Honest claim corroboration for AI agents (MCP server): syndication-aware independent-source counting, confidence scores, and published error rates. Keyless, read-only, open source.
claude mcp add corroborate-mcp -- npx -y corroborate-mcp{
"mcpServers": {
"corroborate-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "corroborate-mcp"]
}
}
}MCP Servers overview
# corroborate-mcp
**The honest corroboration layer for AI agents.** Hand it a claim; it tells you how *independently* that claim is actually being reported — and shows its work.
[](https://www.npmjs.com/package/corroborate-mcp)
[](https://www.npmjs.com/package/corroborate-mcp)
[](./LICENSE)



> An AP story echoed by 40 outlets is **one** origin, not 40 citations. Other verifiers count citations; Corroborate counts independent *origins* — syndication-aware — then publishes its own error rates and discloses coverage gaps. That's the judgment layer raw search and citation-checkers skip.
```text
corroborate_claim("NASA delayed the Artemis III landing") → CONFIRMED 4 independent origins · conf 0.9
corroborate_claim("Zorblatt Corp acquired Portugal") → UNCORROBORATED 0 origins · conf 0.05
```
## When an agent should call this
- Before **relying on a current-event / news claim** — is it independently reported, or one source echoed everywhere?
- To **rank or filter sources** by genuine independence, with a confidence score.
- When you need a **verdict you can defend** — every answer ships its evidence, its confidence, and its own caveats.
Not a web search engine (use Exa/Tavily/Brave for that) and not a human fact-checking network. It's the narrow, honest primitive in between: *how independently is this reported?*
## Why it's trustworthy — by design
| | |
|---|---|
| 🔑 **Zero API keys, zero accounts** | Keyless engines (Google News RSS · GDELT · Hacker News). Nothing to sign up for. |
| 👁 **Read-only** | It reads public news. It cannot act, write, spend, or touch your data. |
| 🎯 **Deterministic** | No LLM in the loop — same evidence in, same verdict out. p50 ~0.4s. |
| 📖 **Open source (MIT)** | Read every line of the judgment. |
| 📊 **Published error rates** | We measure our own false-CONFIRMED / false-UNCORROBORATED rates on a public benchmark and print them below. Most "fact-check" tools don't. |
| 🚫 **Never lies by omission** | If sources are unreachable it returns an **error**, never a fake "UNCORROBORATED." |
## What it measures — and what it doesn't
*Reporting corroboration*, not truth. A claim every outlet syndicated from one wire story comes back `SINGLE_SOURCE`. A claim nobody covers comes back `UNCORROBORATED` even if true. The verdict states exactly what was measured, flags its weaknesses in `notes`, and sets `coverage:"degraded"` when an engine was down — so absence of evidence is never quietly sold as evidence of absence.
## Quickstart
Requires Node ≥ 18. No keys, no config.
**Claude Code**
```bash
claude mcp add corroborate -- npx -y corroborate-mcp
```
**Claude Desktop / Cursor / any MCP client** (`claude_desktop_config.json`, `.cursor/mcp.json`, …)
```json
{ "mcpServers": { "corroborate": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "corroborate-mcp"] } } }
```
**Try it with no MCP client**
```bash
npx corroborate-mcp # starts the stdio server (silent = healthy)
# or from a checkout: node cli.js "The Federal Reserve held interest rates steady"
```
## Tools
### `corroborate_claim` — the verdict
`{ claim, window_days?=7, max_sources?=8 }` →
```json
{
"claim": "Acme Corp acquires Widget Industries for $2 billion",
"corroboration": "CONFIRMED",
"n_independent_sources": 3,
"confidence": 0.9,
"coverage": "full",
"sources": [
{ "headline": "Acme Corp to acquire Widget Industries in $2 billion deal",
"outlet": "Financial Times", "domain": "ft.com", "url": "https://…",
"published_at": "2026-07-09T14:02:00Z", "age_days": 0.9,
"wire": false, "echoed_by_n_domains": 1 }
],
"notes": ["syndication detected: near-identical headlines across multiple domains collapsed into one origin"],
"method": "reporting-corroboration: counts INDEPENDENT story origins (syndication-aware), not raw article count; does not adjudicate truth"
}
```
| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
| `corroboration` | `CONFIRMED` (≥2 independent origins) · `SINGLE_SOURCE` (1) · `UNCORROBORATED` (0) |
| `n_independent_sources` | Distinct story *origins* after syndication clustering — not article count |
| `confidence` | 0–1. Rises with origins + cross-engine agreement; penalized for wide single-origin echo |
| `coverage` | `full`, or `degraded` when an engine failed this call — a weak verdict may then reflect the outage, not the claim |
| `sources[].wire` | Origin is a wire service (AP/Reuters/AFP/UPI) |
| `sources[].echoed_by_n_domains` | How many domains carried this same story |
| `notes` | Honest caveats: syndication collapse, breaking-news cascade (<24h), relevance-gate discards, engine outages |
### `find_sources` — the raw evidence
`{ query, window_days?=7, max_sources?=10 }` → deduped multi-engine list (outlet, domain, url, date), no verdict. The cheaper primitive when you want the coverage and your own judgment.
