Skills de Claude Code · página 138

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Create, polish, and quality-check editable undergraduate or graduate thesis defense PowerPoint decks from a local thesis PDF/LaTeX project and an existing PPTX template. Use when the user asks for a formal defense PPT, thesis presentation, academic答辩PPT, template-matched PPTX, or local PowerPoint deck generation with visual inspection.

Use when 用户想以一对一苏格拉底导师的方式系统学习一个课题——开一门新课、推进课题的下一篇、提交学习反馈或说「我读完了」、或整理/查看学习日志。基于 Bloom 2 Sigma 的交互式学习系统。触发词：开个文件夹学X、我想学X、帮我学X、继续、下一篇、我读完了、整理学习、查看学习日志、interactive Socratic tutoring、Bloom 2 sigma learning。

当用户学习或接触一个新概念/新技术/新算法/新领域时使用（尤其感到陌生或有点难时）。用「跨界原则」拿用户已掌握的知识快速撬动新知识——指出他其实已经学过的同一个东西（换了名字）、结构同构的旧知识、能解释新知识的已有知识，并点出新概念体现的跨领域元知识模式。让「学新东西」变成「发现你已经会了一半」。触发场景：学 X、接触 X、这个好难、X 是什么、帮我理解 X。

用户学任何新概念/新技术/新理论的默认深度入口——一次性用五个视角把概念讲透并帮他选深入方向：crossover 用已会的撬动、occam 框定该学多深、graph 建知识地图、prototype 最小原型迭代、feynman 拷问检验。触发场景：我想学 X、理解 X、X 是什么、讲讲 X、搞懂 X、学一下 X、深入 X、给我讲讲 X。除非用户明确只要某一个视角（那时改用对应的单个 learn-* skill）。

当用户学完一个东西想自查是否真懂、或觉得「好像懂了」但不确定时使用。用「费曼学习法」让他用自己的话把概念讲出来，你扮好奇学生专挑他含糊/跳过的地方追问，把「讲不顺的模糊处」揪出来作为没真懂的漏洞，定位是缺前置知识还是没想透，判断理解是否闭环。触发场景：我学完了考考我、自查一下、我好像懂了、我讲讲你看对不对、检验我的理解、这个我真懂了吗。

当用户要系统学一个新领域、不知道从哪入手、或担心「学得不够系统」时使用。用「知识图谱学习法」和用户一起构建该领域的概念/用途/父子节点图谱（自己建图的过程本身就是学习），标出复用价值最高的节点和「从常识就能入门的点」，给出有效学习路径并回答「学到哪算够」。触发场景：系统学 X 领域、从哪开始学、学得不系统、想要 X 的全貌、规划学习路径、这个领域有多大。

当用户纠结要不要学某个东西、学到什么程度，或在做时间/精力/项目取舍时使用。用「简易策略」先逼问要解决的既定问题，检验现有知识能否搞定，评估知识贬值速度与 ROI，用「探索 vs 应用」判断该学新的还是用现有的，给出「学 / 不学 / 只学最小够用」的结论，避免囤积会贬值的知识。触发场景：要不要学 X、值不值得深入、学到什么程度够、时间不够该学啥、该深挖还是够用就行。

当用户要做/研究一个东西、想提升某个技能、或觉得某个产出不够好想改进时使用。用「改良主义」先逼出一个最垃圾但能跑的原型，再引导他自己洞察缺陷、提出问题，提改良假说→实践检验→迭代，信奉「洞察缺陷 > 如何优化 > 最终答案」，并把每次改进的方法本身沉淀成方法论。触发场景：要做 X、研究 X、提升 X、X 做得不好想改进、怎么优化 X、不知从哪下手做。

Export, write, and manage Feishu/Lark cloud documents. Supports docx, sheets, bitable, wiki, WeChat article import/export, drive management, and browser-based export for public or browser-readable docs. Use this skill when you need to read, analyze, write, or manage content in a Feishu knowledge base.

Applies abstract interpretation using different abstract domains (intervals, octagons, polyhedra, sign, congruence) to statically analyze program variables and infer invariants, value ranges, and relationships. Use when analyzing program properties, inferring loop invariants, detecting potential errors, or understanding variable relationships through static analysis.

