Skills de Claude Code · página 93

Analyze what changed and generate a structured test plan at .turbo/test-plan.md covering four escalating levels: basic functionality, complex operations, adversarial testing, and cross-cutting scenarios. Use when the user asks to \"create a test plan\", \"plan tests\", \"what should I test\", \"generate test scenarios\", \"test plan for this PR\", or \"what are the test cases\".

Analyze a codebase and produce a structured threat model at .turbo/threat-model.md covering assets, trust boundaries, attack surfaces with existing mitigations, attacker stories, and calibrated severity. Use when the user asks to \"create a threat model\", \"threat model\", \"threat model this codebase\", \"security analysis\", \"analyze the attack surface\", \"what are the threats\", or \"identify security risks\".

Produce an implementation plan at .turbo/plans/<slug>.md. Use when the user asks to \"draft a plan\", \"draft the plan\", \"write an implementation plan\", \"plan this change\", \"create an implementation plan\", or needs a first-draft plan file before refinement.

Decompose a specification file into shells with YAML frontmatter. Each shell captures the wiring invariants (Produces, Consumes, Covers) and high-level Implementation Steps without committing to file paths. Use when the user asks to \"draft shells\", \"create shells\", \"break spec into shells\", \"decompose spec into sessions\", \"draft shells from spec\", \"generate shells from spec\", or \"make shells from spec\".

Guide a collaborative discussion that produces a specification document at .turbo/specs/<slug>.md. Use when the user asks to \"draft a spec\", \"create a spec\", \"write a spec\", \"discuss a project plan\", \"spec out a project\", \"design a system\", \"let's plan this project\", \"help me scope this\", \"architect a solution\", or \"let's discuss before building\".

Critically assess external feedback (code reviews, AI reviewers, PR comments) and decide which suggestions to apply using adversarial verification. Use when the user asks to \"evaluate findings\", \"assess review comments\", \"triage review feedback\", \"evaluate review output\", or \"filter false positives\".

Expand a shell into a full implementation plan. Verifies Consumes against the current codebase, runs a fresh pattern survey, escalates open questions, and fills in concrete file references and verification. Use when the user asks to \"expand a shell\", \"expand shell\", \"fill in the shell\", \"expand the shell\", or \"concretize the shell\".

Explain whatever the user is pointing at right now in plain language: a pending question, a piece of code, an error, a command output, or an artifact like a plan or findings report. Use when the user asks to \"explain this\", \"what am I being asked\", \"what's happening right now\", \"help me understand this\", \"what does this mean\", \"what does this error mean\", \"what is this code doing\", or \"what do these options mean\".

Fetch and summarize review feedback and conversation from a GitHub PR (unresolved review threads, review bodies, and PR conversation comments) without making changes. Use when the user asks to \"fetch PR comments\", \"show PR comments\", \"check PR for unresolved comments\", \"list review comments\", \"what comments are on the PR\", \"show unresolved threads\", or \"summarize PR feedback\".

Run the post-implementation quality assurance workflow including tests, code polishing, review, and commit. Use when the user asks to \"finalize implementation\", \"finalize changes\", \"wrap up implementation\", \"finish up\", \"ready to commit\", or \"run QA workflow\".

Find dead code using parallel subagent analysis and optional CLI tools, treating code only referenced from tests as dead. Use when the user asks to \"find dead code\", \"find unused code\", \"find unused exports\", \"find unreferenced functions\", \"clean up dead code\", or \"what code is unused\". Analysis-only — does not modify or delete code.

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use when the user asks to build landing pages, websites, dashboards, web components, or any frontend UI. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

Shared writing style rules for GitHub-facing output (PR comments, PR descriptions, PR titles). Differentiates insider vs outsider voice based on author association. Not typically invoked directly — loaded by other skills before composing GitHub text.