## Measured accuracy — because you should demand it from any fact-check tool
Against a public 40-claim labeled benchmark ([benchmark/](benchmark/) — claims, labels, category definitions, and harness are all public; run it yourself with `npm run benchmark`). The time-sensitive claims are refreshed from current news so the numbers reflect real accuracy, not staleness. Latest run **2026-07-22**:
| Metric | Result |
|---|---|
| Fabricated claims falsely CONFIRMED | **0/10** |
| Widely-reported true claims missed | **0/12** (11 CONFIRMED, 1 single-source) |
| Niche true claims detected | 7/8 |
| Stale claims correctly windowed | 2/5 |
| **Distorted claims falsely CONFIRMED** | **6/6 — read the warning ↓** |
| Latency | p50 0.4s · p95 <1s (≤8s worst case when the slow engine is up) |
**⚠️ Respect the distorted-claim number — it's the honest ceiling of this tool's blind spot.** In the latest run **all 6 distorted claims came back CONFIRMED (6/6)**, because each one distorts a *currently-reported* event, and this tool checks whether independent reporting exists around a claim's topic and entities — it does **not** do stance detection. So "Samsung *cancelled* the Galaxy Z Fold8" (they unveiled it) or "OpenAI released GPT-6" confirms off the real coverage of the true story. **The rule to live by: if a claim's topic is being reported, a distorted version of it will very likely CONFIRM.** Read CONFIRMED as *"this topic has independent coverage — now verify the specific facts against the returned sources,"* never as "this exact claim is true." Stance detection is the v1.1 roadmap item. (Recurring events like championships/elections can likewise match the current cycle's coverage — see the stale-claim leaks.)
## How the judgment works
1. **Search** Google News RSS, GDELT, Hacker News in parallel (keywords extracted from the claim; quoted phrases preserved).
2. **Relevance gate** — an article counts only if its headline genuinely addresses the claim (≥2 core-token hits AND ≥35% of core tokens). Loose topical echoes are discarded; the discard count is reported.
3. **Syndication clustering** — near-identical headlines across domains (Jaccard ≥ 0.55) collapse into one origin; wire domains flagged.
4. **Verdict** — independent origins = distinct clusters; confidence rises with origins + cross-engine agreement, falls for wide single-origin echoes; every known weakness goes in `notes`.
## Honest limitations
- **No stance detection** (the 6/6 above). CONFIRMED = independently *covered*, not verified in every detail.
- English-language, headline-level. Paywalled body text isn't fetched.
- Recency-windowed (default 7 days, max 90). Old claims read `UNCORROBORATED` — a window statement, not a falsity verdict.
- Independent rewrites of one wire story can occasionally slip clustering; distinct phrasings of one origin can occasionally count as two.
- All engines down → **error**, never a fake `UNCORROBORATED`.
## Development
```bash
npm test # golden-claim suite — deterministic, no network
npm run test:mcp # MCP stdio handshake + tools/list
npm run test:live # live invariants against real engines
npm run benchmark # 40-claim labeled accuracy benchmark (live, ~2 min)
npm run test:release # all of the above — required green before every release
```
MIT © Ezra Cohen · [github](https://github.com/chefcohen/corroborate-mcp) · [npm](https://www.npmjs.com/package/corroborate-mcp)
What people ask about corroborate-mcp
What is chefcohen/corroborate-mcp?
+
chefcohen/corroborate-mcp is mcp servers for the Claude AI ecosystem. Honest claim corroboration for AI agents (MCP server): syndication-aware independent-source counting, confidence scores, and published error rates. Keyless, read-only, open source. It has 0 GitHub stars and was last updated today.
How do I install corroborate-mcp?
+
You can install corroborate-mcp by cloning the repository (https://github.com/chefcohen/corroborate-mcp) or following the README instructions on GitHub. ClaudeWave also provides quick install blocks on this page.
Is chefcohen/corroborate-mcp safe to use?
+
chefcohen/corroborate-mcp has not been audited yet by our security agent. Review the original repository on GitHub before using it in production.
Who maintains chefcohen/corroborate-mcp?
+
chefcohen/corroborate-mcp is maintained by chefcohen. The last recorded GitHub activity is from today, with 0 open issues.
Are there alternatives to corroborate-mcp?
+
Yes. On ClaudeWave you can browse similar mcp servers at /categories/mcp, sorted by popularity or recent activity.
Deploy corroborate-mcp to your cloud
Ship this repo to production in minutes. Each platform spins up its own environment with editable env vars.
Maintain this repo? Add a badge to your README
Drop the badge into your GitHub README to show it's tracked on ClaudeWave. Each badge links back to this page and reflects the live Trust Score.
[](https://claudewave.com/repo/chefcohen-corroborate-mcp)<a href="https://claudewave.com/repo/chefcohen-corroborate-mcp"><img src="https://claudewave.com/api/badge/chefcohen-corroborate-mcp" alt="Featured on ClaudeWave: chefcohen/corroborate-mcp" width="320" height="64" /></a>More MCP Servers
Fair-code workflow automation platform with native AI capabilities. Combine visual building with custom code, self-host or cloud, 400+ integrations.
User-friendly AI Interface (Supports Ollama, OpenAI API, ...)
An open-source AI agent that brings the power of Gemini directly into your terminal.
The fastest path to AI-powered full stack observability, even for lean teams.
🕷️ An adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full-scale crawl!
Real-time global intelligence dashboard. AI-powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface