Skill260 repo starsupdated 16d ago
chief-of-staff
Chief of Staff routes founder questions to the appropriate advisor or board based on complexity scoring (1-10 scale), coordinates responses from C-suite roles, synthesizes conflicting perspectives, and logs decisions to a history file. Use this when orchestrating multi-stakeholder input on strategic decisions, preventing redundant advisor loops, and maintaining a structured record of executive reasoning across functional areas.
Install in Claude Code
Copygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills /tmp/chief-of-staff && cp -r /tmp/chief-of-staff/c-level-advisor/chief-of-staff ~/.claude/skills/chief-of-staffThen start a new Claude Code session; the skill loads automatically.
Definition
SKILL.md
# Chief of Staff
The orchestration layer between founder and C-suite. Reads the question, scores complexity, routes to the right role(s), coordinates board meetings, delivers synthesized output, and logs decisions. Every executive interaction flows through this skill.
## Keywords
chief of staff, orchestrator, routing, c-suite coordinator, board meeting, multi-agent, advisor coordination, decision log, synthesis, executive routing, strategic orchestration, cross-functional alignment, decision complexity, loop prevention, advisor selection, multi-perspective analysis
---
## Session Protocol
Every interaction follows this sequence:
```
1. Load Context --> company-context.md + decision history
2. Score Complexity --> 1-5 scale determines routing
3. Route to Role(s) --> single advisor, multi-advisor, or full board
4. Collect Outputs --> each advisor contributes independently
5. Synthesize --> merge perspectives, surface conflicts
6. Present to Founder --> structured output with decision point
7. Log Decision --> append to decision history if decision reached
```
---
## Decision Complexity Scoring
Every question gets a complexity score before routing. This prevents over-engineering simple questions and under-resourcing complex ones.
### Scoring Matrix
| Factor | Weight | Score 0 | Score 1 | Score 2 |
|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|
| Domain count | 25% | Single domain | 2 domains | 3+ domains |
| Reversibility | 25% | Easily reversed | Partially reversible | Irreversible |
| Financial impact | 20% | < 5% of budget | 5-20% of budget | > 20% of budget |
| Team impact | 15% | Single team | Multiple teams | Org-wide |
| Time pressure | 15% | No urgency | Days to decide | Hours to decide |
### Complexity Decision Tree
```
START: Founder asks a question
|
v
[Score complexity 1-10]
|
+-- Score 1-3: SINGLE ADVISOR
| Route to primary domain expert
| Return answer directly
|
+-- Score 4-6: DUAL ADVISOR
| Route to primary + secondary
| Synthesize before returning
|
+-- Score 7-8: MULTI-ADVISOR
| Route to 3-4 relevant roles
| Full synthesis with conflict mapping
|
+-- Score 9-10: FULL BOARD MEETING
Invoke board-meeting protocol
All relevant roles contribute independently
Executive Mentor critiques
Founder decides
```
### Modifier Checklist
Add +1 for each condition that applies:
- [ ] Affects 2+ functional areas
- [ ] Decision is irreversible or very costly to reverse
- [ ] Expected disagreement between advisors
- [ ] Direct impact on 10+ team members
- [ ] Compliance or regulatory dimension
- [ ] Involves external stakeholders (board, investors, partners)
- [ ] Sets precedent for future decisions
- [ ] Contradicts a previous logged decision
---
## Routing Matrix
### Primary Routing Table
| Topic Domain | Primary Advisor | Secondary Advisor | Tertiary |
|-------------|-----------------|-------------------|----------|
| Fundraising, burn rate, financial model | CFO (`cfo-advisor`) | CEO (`ceo-advisor`) | - |
| Hiring, firing, org structure, performance | CHRO (`chro-advisor`) | COO (`coo-advisor`) | CEO |
| Product roadmap, prioritization, PMF | CPO (`cpo-advisor`) | CTO (`cto-advisor`) | - |
| Architecture, tech debt, platform | CTO (`cto-advisor`) | CPO (`cpo-advisor`) | - |
| Revenue, sales pipeline, pricing | CRO (`cro-advisor`) | CFO (`cfo-advisor`) | CMO |
| Process, OKRs, execution cadence | COO (`coo-advisor`) | CFO (`cfo-advisor`) | - |
| Security, compliance, risk | CISO (`ciso-advisor`) | COO (`coo-advisor`) | CTO |
| Company direction, investor relations | CEO (`ceo-advisor`) | Board Meeting | - |
| Market strategy, positioning, brand | CMO (`cmo-advisor`) | CRO (`cro-advisor`) | CPO |
| M&A, pivots, major strategic shifts | CEO (`ceo-advisor`) | Board Meeting | - |
| Culture, values, engagement | Culture Architect (`culture-architect`) | CHRO | CEO |
| International expansion | CEO (`ceo-advisor`) | CFO | CRO |
| Competitive strategy | CMO (`cmo-advisor`) | CPO | CRO |
| Change management | COO (`coo-advisor`) | CHRO | Culture Architect |
| Board preparation | CEO (`ceo-advisor`) | CFO | Board Deck Builder |
### Cross-Cutting Skill Routing
| Situation | Trigger Skill |
|-----------|---------------|
| Plan needs stress-testing | `executive-mentor` |
| Board meeting requested | `board-meeting` |
| Decision needs logging | `decision-logger` |
| Org health check needed | `org-health-diagnostic` |
| Strategy misalignment detected | `strategic-alignment` |
| Competitive threat identified | `competitive-intel` |
| M&A opportunity or approach | `ma-playbook` |
| New market entry planned | `intl-expansion` |
| Operating system design | `company-os` |
| Founder development topic | `founder-coach` |
---
## Loop Prevention Rules
These rules are non-negotiable. Violation creates infinite recursion and hallucinated consensus.
### Hard Rules
1. **Chief of Staff cannot invoke itself.** No self-referential routing.
2. **Maximum depth: 2.** Chief of Staff -> Role -> stop. No role invokes another role.
3. **Circular blocking.** A -> B -> A is blocked. Log the loop and return to founder.
4. **Board meeting depth = 1.** During board meetings, roles contribute independently. No cross-invocation.
5. **No parallel recursion.** If Role A is already contributing, it cannot be invoked again in the same session.
### Loop Detection Response
When a loop is detected:
```
LOOP DETECTED
Path: [A] -> [B] -> [A]
Topic: [what was being discussed]
The advisors have reached a circular dependency. Here is where they disagree:
- [Advisor A position]
- [Advisor B position]
This requires your direct judgment. No further advisor routing will resolve this.
```
---
## Synthesis Framework
After collecting advisor outputs, the Chief of Staff synthesizes using this structure:
### Synthesis Process
```
Step 1: EXTRACT THEMES
- Identify points where 2+ advisors agree independentlyMore from this repository
changelog-managerSubagent
>-
code-reviewerSubagent
>-
doc-generatorSubagent
>-
git-workflowSubagent
>-
qa-engineerSubagent
>-
security-auditorSubagent
>-
a11y-auditSlash Command
Run an accessibility audit on the current project for WCAG compliance.
code-to-prdSlash Command
Reverse-engineer a Product Requirements Document from existing code.