Validate improvements from .turbo/improvements.md, recommend a working set tailored to what's in the backlog, and run one lane: direct fixes, investigation, or planned work. One lane per session. Use when the user asks to \"implement improvements\", \"work on improvements\", \"address improvements\", \"process improvement backlog\", \"tackle improvements\", or \"implement noted improvements\".

Execute an implementation plan file produced by /draft-plan, /turboplan, or /expand-shell. Runs pre-implementation prep, then runs /implement to execute the steps and finalize. Use when the user asks to \"implement plan\", \"implement the plan\", \"execute the plan\", \"run the plan\", \"implement plans/<slug>.md\", \"start implementing the plan\", or starts a fresh session to implement a previously drafted plan.

Load code-style and task-specific skills, make the change described by the current context, then run /finalize for QA and commit. Use for ad-hoc changes when no plan file or improvements backlog governs the work, and when the user asks to \"just implement\", \"implement directly\", \"implement without a plan\", or \"apply the change\".

Interpret third-party feedback by running parallel internal and peer interpretations to surface intent, correctness concerns, and ambiguities. Use when the user asks to \"interpret feedback\", \"interpret comments\", \"what does this feedback mean\", \"clarify reviewer intent\", \"understand this review\", or \"interpret these suggestions\".

Systematically investigate bugs, test failures, build errors, performance issues, or unexpected behavior by cycling through characterize-isolate-hypothesize-test steps. Use when the user asks to \"investigate this bug\", \"debug this\", \"figure out why this fails\", \"find the root cause\", \"why is this broken\", \"troubleshoot this\", \"diagnose the issue\", \"what's causing this error\", \"look into this failure\", \"why is this test failing\", or \"track down this bug\".

Deep architecture report that fans out parallel inspections across different aspects of the codebase (structure, tech stack, APIs, patterns, data flow, dependencies, testing) and synthesizes findings into a comprehensive document at .turbo/codebase-map.md and .turbo/codebase-map.html. Use when the user asks to \"map the codebase\", \"map codebase\", \"architecture report\", \"codebase overview\", \"architecture overview\", \"what am I looking at\", or \"explain this codebase\".

Migrate legacy files in .turbo/ to current formats. Covers plans and shells (layout split, frontmatter normalization, prompt-plan index cleanup) and improvements.md (legacy `trivial`/`standard` Type values rewritten to `direct`/`plan`). Use when the user asks to \"migrate turbo files\", \"migrate turbo\", \"migrate turboplans\", \"migrate turbo plans\", \"upgrade plan format\", \"add frontmatter to plans\", \"convert old plans\", or \"migrate improvements\".

Capture an out-of-scope improvement opportunity so it doesn't get lost. Use when the user asks to \"note improvement\", \"save improvement\", \"track this for later\", \"remember this improvement\", \"note this idea\", \"log improvement\", \"backlog this\", or \"park this idea\". Also invoke proactively when noticing something improvable during work that falls outside the current task's scope — briefly mention it to the user and offer to note it.

Developer onboarding guide that composes architecture mapping, tooling review, and agentic setup review with setup, troubleshooting, and next-steps agents to produce a comprehensive guide at .turbo/onboarding.md and .turbo/onboarding.html. Use when the user asks to \"onboard me\", \"onboard to this project\", \"generate onboarding guide\", \"new developer guide\", \"how do I get started\", or \"help me ramp up\".

Run an independent peer review via Codex. Use when the user asks to \"peer review\", \"peer review my code\", \"peer review my plan\", \"peer review my spec\", \"peer review my shells\", \"get a second opinion\", or \"independent review\".

Fetch and rank open GitHub issues by community engagement, present the top 3 candidates, and plan implementation for the selected issue. Use when the user asks to \"pick next issue\", \"next issue\", \"which issue should I work on\", \"top issues\", \"most popular issues\", \"prioritize issues\", or \"what should I work on next\".