Uses abstract interpretation to automatically infer loop invariants, function preconditions, and postconditions for formal verification. Generates invariants that capture program behavior and support correctness proofs in Dafny, Isabelle, Coq, and other verification systems. Use when adding formal specifications to code, generating verification conditions, inferring contracts for functions, or discovering loop invariants for proofs.

Performs abstract interpretation over source code to infer possible program states, variable ranges, and data properties without executing the program. Reports potential runtime errors including out-of-bounds accesses, null dereferences, type inconsistencies, division by zero, and integer overflows. Use when analyzing code for potential runtime errors, performing static analysis, checking safety properties, or verifying program behavior without execution.

Performs abstract interpretation to produce summarized execution traces and high-level program behavior representations. Highlights key control flow paths, variable relationships, loop invariants, function summaries, and potential runtime states using abstract domains (intervals, signs, nullness, etc.). Use when analyzing program behavior, understanding execution paths, computing loop invariants, tracking variable ranges, detecting potential runtime errors, or generating program summaries without concrete execution.

Create ACSL (ANSI/ISO C Specification Language) formal annotations for C/C++ programs. Use this skill when working with formal verification, adding function contracts (requires/ensures), loop invariants, assertions, memory safety annotations, or any ACSL specifications. Supports Frama-C verification and generates comprehensive formal specifications for C/C++ code.

CLI-based browser automation with persistent page state using ref-based element interaction. Use when users ask to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, test web applications, or extract information from web pages.

Detects and analyzes ambiguous language in software requirements and user stories. Use when reviewing requirements documents, user stories, specifications, or any software requirement text to identify vague quantifiers, unclear scope, undefined terms, missing edge cases, subjective language, and incomplete specifications. Provides detailed analysis with clarifying questions and suggested improvements.

Design and review APIs with suggestions for endpoints, parameters, return types, and best practices. Use when designing new APIs from requirements, reviewing existing API designs, generating API documentation, or getting implementation guidance. Supports REST APIs with focus on endpoint structure, request/response schemas, authentication, pagination, filtering, versioning, and OpenAPI specifications. Triggers when users ask to design, review, document, or improve APIs.

Generate comprehensive API documentation from repository sources including OpenAPI specs, code comments, docstrings, and existing documentation. Use when documenting APIs, creating API reference guides, or summarizing API functionality from codebases. Extracts endpoint details, request/response schemas, authentication methods, and generates code examples. Triggers when users ask to document APIs, generate API docs, create API reference, or summarize API endpoints from a repository.

Generate test assertions from existing code implementation. Use when the user has implementation code without tests or incomplete test coverage, and needs assertions synthesized by analyzing the code's behavior, inputs, outputs, and state changes. Supports Python (pytest/unittest), Java (JUnit/AssertJ), and JavaScript/TypeScript (Jest/Chai). Handles equality checks, collections, exceptions, and state verification.

Compare runtime behavior between original and migrated repositories to detect behavioral differences, regressions, and semantic changes. Use when validating code migrations, refactorings, language ports, framework upgrades, or any transformation that should preserve behavior. Automatically compares test results, execution traces, API responses, and observable outputs between two repository versions. Provides actionable guidance for fixing deviations and ensuring behavioral equivalence.

Analyzes surviving mutants from mutation testing to identify why tests failed to detect them. Takes repository code, test suite, and mutation testing results as input. Identifies root causes including insufficient coverage, equivalent mutants, weak assertions, and missed edge cases. Automatically generates actionable test improvements and new test cases. Use when analyzing mutation testing results, improving test suite effectiveness, investigating low mutation scores, generating tests to kill surviving mutants, or enhancing test quality based on mutation analysis.

Instrument code to support efficient git bisect by producing deterministic pass/fail signals and concise runtime summaries for each tested commit. Use when debugging regressions with git bisect, automating bisect workflows, creating bisect test scripts, handling flaky tests during bisection, or needing clear exit codes and logging for automated bisect runs. Helps identify the exact commit that introduced a bug through automated testing.

Summarizes the complete lifecycle of a bug across code versions, tracking its introduction, detection, fixing attempts, and regression history. Use when users need to: (1) Understand how a bug evolved over time, (2) Trace when and how a bug was introduced, (3) Analyze fix attempts and their effectiveness, (4) Identify regression patterns, (5) Generate bug lifecycle reports for documentation or post-mortems. Takes a repository, bug identifier, and version history as input.

Identify the precise location of bugs in source code, modules, and systems. Use this skill when debugging applications, investigating test failures, analyzing error reports, tracing runtime issues, or performing root cause analysis. Analyzes stack traces, error messages, failing tests, and code patterns to pinpoint buggy functions, classes, files, or modules with confidence rankings and supporting evidence.

Automatically generates executable tests that reproduce reported bugs from issue reports and code repositories. Use when users need to: (1) Create a test that reproduces a bug described in an issue report, (2) Generate failing tests from bug descriptions, stack traces, or error messages, (3) Validate bug reports by creating reproducible test cases, (4) Convert issue reports into executable regression tests. Takes a repository and issue report as input and produces test code that reliably triggers the reported bug.

Generate code fixes and patches from bug reports, failing test cases, error messages, and stack traces. Use this skill when debugging code, fixing test failures, addressing GitHub issues, resolving runtime errors, or patching security vulnerabilities. Analyzes the bug context, identifies root causes, and generates precise code patches with explanations and validation steps.

Automatically migrates build systems and CI/CD configurations to target platforms. Use when modernizing build infrastructure, switching CI/CD providers, or standardizing across projects. Supports common migration paths including Maven↔Gradle, npm↔Yarn, Travis CI→GitHub Actions, CircleCI→GitHub Actions, Jenkins→GitLab CI, and GitLab CI→GitHub Actions. Analyzes existing configuration, generates equivalent target configuration, maps dependencies and commands, and provides validation and migration documentation.

Translate C or C++ programs into equivalent Lean4 code, preserving program semantics and ensuring the generated code is well-typed, executable, and can run successfully. Use when the user asks to convert C/C++ code to Lean4, port C/C++ programs to Lean4, translate imperative code to functional Lean4, or create Lean4 versions of C/C++ algorithms.

Generate GitHub Actions deployment workflows for automated deployment to staging and production environments on cloud platforms (AWS, GCP, Azure). Use when setting up continuous deployment pipelines, creating deployment automation, or configuring multi-environment deployment strategies. Includes templates for environment-specific deployments with approval gates, secrets management, and rollback capabilities.

Automatically generates change logs from git commits, patches, and pull requests. Use when preparing software releases, creating version summaries, or maintaining CHANGELOG.md files. Analyzes commit messages (including conventional commits), diff/patch files, and PR data to produce categorized Markdown change logs organized by type (Features, Bug Fixes, Breaking Changes, etc.). Ideal for release notes, version updates, and automated changelog maintenance.

Generate GitHub Actions CI/CD pipeline configurations for automated building and testing of library and package projects. Use when creating or updating CI workflows for npm packages, Python packages, Go modules, Rust crates, or other library projects that need automated build and test pipelines. Includes templates for common package ecosystems with best practices for dependency caching, matrix testing, and artifact publishing.

Generates clear and structured pull request descriptions from code changes. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Create PR descriptions from git diffs or code changes, (2) Summarize what changed and why, (3) Document breaking changes with migration guides, (4) Add technical details and design decisions, (5) Provide testing instructions, (6) Enhance descriptions with security, performance, and architecture notes, (7) Document dependency changes. Takes code changes as input, outputs comprehensive PR description in Markdown.

Generates meaningful comments and documentation for code to improve maintenance and readability. Use when adding documentation to Python or Java code, including function/method docstrings, class documentation, inline explanations for complex logic, and code annotations (TODO, FIXME). Analyzes existing comment style in the codebase to match conventions. Produces clear, concise comments that explain the "why" not just the "what", following best practices for each language.

