && cp -r /tmp/eol-checklist/skills/eol-checklist ~/.claude/skills/eol-checklistSKILL.md
# EOL Checklist ## Purpose Turn a sunset decision into a phase-gated operational plan: what must happen, in which lifecycle phase, and who owns it. The output is a working checklist — sticky-note-sized items, each with a verb and a named function — not a strategy document. The checklist is **sized to the sunset**. A deprecated internal tool gets a dozen items across three phases. A regulated hardware line gets a cross-functional playbook across six phases with gate criteria between them. Both are correct; using the wrong one is the failure. ## Input **Works best with:** The product being sunset and any dates you're already committed to. **Also useful:** Customer and revenue scale, whether a replacement exists and how ready it is, contract or regulatory obligations, and whether hardware, inventory, or channel partners are in play. Anything supplied with the invocation itself — text after the skill name, a pasted context dump, or an appended `ARGUMENTS:` line — counts as answers already given. Use it and skip whatever it covers; don't re-ask. **Arriving empty-handed? That works too.** The skill asks up to three questions — what's being sunset and at what scale, whether there's a replacement, and what hard deadlines exist — then picks a level and builds. Unknowns become labeled assumptions rather than blockers. **Example invocations:** - `EOL checklist for our legacy reporting module, shutting down Dec 31, ~400 accounts.` - `Build the heavy checklist for a hardware retirement — service contracts, 8 resellers, UL certified.` --- ## Key Concepts ### Right-Size Before You Build **Not all EOLs play out the same.** Most land in the middle. Pick the level deliberately: | | **Level 1 — Light** | **Level 2 — Standard** | **Level 3 — Heavy** | |---|---|---|---| | Typical scope | Feature, internal tool, unversioned API | Commercial product, active customers | Revenue-critical, hardware, regulated | | Phases used | 2-3 (NSC, EOS, EOL) | 4-5 (NSC, EOS, EOE, EOM, EOL) | All 6 (NSC through EOSRV) | | Functional areas | 4 | 11 | 15 | | Gate criteria | Not needed | Between major phases | Between every phase, with approvers | | Output feel | Punch list | Working checklist with owners and dates | Cross-functional playbook | **Level 2 is the default.** Recommend a level, say why in one line, and let the user move it. If they go lighter, name the specific area that drops out so the choice is informed. **Never default to Level 3** — a heavy checklist applied to a light sunset teaches teams that EOL process is ceremony, and they'll skip it next time when it matters. The level is yours to change mid-build. "Actually make this heavier" is a normal thing to hear after the Legal row surfaces something. ### The Lifecycle Gates - **GA (General Availability):** Actively sold and fully supported - **NSC (Notice of Status Change):** The decision is communicated; planning begins - **EOS (End of Sale):** No new customers can purchase - **EOE (End of Expansion):** Existing customers cannot add capacity or seats - **EOR (End of Renewal):** Existing contracts will not be renewed - **EOM (End of Maintenance):** Bug fixes and patches stop - **EOL (End of Life):** The product is retired - **EOSRV (End of Service):** All support and service obligations end **Which of these become checklist phases:** GA is a *state*, not a phase of work — nothing is checklisted there. EOR is contract-driven and only appears when renewals are in play. So working checklists usually span the six actionable phases: **NSC, EOS, EOE, EOM, EOL, EOSRV**, with EOR inserted when subscription or service contracts run past EOS. **Naming the gates you're not using is as useful as naming the ones you are.** A Level 1 checklist should say "EOE and EOSRV don't apply — nothing to expand, nothing to service." ### The Fifteen Functional Areas Filtered by level. The parenthetical marks the lowest level where each appears: | Area | Level | |---|---| | Product and Strategy | 1 | | Engineering and Technical | 1 | | Support | 1 | | Documentation and Training | 1 | | Legal and Contractual | 2 | | Financial Planning | 2 | | Sales | 2 | | Marketing | 2 | | Customer Success | 2 | | IT Systems | 2 | | Data Management | 2 | | Inventory and Supply Chain | 3 | | Channel and Partner Management | 3 | | Regulatory and Compliance | 3 | | Internal Organizational Alignment | 3 | ### The Sticky-Note Rule Every item is **4 to 8 words**, names a **verb**, and carries a **named owner** (a function, not a person's calendar). "Legal reviews contracts" is an item. "Ensure appropriate review of all relevant contractual obligations across the customer base" is a paragraph wearing a checkbox. **Why the owner is mandatory:** an unowned item is a wish. Forcing a function onto every line surfaces cross-functional gaps early — when you can't name who owns "notify channel partners," you have just discovered that nobody does. ### Phase Gates Are Commitments, Not Dates A phase gate is what must be **true** before you advance, with an approver. "EOS to EOE: last-time-buy orders closed — Approver: Sales VP." This is what stops an EOL from being one announcement followed six months later by somebody quietly pulling a plug. ### Anti-Patterns (what this is NOT) - **Not a project plan.** No Gantt, no dependencies graph, no resource loading. - **Not exhaustive by default.** Coverage proportional to risk, not maximum ceremony. - **Not the decision.** If the sunset itself is still in question, this is premature. - **Not a substitute for the conversations.** A checklist item saying "align with Legal" is not alignment with Legal. --- ## Application ### Step 1: Set the level Recommend from blast radius — customers, revenue, contracts, hardware, partners — then present all three and let the user choose. If the level is genuinely unclear, ask: "How complex is this sunset? 1. **Light** — a feature, internal tool, or unversioned API. Few users, all reachable. 2. **Standard** — a c
Evaluate acquisition channels using unit economics, customer quality, and scalability. Use when deciding whether to scale, test, or kill a growth channel.
Design multi-agent AI workflows with clear boundaries, handoffs, and monitoring. Use when a complex PM task should run as parallel specialized agents instead of one linear process.
Assess whether your product work is AI-first or AI-shaped. Use when evaluating AI maturity and choosing the next team capability to build.
Understand the PM-to-Director transition through altitude and horizon thinking. Use when diagnosing scope, time-horizon, or leadership-level gaps.
Map evidence-backed growth options across the Ansoff Matrix with risk-rated sequencing. Use when the question is where the next tranche of growth comes from, and at what risk.
The protocol behind every investigation skill. Use when AI research must proceed without you: search-plan gate, Fact/Inference/Assumption labels, confidence stacking, diffable outputs.
Research and draft a competitive battle card from public evidence — every claim labeled and sourced. Use when a rep needs a field-action card, not a research report.
Diagnose SaaS business health across growth, retention, efficiency, and capital. Use when preparing a business review or prioritizing urgent fixes.