A native knowledge language for LLMs — structured, provenance-tracked, verifiable.
- ✓Open-source license (MIT)
- ✓Actively maintained (<30d)
- ✓Clear description
- ✓Documented (README)
git clone https://github.com/factum-project/factum{
"mcpServers": {
"factum": {
"command": "factum"
}
}
}MCP Servers overview
# Factum — Auditable Memory for AI Agents > **Status: v0.1.3 — Early stage, seeking early collaborators.** > Core write/query/retract pipeline works. Not production-ready. Architectural decisions are still open to change.     > **[Interactive docs](https://factum-project.github.io/factum/)** — animated syntax parsing, 7-tuple explorer, query pipeline, token efficiency chart, and MCP architecture diagram. Every fact an agent writes carries mandatory provenance. When a source is retracted, everything derived from it is invalidated automatically — cascade retraction. When facts conflict, Factum returns `Ambiguous` instead of guessing. A structured knowledge language (S-expression based), Rust implementation, stdio MCP server — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP client. **Status: v0.1.3, early stage.** Core write/query/retract pipeline works; no semantic search or memory consolidation yet — Factum handles verified structured facts, not conversation context. Best suited for compliance-sensitive agents, multi-agent shared knowledge bases, and anywhere "why did the agent believe X" needs an answer. ## How is this different from Mem0 / Zep / Letta? **Unique to Factum:** grammar-enforced provenance · cascade retraction · conflict refusal. **Not (yet) in Factum:** embedding-based semantic retrieval · memory consolidation · HTTP transport. Complementary: Mem0/Letta store and retrieve context; Factum stores auditable structured facts. They can run side by side via MCP. ### What this means in practice | Agent memory pain point | Factum mechanism | |------------------------|------------------| | Can't tell "user said" from "LLM inferred" | 5-level provenance + grammar-enforced model name on Extracted nodes | | Stale memory used as current fact | Soft delete + cascade retraction via reverse dependency graph | | Conflicting memories silently pick one | `Ambiguous` — refuses to answer rather than guess | | Memory pollution (prompt injection) | Provenance chain makes contamination traceable and retractable | | Enterprise can't let agents store sensitive data | Index-level permission filtering — no post-query leakage | > **Academic context:** The [STALE benchmark](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06527) (2025) shows that even the best LLM agents achieve only 55.2% accuracy at detecting when their own memories are outdated — confirming that memory staleness is an unsolved problem in agent systems. ## Key Features (Implemented) - **Node 7-tuple**: Every knowledge node carries id, predicate, validity, provenance, confidence, authority, and permissions - **5-level provenance**: Verbatim / Summary / Extracted / Derived / Asserted — full audit chain - **Grammar-enforced model reference**: `Extracted` nodes MUST carry model + version — the parser rejects them if missing (not just a documentation convention) - **Cascade retraction**: Derived nodes auto-invalidate when upstream sources are retracted (via `deps_rev` reverse dependency graph) - **Conflict arbitration**: LatestWins / HighestAuthority / Unanimous — returns `Ambiguous` when it cannot uniquely resolve - **Index-level permissions**: No post-query filtering — prevents aggregate leakage - **Lossless numerics**: All numbers use `Dec(i128, u8)` — zero floating-point error - **MCP bridge**: JSON-RPC 2.0 tools/resources; **stdio transport verified** with real MCP clients (Claude Code, Cursor) ## What's Implemented vs. What's Not | Module | Status | Notes | |--------|--------|-------| | factum-core (types, lexer, parser, serialize) | ✅ Implemented | 100% syntactic round-trip | | factum-rt (store, query, arbitration, permissions, verifiers) | ✅ Implemented | In-memory store (default) + **RocksDB persistence** (`--features rocksdb`); 5 column