Automatically complete partial code snippets while satisfying semantic constraints including variable types, invariants, pre/post-conditions, interface contracts, and expected input/output behavior. Use when users provide incomplete code with specific requirements like "complete this function that takes a list and returns sorted unique elements" or "fill in this method body that must maintain the invariant that x stays positive" or "implement this interface method with these type constraints." Produces compilable, executable code with tests and a constraint satisfaction report.

Automatically instruments source code to collect runtime information such as function calls, branch decisions, variable values, and execution traces while preserving original program semantics. Use when users need to: (1) Add logging or tracing to code for debugging, (2) Collect runtime execution data for analysis, (3) Monitor function calls and control flow, (4) Track variable values during execution, (5) Generate execution traces for testing or profiling. Supports Python, Java, JavaScript, and C/C++ with configurable instrumentation levels.

Analyzes and optimizes code for better performance, memory usage, and efficiency. Use when code is slow, memory-intensive, or inefficient. Supports Python and Java optimization including execution speed improvements, memory reduction, database query optimization, and I/O efficiency. Provides before/after examples with detailed explanations of why optimizations work, complexity analysis, and measurable performance improvements.

Analyze codebases to identify reusable code patterns, duplications, and implementation patterns for future development. Use when refactoring code, identifying technical debt, finding opportunities for abstraction, or documenting common patterns in a directory or module. Outputs pattern catalogs, refactoring suggestions, and reusable template code.

Suggest and apply code refactorings to improve readability, maintainability, and code quality. Use this skill when improving existing code structure, eliminating code smells, applying design patterns, simplifying complex logic, extracting duplicated code, renaming for clarity, or preparing code for new features. Provides specific before/after examples, explains benefits, identifies risks, and ensures behavior preservation through tests.

Automatically repair buggy code and generate comprehensive tests for Python, Java, and C++ programs. Use when users need to fix logic errors or runtime errors in functions, modules, or repositories. Accepts specifications via natural language descriptions, existing test cases, or input/output examples. Generates corrected code, creates or updates tests to verify correctness and prevent regressions, and produces a detailed report explaining the bug, fix, and testing strategy. Triggers on requests like "fix this bug", "repair this code", "debug this function", or "this code is broken".

Conduct comprehensive code reviews identifying bugs, security issues, performance problems, code quality concerns, and best practice violations. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, evaluating new code, assessing code quality, or providing feedback on implementations. Analyzes code for correctness, security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, maintainability issues, test coverage, documentation quality, and adherence to coding standards. Produces structured markdown reviews with categorized findings, severity ratings, specific examples, and actionable recommendations. Triggers when users ask to review code, check pull requests, evaluate implementations, find bugs, or assess code quality.

Search code repositories for code related to a given code snippet, ranking results by call chain similarity, textual similarity, and functional similarity. Use when finding related code, locating similar implementations, discovering code dependencies, or identifying code that performs similar operations. Outputs ranked file lists with matching code snippets and relevance scores.

Identify and report code smells indicating poor design or maintainability issues in Python code, including duplicate code, magic numbers, hardcoded values, God classes, feature envy, inappropriate intimacy, data clumps, primitive obsession, and long parameter lists. Use when conducting code quality audits, preparing for refactoring, improving codebase maintainability, or performing design reviews. Produces markdown reports with severity ratings, locations, descriptions, and specific refactoring recommendations with before/after examples. Triggers when users ask to find code smells, identify design issues, suggest refactorings, improve code quality, or detect maintainability problems.

Generate concise summaries of source code at multiple scales. Use when users ask to summarize, explain, or understand code - whether it's a single function, a class, a module, or an entire codebase. Handles function-level code by explaining intention and core logic, and large codebases by providing high-level overviews with drill-down capabilities for specific modules.

Convert code between programming languages while preserving functionality and semantics. Use when: (1) Translating functions, classes, or modules between languages (Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Go, Rust, C/C++), (2) Migrating entire projects to a different language, (3) Need idiomatic translation that follows target language conventions, (4) Converting between different paradigms (OOP to functional, etc.), (5) Porting legacy code to modern languages. Provides language-specific patterns, idiomatic translation guides, and project migration strategies.