Pick the next shell whose dependencies are satisfied and carry it through planning: expand, refine, self-improve, halt. Use when the user asks to \"pick next shell\", \"next shell\", \"continue project\", \"what's next\", \"next implementation step\", or \"continue with the plan\".

Stage, format, lint, test, review, smoke test, and re-run itself until stable. Use when the user asks to \"polish code\", \"refine code\", \"iterate on code quality\", \"review loop\", \"clean up, test, and review loop\", or \"run the polish loop\".

Stand up the project's live app and hand it to the user to try a change firsthand, then gate on their verdict before continuing. Use when the user asks to \"preview the change\", \"let me try it\", \"spin up the app so I can test it\", \"set it up so I can poke at it\", or before finalizing a UI/UX change that needs human eyes.

Recall the reasoning behind a past change by locating the Claude Code transcript that produced it. Use when the user asks to \"recall reasoning\", \"find reasoning\", \"look up reasoning\", \"recall implementation reasoning\", \"find the rationale\", \"why did I do X\", \"recall from transcripts\", or \"find the transcript for this commit\".

Iteratively review and revise a planning artifact until no new findings survive evaluation. Supports plans, shells, and specs. Use when the user asks to \"refine the plan\", \"refine the shells\", \"refine this spec\", \"iterate on the plan\", \"iterate on the shells\", \"tighten the plan\", \"tighten the shells\", \"tighten the spec\", \"improve the plan\", \"improve the shells\", or \"improve the spec\".

Draft, confirm, and post a single conversational reply to GitHub PR conversation comments (issue comments). The reply addresses all tracked items in one natural-prose message. Use when the user asks to \"reply to PR conversation\", \"post PR conversation replies\", or \"draft PR conversation messages\".

Draft, confirm, and post replies to GitHub PR review threads. Handles per-category reply formatting, re-fetches thread resolution state so auto-resolved threads are skipped, and posts via GraphQL. Use when the user asks to \"reply to PR threads\", \"post PR thread replies\", or \"draft PR reply messages\".

Choose an implementation path (direct or plan) for evaluated findings and dispatch it. Direct path applies fixes directly; plan path runs /turboplan. Use after /evaluate-findings has tagged findings and they need to be implemented, or when the user asks to \"resolve findings\", \"apply evaluated findings\", or \"dispatch findings to implementation\".

Evaluate, fix, answer, and reply to GitHub pull request review comments and conversation comments. Handles both change requests (fix or skip) and reviewer questions (explain using reasoning recalled from past Claude Code transcripts). Use when the user asks to \"resolve PR comments\", \"fix review comments\", \"address PR feedback\", \"handle review comments\", \"address review feedback\", \"respond to PR comments\", \"answer review questions\", or \"address code review\".

Detect agentic coding infrastructure in a project: CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, installed skills, MCP servers, hooks, and cross-tool compatibility (Claude Code and Codex CLI). Returns structured findings about agentic readiness without applying changes. Use when the user asks to \"review agentic setup\", \"check agentic setup\", \"agentic readiness\", \"is this project set up for AI coding\", or \"review AI coding setup\".

Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, API misuse, consistency issues, simplicity problems, or test coverage gaps by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Single-concern with a type argument, or full review with no argument. Use when the user asks to \"review my code\", \"full code review\", \"review my changes\", \"check for bugs\", \"scan for bugs\", \"review correctness\", \"security audit\", \"find vulnerabilities\", \"review security\", \"check API usage\", \"verify against docs\", \"check for cross-file duplication\", \"review consistency\", \"check for code reuse\", \"review simplicity\", \"find untested code\", or \"review test coverage\".

Detect package managers and discover outdated or vulnerable dependencies. Returns structured findings without upgrading. Use when the user asks to \"review dependencies\", \"check for outdated packages\", \"check dependencies\", \"scan dependencies\", or \"dependency review\".