families, WriteBatch atomic writes | | factum-mcp (JSON-RPC bridge) | ✅ Protocol + handler | **stdio transport verified** end-to-end; HTTP transport not yet implemented (remote deployment requires custom wrapper) | | factum-bench (benchmarks) | ✅ Implemented | Syntax round-trip + token efficiency + query perf | | factum-l (latent space projection) | ❌ Not started | Research item — see ROADMAP.md | | Wikidata/Mathlib corpus converters | ❌ Not started | M2 milestone | | Lean/Z3 verifiers | ❌ Not started | Only Schema + DecimalRange verifiers implemented | | Embedding-based semantic search | ❌ Not started | Not on roadmap — consider using Mem0 alongside Factum | | Memory consolidation/summarization | ❌ Not started | Not on roadmap — consider using Letta alongside Factum | | Inspector (visual debugger) | ❌ Not started | | ## Quick Start ```bash # Build cargo build # Run tests cargo test # Run demo cargo run -p factum-demo # Build with RocksDB persistence backend cargo build --features rocksdb cargo test --features rocksdb # Build MCP server with RocksDB persistence cargo build --release -p factum-mcp --features rocksdb --bin factum-mcp-server # Fuzz (requires nightly) cargo +nightly fuzz run fuzz_parser -- -max_total_time=600 ``` ### Use as an MCP server (Claude Code / Cursor) ```bash # Build the MCP server binary (in-memory, default) cargo build --release -p factum-mcp --bin factum-mcp-server # Or build with RocksDB persistence (survives restarts) cargo build --release -p factum-mcp --features rocksdb --bin factum-mcp-server # Register with Claude Code (in-memory) claude mcp add --transport stdio --scope local factum -- "$(pwd)/target/release/factum-mcp-server" # Register with Claude Code (persistent — recommended for agent memory) claude mcp add --transport stdio --scope local factum -- \ "$(pwd)/target/release/factum-mcp-server" --db-path ~/.factum/store # Verify connection claude mcp get factum ``` See [Getting Started with Factum MCP](docs/getting-started-mcp.md) for the full guide. ## Factum-F Syntax Example ```scheme ; Acme Corp knowledge graph (node n001 :pred (instance-of @ACME-CORP organization) :conf 0.99 :auth 0.95 :perm public :src (asserted "wikidata")) (node n004 :pred (shareholder-major @ACME-CORP @FOUNDER-1 0.73 :since #date(2001-03-15)) :conf 0.85 :auth 0.8 :perm confidential :src (extracted "doc002" [100 200] (model "claude-sonnet-4" "2025-01"))) (node n006 :pred (subsidiary-of @ACME-SUB @ACME-CORP :since #date(2001-03-15)) :src (derived n001 "rule-subsidiary-merge") :deps [n001]) ``` When n001 is retracted, n006 is automatically invalidated — the agent knows it can no longer trust the subsidiary relationship. ## Three-Layer Architecture | Layer | What It Means | Status | |-------|--------------|--------| | **Agent Read** | Agent receives Factum-F as context via MCP — lower token overhead than verbose JSON | ✅ Token efficiency measured (real o200k_base: canonical −62%, compact −53% vs JSON) | | **Agent Write** | Agent generates Factum-F nodes — parse uniqueness guarantees one valid interpretation, error classes enable self-correction | ✅ See [authoring guide](docs/authoring-for-llms.md) | | **Latent Reasoning** | factum-l: encode Factum-F into continuous thought vector, reason in latent space, decode back for audit | 🔬 Research item — not started, not blocking layers 1-2 | A structured knowledge language underpins the memory layer — S-expression based for parse uniqueness, with `Dec(i128, u8)` for lossless numerics and mandatory model references for LLM self-auditing. Full design rationale in [docs/design-rationale.md](docs/design-rationale.md). ## Token Efficiency — The LLM-Native Metric > **TL;DR: Factum canonical form saves ~62% tokens vs verbose JSON with the same metadata. All numbers measured with real o200k_base (GPT-4o) tokenizer via tiktoken-rs.