Identifies boundaries between modules or components in software systems through static code analysis and dependency detection. Use when Claude needs to analyze software architecture, identify module boundaries, detect boundary violations, find circular dependencies, or assess component coupling. Supports Python (packages and imports) and Java (packages and dependencies). Trigger when users ask to "identify boundaries", "find component boundaries", "detect boundary violations", "analyze module structure", "check architecture", or "find circular dependencies".

Automatically analyzes configuration files to detect inconsistencies, conflicts, missing keys, and divergent values across environments, versions, or modules. Use when managing multi-environment configurations, detecting config drift, validating configuration changes, or ensuring consistency across microservices. Supports JSON, YAML, TOML, INI, XML, .env, and properties files. Identifies security issues like hardcoded secrets and provides actionable resolution guidance.

Generate configuration files for applications, services, and infrastructure. Use when: (1) Setting up new projects (package.json, requirements.txt, tsconfig.json), (2) Creating Docker or Kubernetes configurations, (3) Configuring CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI), (4) Setting up web servers (Nginx, Apache), (5) Defining infrastructure as code (Terraform, CloudFormation), (6) Generating linter/formatter configs (ESLint, Prettier, Black). Provides templates and custom-generated configs for diverse tech stacks.

Identifies and analyzes conflicts in software requirements including logical contradictions, technical incompatibilities, resource constraints, timeline issues, data conflicts, and stakeholder priority mismatches. Use when reviewing requirement sets, specifications, user stories, or project plans to detect conflicts that could block implementation or cause rework. Provides detailed conflict analysis with resolution strategies and impact assessment.

Generate Dockerfiles, Docker Compose configurations, and Kubernetes manifests for containerizing applications. Use when: (1) Creating Dockerfiles for Node.js, Python, Java, Go, or other applications, (2) Setting up multi-service environments with Docker Compose, (3) Generating Kubernetes deployments, services, and ingress configurations, (4) Optimizing container images for production, (5) Implementing containerization best practices. Provides both ready-to-use templates and custom-generated configurations based on project requirements.

Generate abstract Control Flow Graph (CFG) representations of programs showing loops, branches, and function calls for static analysis or verification. Use when users need to: (1) Visualize program control flow structure, (2) Generate CFGs for static analysis tools, (3) Create control flow abstractions for formal verification, (4) Analyze program paths and reachability, (5) Document program structure. Supports both function-level (intraprocedural) and program-level (interprocedural) analysis with multiple output formats (textual, DOT/Graphviz, JSON).

Debug proof failures using counterexamples from Nitpick (Isabelle) or QuickChick (Coq) to identify specification errors, missing preconditions, and proof strategy issues. Use when: (1) A proof attempt fails and you need to understand why, (2) Counterexamples are generated by Nitpick or QuickChick, (3) Specifications may be incorrect or incomplete, (4) Theorems need validation before proving, (5) Missing preconditions or lemmas need identification, or (6) Proof failures need explanation and correction suggestions. Supports both Isabelle/HOL and Coq equally.

Explain why counterexamples violate specifications by analyzing formal specifications (temporal logic, invariants, pre/postconditions, code contracts), informal requirements (user stories, acceptance criteria), test specifications (assertions, property-based tests), and providing step-by-step traces showing state changes, comparing expected vs actual behavior, identifying root causes, and assessing violation impact. Use when debugging test failures, understanding model checker output, explaining runtime assertion violations, analyzing static analysis warnings, or teaching specification concepts. Produces structured markdown explanations with traces, comparisons, state diagrams, and cause chains. Triggers when users ask why something failed, explain a violation, understand a counterexample, debug a specification, or analyze why a test fails.

Generate concrete counterexamples when formal verification, assertions, or specifications fail. Use this skill when debugging failed proofs, understanding why verification fails, creating minimal reproducing examples, analyzing assertion violations, investigating invariant breaks, or diagnosing specification mismatches. Produces concrete input values, execution traces, and state information that demonstrate the failure.

Automatically generates executable test cases from model checking counterexample traces. Translates abstract counterexample states and transitions into concrete test inputs, execution steps, and assertions that reproduce property violations. Use when working with model checker outputs (SPIN, CBMC, NuSMV, TLA+, Java PathFinder, etc.) and needing to create regression tests, validate bug fixes, or reproduce verification failures in executable test suites.