Review a planning artifact (plan, shells, or spec) by running internal and peer reviews in parallel and returning combined findings. Use when the user asks to \"review my plan\", \"review my shells\", \"review my spec\", \"check my plan\", \"check my shells\", \"check my spec\", \"critique my plan\", \"critique my shells\", \"critique my spec\", or wants feedback on a planning artifact.

Review a pull request by fetching PR comments, running a comprehensive code review, evaluating findings, and dispatching to implementation. Use when the user asks to \"review PR\", \"review pull request\", \"review this PR\", \"check PR before merging\", or \"full PR review\".

Detect what dev tooling infrastructure a project has and flag gaps across linters, formatters, pre-commit hooks, test runners, and CI/CD pipelines. Returns structured findings without applying changes. Use when the user asks to \"review tooling\", \"check project tooling\", \"what tooling is missing\", \"review dev infrastructure\", or \"tooling audit\".

Extract lessons from the current session and route them to the appropriate knowledge layer (project AGENTS.md, auto memory, existing skills, or new skills). Use when the user asks to \"self-improve\", \"distill this session\", \"save learnings\", \"update CLAUDE.md with what we learned\", \"capture session insights\", \"remember this for next time\", \"extract lessons\", \"update skills from session\", or \"what did we learn\".

Commit, push, and optionally create or update a PR for the current staged changes. Use when the user asks to \"ship\", \"ship it\", \"ship changes\", \"commit push and PR\", or \"ship this\".

Run a multi-agent review of changed files for reuse, quality, efficiency, clarity, and altitude issues followed by automated fixes. Use when the user asks to \"simplify code\", \"review changed code\", \"check for code reuse\", \"review code quality\", \"review efficiency\", \"simplify changes\", \"clean up code\", \"refactor changes\", or \"run simplify\".

Run a multi-agent review of code comments and markdown documentation for unnecessary content, then fix the issues. Covers what-restating comments, name-mirroring doc comments, status-update prose, and other documentation noise. Use when the user asks to \"simplify docs\", \"simplify documentation\", \"clean up comments\", \"clean up docs\", \"review documentation\", \"strip unnecessary comments\", \"reduce doc noise\", or \"run simplify-docs\".

Execute an approved split plan, shipping each change group separately as its own branch and PR or as sequential commits on the current branch. Use when the user asks to \"split and ship\", \"ship the split plan\", \"create separate PRs\", or \"split changes into branches\".

Stage files, create a commit, and push in one step. Use when the user asks to \"stage commit and push\", \"add commit and push\", \"commit and push\", or \"commit and push my changes\".

Stage files and create a commit in one step with a message matching existing commit style. Use when the user asks to \"stage and commit\", \"add and commit\", \"commit my changes\", or \"commit these changes\".

Stage implementation changes for commit with precise file selection. Use when the user asks to \"stage changes\", \"stage files\", \"add files to staging\", or \"prepare changes for commit\".

Survey the codebase for analogous features, reusable utilities, and existing patterns relevant to a proposed change. Returns structured findings without writing code. Use when the user asks to \"survey patterns\", \"find existing patterns\", \"look for analogous features\", \"check how similar things are done\", \"find prior art for this change\", or needs pattern context before planning a change.

Analyze task complexity and route to a mode by artifact: direct fix for clear-scope changes, plan file when the approach needs to be written down, or spec and shells for multi-session projects. Use when the user asks to \"turboplan\", \"run turboplan\", \"plan this task\", \"turbo plan mode\", \"plan and implement\", or \"use turboplan instead of plan mode\".

Teach the user to deeply understand a change through interactive tutoring: restating understanding, drilling into why/what/how, and quizzing until mastery. The active counterpart to a one-shot explanation. Use when the user asks to \"understand this change\", \"teach me this change\", \"help me understand what changed\", \"walk me through this change\", \"make sure I understand this\", \"quiz me on this\", or \"teach me what we did\".