** | Format | Real tokens (5 nodes) | vs verbose JSON | What it includes | |--------|-----------------------|-----------------|------------------| | Factum canonical | 238 | **−62%** | Full 7-tuple: provenance + confidence + validity + permissions | | Factum compact (JSON) | 290 | −53% | Same 7-tuple, JSON with numeric tags | | Markdown | 181 | −71% | Assertion text only — **no provenance, no confidence, no permissions** | | JSON (pretty) | 623 | baseline | Same 7-tuple metadata in verbose JSON encoding | > Run `cargo test -p factum-bench test_token_efficiency_real_tokenizer -- --nocapture` to reproduce. **Key finding**: The canonical S-expression form (238 tokens) is more token-efficient than the compact JSON form (290 tokens) — BPE tokenizers split JSON delimiters but merge S-expression parentheses. The form designed for correctness is also the most token-efficient. ## Round-Trip Fidelity — What Exactly Is 100%? 1. **Syntactic round-trip** ✅ — `parse(serialize(parse(x))) == parse(x)`. **100% and verified by the test suite + fuzzing.** This is the trust foundation. 2. **Semantic round-trip** ❌ Not yet measured — requires factum-l (latent space projection, not implemented). ## Morpheme Vocabulary — Current State - **Seed morphemes**: 200+ across 9 kinds (Entity, Relation, Quantifier, Modal, Temporal, Status, Action, Attribute, Classification) — covering organizational, people, spatial, financial, product/project, version control, document/knowledge, agent memory, permission, and cause/effect domains - **Design target**: 200–500 (to be loaded from `morphemes.toml` via `build.rs`) - **Status**: Sufficient for agent memory use cases. `morphemes.toml` codegen is a future M2 item for external contributions. ## Relationship to Other Formats | Format | How Factum Differs | |--------|-------------------| | **RDF / JSON-LD** | RDF triples carry no per-node provenance, confidence, or permissions. Factum makes these first-class and non-optional. | | **Markdown** | Markdown has zero metadata. Factum trades human readability for machine verifiability. | | **J
What people ask about factum
What is factum-project/factum?
+
factum-project/factum is mcp servers for the Claude AI ecosystem. A native knowledge language for LLMs — structured, provenance-tracked, verifiable. It has 3 GitHub stars and its last recorded update is dated 2026-09-15.
How do I install factum?
+
You can install factum by cloning the repository (https://github.com/factum-project/factum) or following the README instructions on GitHub. ClaudeWave also provides quick install blocks on this page.
Is factum-project/factum safe to use?
+
Our security agent has analyzed factum-project/factum and assigned a Trust Score of 87/100 (tier: Trusted). See the full breakdown of passed checks and flags on this page.
Who maintains factum-project/factum?
+
factum-project/factum is maintained by factum-project. The last recorded GitHub activity is dated 2026-09-15, with 7 open issues.
Are there alternatives to factum?
+
Yes. On ClaudeWave you can browse similar mcp servers at /categories/mcp, sorted by popularity or recent activity.
Deploy factum to your cloud
Ship this repo to production in minutes. Each platform spins up its own environment with editable env vars.
Maintain this repo? Add a badge to your README
Drop the badge into your GitHub README to show it's tracked on ClaudeWave. Each badge links back to this page and reflects the live Trust Score.
[](https://claudewave.com/repo/factum-project-factum)<a href="https://claudewave.com/repo/factum-project-factum"><img src="https://claudewave.com/api/badge/factum-project-factum" alt="Featured on ClaudeWave: factum-project/factum" width="320" height="64" /></a>More MCP Servers
Fair-code workflow automation platform with native AI capabilities. Combine visual building with custom code, self-host or cloud, 400+ integrations.
User-friendly AI Interface (Supports Ollama, OpenAI API, ...)
An open-source AI agent that brings the power of Gemini directly into your terminal.
Real-time global intelligence dashboard. AI-powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface
🕷️ An adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full-scale crawl! Don't be shy, join here: https://discord.gg/EMgGbDceNQ
The fastest path to AI-powered full stack observability, even for lean teams.