Analyze existing test suites and source code to suggest additional unit tests that improve test coverage. Use this skill when working with test files and source code to identify untested code paths, missing edge cases, uncovered branches, untested error conditions, and gaps in test coverage. Supports major testing frameworks (pytest, Jest, JUnit, Go testing, etc.) and generates targeted test suggestions based on coverage analysis.

Translate C/C++ programs to equivalent Dafny code while preserving semantics and ensuring verification. Use when users ask to convert, translate, or port C/C++ code to Dafny, or when they need to formally verify C/C++ algorithms using Dafny's verification capabilities. Handles functions, structs, pointers, arrays, memory management, and ensures the generated Dafny code is well-typed, executable, verifiable, and can successfully run.

Analyzes code to identify security-critical time intervals and timing vulnerabilities in authentication, authorization, and time-sensitive security operations. Use this skill when reviewing code for proper timeout enforcement, token expiration, session management, rate limiting, password reset validity, or any time-sensitive security mechanism. Detects missing expiration checks, excessive timeout values, lack of rate limiting, client-side only validation, hardcoded timeouts, and timing attack vulnerabilities. Triggers when users ask to check security timeouts, verify token expiration handling, audit session timeout implementation, review rate limiting, or analyze time-based security controls.

Analyze CVE reachability in software repositories by examining how vulnerable dependencies are imported and used. Determines whether vulnerable components, classes, or functions are reachable from project code through call chain analysis, reflection detection, dynamic loading patterns, and configuration-gated behavior. Classifies each CVE as likely reachable, possibly reachable, or likely unreachable with supporting evidence. Use when analyzing security vulnerabilities in dependencies, performing post-disclosure CVE triage, assessing vulnerability impact, or when users ask to analyze CVE reachability, check if vulnerabilities are exploitable, or evaluate dependency security risks.

Generate prioritized CVE watchlists and actionable security recommendations for repositories. Use when analyzing CVE scan results, creating security reports, prioritizing vulnerability remediation, or generating security gate reports for CI/CD. Takes CVE scan results (JSON/SARIF from npm audit, pip-audit, Snyk), reachability analysis, and cutoff date as input. Combines severity, reachability, exploitability, and dependency criticality to rank CVEs by practical risk. Outputs markdown reports with concrete next-step guidance (immediate upgrade, monitor, ignore with justification, apply mitigation) suitable for issue trackers, security reviews, and CI security gates.

Identify and analyze unused or redundant code including unused functions/methods, unused variables/imports, unreachable code, and redundant conditions. Use when cleaning up codebases, improving maintainability, reducing technical debt, or conducting code quality audits. Analyzes Python code using AST analysis and produces markdown reports listing dead code locations with line numbers, severity ratings, and recommendations. Triggers when users ask to find dead code, remove unused code, identify unused imports, find unreachable code, or clean up redundant logic.

Dead code removal via parallel scanning, reference verification, batch execution, and atomic commits. You are the ORCHESTRATOR — you scan, verify, batch, then delegate ALL removals.

Identify, analyze, and manage software dependencies before deployment. Use this skill when preparing applications for deployment, resolving dependency conflicts, updating dependencies, auditing security vulnerabilities, managing package versions, or troubleshooting dependency-related issues. Supports multiple package managers (npm, pip, maven, cargo, go mod, composer) and provides actionable recommendations for dependency management.

Identify and replace deprecated API usage in source code with modern alternatives. Use when: (1) Modernizing legacy codebases, (2) Upgrading framework versions (React, Django, Spring, etc.), (3) Fixing deprecation warnings in build output, (4) Preparing for major version upgrades, (5) Ensuring code uses current best practices. Supports Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, and other major languages with both AST-based detection and pattern matching for accurate identification and automated replacement with validation.

Recommends appropriate software design patterns based on problem descriptions, requirements, or code scenarios. Use when designing software architecture, refactoring code, solving common design problems, or choosing between design approaches. Analyzes the problem context and suggests suitable creational, structural, behavioral, architectural, or concurrency patterns with implementation guidance and trade-off analysis.