Update the Unreleased section of CHANGELOG.md based on current changes. No-op if CHANGELOG.md does not exist. Use when the user asks to \"update changelog\", \"add to changelog\", \"update the changelog\", \"changelog entry\", \"add changelog entry\", or \"log this change\".

Upgrade project dependencies with breaking change research for major version updates. Use when the user asks to \"update dependencies\", \"upgrade packages\", \"upgrade dependencies\", \"update deps\", \"upgrade deps\", \"update npm deps\", \"update Swift packages\", \"cargo update\", \"go get updates\", \"bundle update\", or \"pip upgrade\".

Update an existing GitHub pull request's title and description to reflect the current state of the branch. Use when the user asks to \"update the PR\", \"update PR description\", \"update PR title\", \"refresh PR description\", or \"sync PR with changes\".

Update installed Turbo skills from the local repo with a dynamic changelog, conflict resolution for customized skills, and guided user experience. Use when the user asks to \"update turbo\", \"update turbo skills\", \"reinstall turbo\", or \"upgrade turbo\".

Run a non-interactive Claude Code print-mode call from Codex. Use when the user asks to \"claude print\", \"ask claude\", \"run claude\", \"consult claude\", or when a Codex Turbo skill needs Claude as an independent peer reviewer.

Assess project-wide structural technical debt: complexity hotspots, deprecated API usage, duplication clusters, and architecture rot. Ranks findings by impact and refactor effort into a report at .turbo/technical-debt.md. Use when the user asks to \"assess technical debt\", \"find technical debt\", \"review technical debt\", \"what should we refactor\", \"find refactoring candidates\", \"where is the code rot\", or \"what's our worst code\". Analysis-only — does not modify code.

Apply a UX lens to a user-facing change: whether it serves the user's real goal and whether the path through it holds together, using the Understanding, Bridging, and Flowing contexts. Use when scoping, planning, or assessing any change that affects what a user sees or does. Loaded as a lens during planning and assessment.

>-

>-

Use when a task should run through Hydra's Lead-driven workflow for multi-agent orchestration, or when an existing workflow must be inspected or cleaned up.

>-

>-

>-

Use when starting work in a TermCanvas-managed repo to route between direct work, Hydra, or a narrow TermCanvas skill.

Analyzes Rails applications and generates comprehensive upgrade reports with breaking changes, deprecations, and step-by-step migration guides for Rails 2.3 through 8.1. Use when upgrading Rails applications, planning multi-hop upgrades, or querying version-specific changes. Based on FastRuby.io methodology and "The Complete Guide to Upgrade Rails" ebook.

Clean up after (or abandon) a Rails upgrade. Drop NextRails.next? and NextRails.current? branches and retire dual-boot scaffolding (Gemfile.next, Gemfile.next.lock, conditional Gemfile groups), keeping either the next or the current version. Trigger when the user says they are done with the upgrade, want to clean up dual-boot, want to drop NextRails branches, want to finish the upgrade, want to abandon or revert the upgrade attempt, want to roll back to the current Rails version, or want to pause this upgrade hop. Based on FastRuby.io's "Finishing an Upgrade" methodology, extended with an abandon/pause path.

Query and orchestrate Arkloop Activity Record local activity data. Covers browser history, search terms, screen time, bluetooth, shell commands, window focus, keyboard, mouse, clipboard, Codex sessions, and optional Screenpipe integration.

Query the user's screen recordings, audio, UI elements, and usage analytics via the local Screenpipe REST API at localhost:3030. Use when the user asks about their screen activity, meetings, apps, productivity, media export, retranscription, or connected services.

Check Screenpipe health status, process state, and diagnose common issues

Retrieve and analyze Screenpipe CLI backend logs and desktop app logs for debugging

Drive real macOS applications through the CUA Driver MCP server when the user asks to inspect, operate, or automate visible desktop UI.

Diagnose and fix broken skills. Use when a skill isn't working correctly.

Systematic multi-perspective code review with consistent quality gates.

Document solved problems for knowledge persistence

Systematic debugging with structured reproduction and root cause analysis.

Database, auth, and backend expertise for Supabase operations in [PROJECT_NAME]

Manage file-based todo tracking in the todos/ directory

Resume context from previous session

Unified testing commands and patterns across frontend and backend.

|

|

|

When the user wants to track follower growth, understand what drives new followers, or analyze audience development. Also use when the user mentions 'follower growth,' 'followers,' 'audience growth,' 'gaining followers,' 'losing followers,' 'who follows me,' or 'grow my audience.' Uses BlackTwist follower data when available. For post-level metrics, see performance-analyzer-sms. For content patterns, see content-pattern-analyzer-sms.

When the user wants to write a caption for a visual-first social media post on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Pinterest, or YouTube. Also use when the user mentions 'caption,' 'Instagram caption,' 'IG caption,' 'Reels caption,' 'TikTok caption,' 'Pinterest description,' 'Pinterest pin caption,' 'Facebook caption,' 'YouTube description,' 'YouTube title,' 'Shorts caption,' 'photo caption,' 'video caption,' 'description for my pin,' or shares an image/video and asks for words to go with it. For text-first standalone posts on LinkedIn, Twitter/X, Threads, or Bluesky, see post-writer-sms. For multi-slide carousels, see carousel-writer-sms. For opening lines, see hook-writer-sms.

When the user wants to write content for a LinkedIn carousel, Instagram carousel, Facebook carousel, TikTok photo carousel, Pinterest Idea Pin, or any swipeable multi-slide format. Also use when the user mentions 'carousel,' 'slides,' 'LinkedIn carousel,' 'Instagram carousel,' 'IG carousel,' 'photo carousel,' 'TikTok photo carousel,' 'Idea Pin,' 'Pinterest Idea Pin,' 'swipe post,' 'slide deck,' or 'visual content.' Outputs slide-by-slide text content (not visual design). For single posts, see post-writer-sms. For threads, see thread-writer-sms. For caption copy under each slide post, see caption-writer-sms.

When the user wants to plan a posting schedule, create a content calendar, or organize when and what to post. Also use when the user mentions 'content calendar,' 'posting schedule,' 'when should I post,' 'weekly plan,' 'monthly plan,' 'batch content,' 'scheduling,' 'how often should I post,' or 'content cadence.' For deciding what topics to cover, see content-strategy-sms. For writing the actual posts, see post-writer-sms.

When the user wants to find patterns in what content works and what doesn't. Also use when the user mentions 'what's working,' 'content patterns,' 'best topics,' 'best format,' 'best time to post,' 'analyze my content,' 'do more of,' 'do less of,' or 'what should I change.' For raw metrics, see performance-analyzer-sms. For audience-specific analysis, see audience-growth-tracker-sms. For actionable recommendations, see optimization-advisor-sms.

When the user wants to turn one piece of content into multiple formats or adapt content across text-first and visual-first platforms (LinkedIn, Twitter/X, Threads, Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Pinterest, YouTube). Also use when the user mentions 'repurpose,' 'turn this into,' 'adapt this for,' 'cross-post,' 'reformat,' 'blog to social,' 'newsletter to posts,' 'video to posts,' 'YouTube to clips,' 'Reels from a podcast,' or 'get more from this content.' For writing original posts, see post-writer-sms. For threads, see thread-writer-sms. For carousels, see carousel-writer-sms. For visual-first captions, see caption-writer-sms.

When the user wants to plan a social media content strategy, decide what to post, or figure out topic clusters and content mix. Also use when the user mentions 'content strategy,' 'what should I post,' 'content ideas,' 'topic clusters,' 'content pillars,' 'content planning,' 'content mix,' 'I don't know what to post,' or 'social media strategy.' Use this to define the what and why of posting. For writing actual posts, see post-writer-sms. For scheduling, see content-calendar-sms. For platform-specific tactics, see platform-strategy-sms.